Analysing Principals’ Policy Perceptions of Educators’ Disciplinary Procedures: Cases in Gauteng Province, South Africa
- 19 Downloads
A disciplinary process in respect of educators in South African schools can be a tedious and sometimes a lengthy process. The disciplinary process has sometimes yielded positive results but there is also a concern by school leaders about the effectiveness of this policy, as in some instances results have shown the opposite. Therefore, this study analyses the perceptions of principals in respect of the policy on educator’s disciplinary procedure. The study adopted a generic qualitative research design. Qualitative data was collected from a purposefully selected sample of twenty principals by means of in-depth interviews. An inductive analysis framework was used to analyse qualitative data. Among the findings was that principals seemed less confident about the effectiveness of the policy on disciplinary procedure in respect of educators. One of the recommendations then is that a policy review is necessary to deal with perceived policy flaws.
KeywordsDiscipline Disciplinary process Education management Teacher misconduct School leadership
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Author A declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Author B declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Anangisye, W. A. L., & Barrett, A. M. (2005). Professional identity and misconduct: Perspectives of Tanzanian teachers. South African Review of Education with Education with Production, 11, 5–22.Google Scholar
- Bray, E. (2005). Human rights in education. Pretoria: Centre for Education Law and Policy (CELP).Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Grogan, J. (2005). Workplace law. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
- Joubert, R. (Ed.). (2015). The law of education in South Africa. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lewis, R., & Riley, P. (2009). Teacher misbehaviour. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher and teaching (pp. 131–417). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Mancini, M. (2016). Discipline for teacher misconduct often handled in secret, Marketplace finds, CBS News, April 08, pp1.Google Scholar
- Mans, C. S. (2015). An education law perspective on educator misconduct and educator secutity. M Ed Thesis. Potchefstroom: University of North-West.Google Scholar
- McLean, V. A. (2016). USA Today teacher misconduct investigation prompts audit in 50 states, USA Today Network Press Room, February, p. 2.Google Scholar
- Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Mothemane, K. D. (2014). How do principals manage educator misconduct in public schools. M Ed Thesis. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
- Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6 (th ed.). Munich: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Oosthuizen, I. J., Rossouw, J. P., & De Wet, A. (2004). Introduction to education law. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.Google Scholar
- Shaikhnag, N., & Assan, T. E. B. (2014). The effects of abolishing corporal punishment on learner behavior in South African high schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(7), 435–442.Google Scholar
- Singhal, P. & Gladstone, N. (2018). Number of teachers fired from public schools on the rise, The Sidney Morning Herald, April 8, pp 1.Google Scholar
- South Africa. (1995). Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995. Cape Town: Government Printer.Google Scholar
- South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Printers.Google Scholar
- South Africa. (1998). Employment of Educators Act 96 of 1998. Pretoria: Government Printers.Google Scholar
- South Africa. (2000a). Education Laws Amendment Act 53 of 2000. Pretoria: Government Printers.Google Scholar
- South Africa. (2000b). South African Council of Educators Act 31 of 2000. Pretoria: Government Printers.Google Scholar
- Squelch, J. (2005). An educator’s guide to labour law. Pretoria: CELP.Google Scholar
- Van Kerken, E. T. (2000). Labour law for the education sector. In I. J. Oosthuizen (Ed.), Aspects of education law (pp. 70–85). Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
- Welman, C., Kruger, F., & Mitchell, B. (2005). Research methodology (3rd ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar