Advertisement

Interchange

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 393–409 | Cite as

Bringing Democratic Theory into Didactical Practice. Concepts of Education for Democracy Among Norwegian Pre-service Teachers

  • Kristin Gregers Eriksen
Article
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Democracy is highlighted in the Norwegian school system. This article investigates how pre-service teachers in social studies understand the more theoretical concept of democracy, and in what ways they intend to operationalize it with future pupils. Three ideal types are used to locate perspectives in the data: pure liberalist, majority rule and deliberative models of democracy. The findings indicate that perceptions of democracy in the sample are most commonly associated with core aspects of liberal democracy through a general focus on elections and voting, majority rule and individual civil liberties. A striking finding is the highly apparent internalization of participation as a norm and ideal in itself. However, ideas of contents and didactical implications of participation varies among respondents. As many also display a seemingly restricted interpretation of the political sphere, this might imply a thin understanding of democratic participation. The article further points out that translating concepts from political science into pedagogical notions is not a straightforward endeavor.

Keywords

Social studies Pre-service teachers Citizenship education Democracy Participation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by University of South Eastern Norway.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Ethical Standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Afdal, G. (2010). Researching religious education as social practice. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  2. Arensmeyer, C. (2010). The democratic common sense. Young Swedes’ understanding of democracy—Theoretical features and educational incentives. Young, 18(2), 197–222. http://you.sagepub.com/content/18/2/197.full.pdf.
  3. Bakken, A. (2009). Ulikhet på tvers. Har foreldres utdanning, kjønn og minoritetsstatus like stor betydning for elevers karakterer på alle skoler? [Inequality across. Does parents’ educational level, sex and minority status influence pupils’ grades at all schools?]. Report 8/2009. Oslo: NOVA.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  6. Biesta, G. (2009). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology and Practice, 6(2), 35–49.Google Scholar
  7. Biesta, G. (2011a). The ignorant citizen: Mouffe, Ranciere, and the subject of democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesta, G. (2011b). God uddannelse i målingens tidsalderetik, politik og demokrati [Education in a time of measurement. Ethics, politics and democracy]. Århus: Klim.Google Scholar
  9. Biseth, H. (2012). Educators as custodians of democracy: A comparative investigation of democracy in multicultural school environments in the Scandinavian capitals. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  10. Biseth, H. (2014). MÅ vi snakke om demokrati? [Do we have to talk about democracy?]. In H. Biseth & J. Madsen (Eds.), MÅ vi snakke om demokratiom demokratisk praksis i skolen [Do we have to talk about democracy? About democratic practice in school] (pp. 25–42). Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  11. Børhaug, K. (2007). Oppseding til demokrati. Ei studie av politisk oppseding i norsk skule [Being raised for democracy. A study of political education in Norwegian schools]. Doctoral Dissertation. Universitetet i Bergen, Norway. http://bora.uib.no/handle/1956/2601.
  12. Carr, P. (2008). Educators and education for democracy: Moving beyond “thin” democracy. Interamerican Journal of Education for Democracy, 1(2), 147–164.Google Scholar
  13. Carr, P. (2011). Does your vote count? Critical pedagogy and democracy. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Council of Europe. (2010). Charter on education for democratic citizenship and human rights education. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016803034e5.
  15. Council of Europe. (2016). Competences for democratic culture. Living together as equals in culturally diverse societies. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/Source/competences/CDC_en.pdf.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Denzin, N. K. (2009). Critical pedagogy and democratic life or a radical democratic pedagogy. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, 9(3), 379–397.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (1997). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. (Original work published 1916). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  20. Dürr, K. (2005). The school: A democratic learning community. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  21. Education Act. (1998). Opplæringsloven. Lov 27.11.1998 om grunnskolen og den videregående opplæringa [Education Act]. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/education-act/id213315/.
  22. Eikeland, H. (2013). Historie og demokratisk dannelse [History and democratic formation]. Kristiansand: Portal.Google Scholar
  23. Englund, T. (2007). Skola för deliberativ kommunikation [School for deliberative communication]. In E. Tomas (Ed.), Utbildning som kommunikation: deliberativa samtal som möjlighet [Education as communication: Deliberative conversations as opportunity] (pp. 153–168). Göteborg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  24. Eriksen, E. O., & Weigård, J. (1999). Kommunikativ handling og deliberativt demokrati [Communicative action and deliberative democracy]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  25. Fischman, G. E., & Haas, E. (2012). Beyond idealized citizenship education: Embodied cognition, metaphors and democracy. Review of Research in Education, 36, 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  27. Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  28. Gandin, L. A., & Apple, M. W. (2002). Thin versus thick democracy in education: Porto Alegre and the creation of alternatives to neo-liberalism. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 12(2), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habermas, J. (1995). Kommunikativt handlande [Communicative action]. Gøteborg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  30. Huang, L., & Biseth, H. (2016). Openness in Scandinavian classrooms: Student perceptions of teaching practices and high achievers of civic knowledge. Creative Education, 7(5), 713–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koritzinsky, T. (2014). Samfunnskunnskap. Fagdidaktisk innføring [Social studies]. 4. utgave. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  32. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2010). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [The qualitative interview]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
