The purpose of this study is to explore the perception of subject advisers on curriculum change and delivery in secondary schools. The survey design which adopts quantitative research approach was used. Random sampling procedure is used to select b samples of 300 respondents in the study who are subject advisers. Questionnaires were administered to all selected 300 subject advisers, however, only 217 were duly completed and analysed for the study. The findings indicate among others that curriculum delivery is dependent on teachers’ familiarization with the curriculum, planning of lessons and teaching through the use of the curriculum. The study recommends that teachers should be motivated to familiarize themselves with the curriculum, trained periodically on how to use the curriculum when planning their lessons and teaching. Also, continuous curriculum change should be checkmated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice,7(9), 106–107.
Bantwini, B. D. (2012). Primary school science teachers’ perspectives regarding their professional development: Implications for school districts in South Africa. Professional Development in Education,38(4), 56–70.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised ed.). New York, Rowman & Littlefield.
Delius, P., & Schirmer, S. (2001). Towards a workable rural development strategy. TIPS Working Paper 3, University of Witwatersrand.
Department of Education (Curriculum News). (2011). Improving the quality learning of teaching, strengthening curriculum delivery from 2010 and beyond. South Africa: Department of Education (Curriculum News).
Du Plooy-Cilliers, F., Davis, C., & Bezuidenhout, R. (2014). Research matters. South Africa: JUTA.
Hutt, L. E., & Tang, A. (2013). The new education malpractice litigation. Virginia Law Review,99(3), 420–440.
Khousa, G. (2013). Systemic school improvement interventions in South Africa: Some practical lessons from development practitioners. Johannesburg: African Minds for JET Education Services.
Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step by step guide for beginners. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lizer, T. L. (2013). The impact of the curriculum change in the teaching and learning of science: A case study in under-resourced schools in Vhembe District. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Molapo, M. R. (2016). How educators implement curriculum changes. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
Nel, P., Nel, L., & du Plessis, A. (2011). Implications for human resources and employment relations practice with regards to the integration of corporate ethics programmes into the culture of organisations. International Employment Relations Review.,17(2), 121–132.
Ornsteins, A. C., & Hunkins, P. F. (2009). Curriculum: foundations, principles and issues (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
Rogan, M. J., & Grayson, D. J. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education,25(10), 1171–1204.
Schwartz, M. S., & Sadler, P. M. (2009). Depth versus breadth: How content coverage in high school science courses relate to later success in college science coursework. Science Education,93(5), 798–826.
Snyder, R. R. (2017). Resistance to change among veteran teachers: Providing voice for more effective engagement international. Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation,12(1), 2155–9635.
Stears, M. (2009). How social and critical constructivism can inform science curriculum design: A study from South Africa. Education Research,51(4), 397–410.
Tanja, C., & Hannum, S. E. (2009). Teacher professional learning communities in resource-constrained primary schools in rural China. SAGE Journals,3(3), 312–325.
Terhart, E. (2013). Teacher resistance against school reform: Reflecting an inconvenient truth. School Leadership and Management,33(5), 486–500.
Uleanya, C., & Gamede, B. T. (2018). Correlates of pedagogic malpractices. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning (The IJTL),13(2), 36–52.
Uleanya, C., Rugbeer, Y., & Duma, M. A. N. (2018). Localizing educational curriculum of tertiary institutions: Approach to sustainable development. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education,21(1), 100–121.
No funding was received for this research; it was personally funded by authors.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest among authors.
Informed consent form was duly completed by participants.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, V.T., Gamede, B.T. & Uleanya, C. Subject Advisers’ Perception of Curriculum Delivery in the Intermediate Phase in South Africa. Interchange 50, 293–303 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-019-09359-z
- Curriculum change
- Curriculum delivery
- Subject advisers