Abstract
The article offers a close reading of the famous upanişadic story of Indra, Virocana and Prajāpati from the eighth chapter of the Chāndogya-Upanişad versus Śankara’s bhāşya, with special reference to the notions of suşupti and turīya. That Śankara is not always loyal to the Upanişadic texts is a well-known fact. That the Upanişads are (too) often read through Śan-kara’s Advaitic eyes is also known. The following lines will not merely illustrate the gap between text and commentary but will also reveal an unexpected Upanişadic depiction of ‘dreamless sleep’ and ‘transcendental consciousness’. Suşupti is described here as ‘one step too far’, as a ‘break’ or discontinuity in one’s consciousness; whereas turīya is depicted positively, and surprisingly even in wordly terms. Unlike the third state of consciousness in which there is no ‘world’ nor ‘me’, and which is described through Indra’s character as ‘total destruction’ (vināśa); in turīya, the world ‘comes back’, or rather the ‘renouncer’ returns to the world. Sankara’s position, as far as the story under discussion is concerned, is radically different. For him, the Upanişadic story illustrates the continuity of consciousness in all its states. For him, the identification with merely one of the consciousness-states is an error (adhyāsa) which causes suffering. Consciousness prevails even in suşupti, and turīya has nothing to do with ‘coming back to the world’, since there is nowhere to come back from or to. Turīya, as seen by the Advaitin, consists of all the other states of consciousness together, or as K. C. Bhattacharyya puts it, ‘It is not only a stage among stages; it is the truth of the other stages’.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brahmasūtra şānkara Bhāşyam (1998). Varanasi: Caukhambā Vidyābhavan.
Ten Principal Upanişads with Śankarabhāşya (Īśā, Kena, Kaţha, Praşna, Muņdaka, Māņdūkya, Taittirīya, Aitareya, Chāndogya, Bŗhadā raņyaka) (2000). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Apte V.S. (2005). The student’s sanskrit-english dictionary. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass
Āraņya S.H. (1983). Yoga philosophy of Patañjali. Albany, State University of New York Press
Bhattacharyya K.C. (1983). Studies in philosophy. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass
Brereton J.P. (1986). Tat Tvam Asi in context. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 136(1):98–108
Chakrabarti A. (1983). Is liberation (mokşa) pleasant?. Philosophy East and West 33: 167–182
Dave, J.H. (Ed. and Trans.) (1990). Thirteen principal Upanişads Vol. II: Māņdū kya Upanişad with Gaudapāda Kārikās and Śankara’s Bhaşya. Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
Daya Krishna (2001). Can the analysis of Adhyāsa ever lead to an advaitic conclusion? In His New perspectives in Indian philosophy (pp. 150–163). Jaipur and New Delhi: Rajat Publications.
Deutsch E. (1969). Advaita Vedānta: A philosophical reconstruction. Honolulu, East-West Center Press
Doniger O’flaherty W. (1987). Dreams, illusion and other realities. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass
Gambhīrānanda, S. (Trans.) (1992). Chāndogya upanişad with the commentary of Sankarācārya. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama.
Kanthmani, A. (2007). I had a dreamless sleep. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research (Forthcoming).
Narasimhan V. (1996). Upadeşasāhasrī: A thousand teachings of Adi Śankarācārya. Bombay, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
Olivelle, P. (Trans.) (1998). The early Upanişads. New Delhi, Oxford University Press
Radhakrishnan, S. (Trans.) (2005). The principal Upanişads. New Delhi: Harper Collins India.
Rambachan A. (1991). Accomplishing the accomplished: The vedas as a source of valid knowledge in Şankara. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press
Rushdie S. (1999). The ground beneath her feet. New York, Henry Holt & Company
Thibaut, G. (Trans.) (1994). The Vedānta Sū tras with the commentary of şankarācārya (Part I and II), In M. Muller (Ed.), Sacred books of the east, Vols. 34 and 38. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is dedicated to Prof. Daya Krishna (1924-2007).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raveh, D. Ayam aham asmīti: Self-consciousness and Identity in the Eighth Chapter of the Chāndogya Upanişad vs. Śankara’s Bhāşya . J Indian Philos 36, 319–333 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-007-9031-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-007-9031-7