  33. Løvlie, L. (2007). Utbildning för deliberativ demokrati [Education for deliberative democracy]. In T. Englund (Ed.), Utbildning som kommunikationDeliberative samtal som möjlighet [Education as communication—Deliberative conversations as possibility]. Göteborg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  34. Lund, D., & Carr, P. (2008). Introduction: Scanning democracy. In D. Lund & P. Carr (Eds.), Doing democracy. Striving for political literacy and social justice (pp. 1–33). New York: Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Mathé, N. E. H. (2016). Students’ understanding of the concept of democracy and implications for teacher education in social studies. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mikkelsen, R., Buk-Berge, E., Ellingsen, H., Fjeldstad, D., & Sund, A. (2001). Demokratisk beredskap og engasjement hos 9. klassinger i Norge og 27 andre land: Civic Education Study Norge 2001 [Democratic competencies and engagement with 9th graders in Norway and 27 other countries]. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
  37. Mikkelsen, R., Fjeldstad, D., & Ellingsen, H. (2002). Demokratisk beredskap og engasjement hos elever i videregående skole i Norge og 13 andre land: Civic Education Study Norge 2002 [Democratic competencies and engagement with upper secondary school students in Norway and 13 other countries]. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
  38. NOU. (2015). The school of the future—Renewal of subjects and competences. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  39. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, OCHCR. (1989). The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf.
  41. Osler, A. (2014). Identitet, demokrati og mangfold i skoler: nasjonale og internasjonale perspektiver [Identity, democracy and pluralism in schools: National and international perspectives]. In H. Biseth & J. Madsen (Eds.), Må vi snakke om demokrati? [Do we have to talk about democracy?] (pp. 46–62). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  42. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pettersvold, M. (2013). Demokratiforståelser og barns demokratiske deltakelse i barnehagen [Understandings of democracy and the democratic participation of children in kindergarten]. Nordic Studies in Education, 34, 127–147.Google Scholar
  44. Pettersvold, M. (2015). Barns demokratiske deltakelse i barnehagen. Fordring og utfordring [Children’s democratic participation in kindergarten]. Lillehammer: Høgskolen i Lillehammer.Google Scholar
  45. Ringdal, K. (2001). Enhet og mangfold. Samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning og kvantitativ metode [Unity and plurality. Social science research and quantitative methods]. Trondheim: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS.Google Scholar
  46. Schuck, P. H. (2002). Liberal citizenship. In E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of citizenship studies (pp. 131–144). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Solhaug, T., & Børhaug, K. (2012). Skolen i demokratiet-demokratiet i skolen [School in democracy—Democracy in school]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  48. Stray, J. H. (2010). Demokratisk medborgerskap i norsk skole? En kritisk analyse [Democratic citizenship in the Norwegian school? A critical analysis]. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
  49. Stray, J. H. (2011). Demokrati på timeplanen [Democracy at the schedule]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  50. Telhaug, A. O., & Mediaas, O. A. (2003). Grunnskolen som nasjonsbygger. Fra statspietisme til nyliberalisme [Primary school as nation-building. From state pietism towards neoliberalism]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.Google Scholar
  51. Tønnesen, R., & Tønnesen, M. (2007). Demokratisk dannelse [Democratic formation]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  52. UDIR. (2006). Prinsipper for opplæringa [Principles for education]. http://www.udir.no/Lareplaner/Kunnskapsloftet/Prinsipp-for-opplaringa/.
  53. UDIR. (2013). Social studies subject curriculum (SAF1-03). http://www.udir.no/kl06/SAF1-03/Hele/Kompetansemaal/?lplang=eng.
  54. UDIR. Utdanningsdirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (1993). Core curriculum and the quality framework. http://www.udir.no/globalassets/upload/larerplaner/generell_del/5/core_curriculum_english.pdf.
  55. UDIR. Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2015). Fag- og timefordeling og tilbudsstruktur for Kunnskapsløftet Udir-1-2015. [Distribution of subjects and classes for knowledge lift]. http://www.udir.no/Regelverk/Finn-regelverk-for-opplaring/Finn-regelverk-etter-tema/Innhold-i-opplaringen/Udir-1-2015-Kunnskapsloftet-fag–og-timefordeling-og-tilbudsstruktur/Udir-1-2015-Vedlegg-1/2-Grunnskolen/#a2.1.3.
  56. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. White Paper 28. (2015–2016). Fag-fordypning-forståelse [Subject-specialization-understanding]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  58. Young, I. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Culture, Religion and Social StudiesUniversity of South Eastern NorwayDrammenNorway

Personalised recommendations