Abstract
This article presents findings from an interpretive study of teachers’ visualized and publicly shared depictions of teaching and learning. Drawing on images posted by teachers on the social media site Twitter, and Arendt’s writing on the public, private, and common, this article examines classroom photographs and their accompanying text as a public professional discourse about teaching and learning, and as an educational discourse of and about the public. Findings show relationships between epistemologically framed classroom events and teachers’ work within pedagogical, politicized, and public contexts. They show pedagogies implicated in hegemonies of the private, possibilities for a public to be pedagogically enacted, and how, through their practice, teachers might pedagogically hold the public as a matter of public concern. This article makes a case for the publicness of education to include a jurisdiction of enactment within teaching and learning, one that makes an experience of the public part of the ways of being in which students and the world newly come to be.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abram, D. (2010). Becoming animal: An earthly cosmology. Vintage Books.
Adichie, C. N. (2009). The danger of a single story. [Video file]. https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story
Alberta Education. (1996). Science (Elementary) [Program of Studies]. Alberta Education. https://education.alberta.ca/media/159711/elemsci.pdf
Anderson, G., & Cohen, M. I. (2015). Redesigning the identities of teachers and leaders: A framework for studying new professionalism and educator resistance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(85), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2086
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought. The Viking Press.
Barnhart, R. K. (1995). The Barnhart concise dictionary of etymology: The origins of American English words. HarperCollins.
Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., & Marshall, A. (2012). Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8
Biesta, G. (2007). Why ‘what works' won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
Biesta, G. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 29(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
Biesta, G. (2012). Becoming public: Public pedagogy, citizenship and the public sphere. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.723736
Biesta, G., Allan, J., & Edwards, R. (Eds.). (2014). Making a difference in theory: The theory question in education and the education question in theory. Routledge.
Biesta, G., & Osberg, D. (2007). Beyond re/presentation: A case for updating the epistemology of schooling. Interchange, 38(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-007-9015-2
Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Paradigm Publishers.
Bouvier, V. (2018). Truthing: An ontology of living an ethic of shakihi (love) and ikkimmapiiyipitsiin (sanctified kindness). Canadian Social Studies, 50(2), 39–44.
Burden, K. J. (2010). Conceptualising teachers’ professional learning with Web 2.0. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741011054456
Caputo, J. D. (2000). More radical hermeneutics: On not knowing who we are. Indiana University Press.
Couros, A., & Jarrett, K. (2012). Twitter. In S. McLeod & C. Lehmann (Eds.), What school leaders need to know about digital technologies and social media (pp. 147–152). Jossey-Bass.
Davis, B. (2018). On the many metaphors of learning … and their associated educational frames. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1330423
Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2015). Engaging minds: Cultures of education and practices of teaching (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Dickes, A. C., Sengupta, P., Farris, A. V., & Basu, S. (2016). Development of mechanistic reasoning and multilevel explanations of ecology in third grade using agent-based models. Science Education, 100(4), 734–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21217
Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x
Field, J. C. (2018). Curriculum in the post truth era: Is truth dead? Canadian Social Studies, 50(2), 44–48.
Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media +Society, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366
Fleury, S., & Garrison, J. (2014). Toward a new philosophical anthropology of education: Fuller considerations of social constructivism. Interchange, 45(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-014-9216-4
Forte, A., Humphreys, M., & Park, T. (2012). Grassroots professional development: How teachers use Twitter. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Dublin, Ireland.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1998). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum Books.
Giroux, H. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling: A critical reader. Westview Press.
Hall, D., & McGinity, R. (2015). Conceptualizing teacher professional identity in neoliberal times: Resistance, compliance and reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(88), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2092
Howard, P. (2011). Living as textual animals: Curriculum, sustainability and the inherency of language. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 9(1), 83–114.
Hsu, H. (2019). Affect theory and the new age of anxiety: How Lauren Berlant’s cultural criticism predicted the Trumping of politics. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/25/affect-theory-and-the-new-age-of-anxiety.
Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
Lifshitz, J. (2019). Helping students to see the beauty in a place like Baltimore. [Blog post] Retrieved from https://crawlingoutoftheclassroom.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/helping-students-to-see-the-beauty-in-a-place-like-baltimore/.
Liisha. [@GWSHinder]. (2018). The concept of two-eyed seeing has allowed us to explore the hummingbird through both an Indigenous and scientific perspective. [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter https://twitter.com/GWSHinder/status/1068118819204292608?s=20
Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
Marshall, A. (2018). Two-eyed seeing. [Video file]. The Green Interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwg2MEsr9WI
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011). I Tweet honestly, I Tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
Moules, N. J., McCaffrey, G., Field, J. C., & Laing, C. M. (2015). Conducting hermeneutic research: From philosophy to practice. Peter Lang.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1992). Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford University Press.
Osberg, D., Biesta, G., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00407.x
Reidenberg, J. R., Breaux, T., Cranor, L. F., & French, B. (2015). Disagreeable privacy policies: Mismatches between meaning and users’ understanding. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30(1), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z384K33
Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). SAGE.
Rushton, K. [@KenzieRushton]. (2018, September 12). @JCS_RavensG10 students representing and analyzing data from a simulation. Noticing patterns in aggregated data, gaining insight into how data can… [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/KenzieRushton/status/1040084886969675776 .
Saldaña, C. M., Welner, K. G., Macolm, S., & Tisch, E. (2018). Examining the new phenomenon of teachers as brand ambassadors. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/brand-ambassador
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The concept of the structure of the discipline. Educational Record, 43, 197–205.
Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81(4), 501–522.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2009). The public and its university: Beyond learning for civic employability? European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2009.8.2.204
Sims, M., Waniganayake, M., & Hadley, F. (2018). Educational leadership: An evolving role in Australian early childhood settings. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 960–979. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217714254
Street, B. (2006). Autonomous and ideological models of literacy: Approaches from New Literacy Studies. Media Anthropology Network. www.philbu.net/media-anthropology/street_newliteracy.pdf
Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559
Towers, J., & Davis, B. (2002). Structuring occasions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 313–340.
Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. The University of Aberdeen. http://www.dotrural.ac.uk/socialmediaresearchethics.pdf
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
Twitter. (2020). Twitter Terms of Service. https://twitter.com/en/tos
Vintimilla, C. D. (2014). Neoliberal fun and happiness in early childhood education. Canadian Children, 39(1), 79–87.
Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). #TwitterforTeachers: The implications of Twitter as a self-directed professional development tool for K-12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925694
Wright, T. (2016). The photography handbook (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Zimmerman, A. S. (2018). Democratic teacher education: Preserving public education as a public good in an era of neoliberalism. The Educational Forum, 82(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1458358
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mosher, R. Teaching, Learning, and the Public: Interpretations of Teachers’ Classroom Images. Interchange 53, 1–22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09444-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09444-2