Ball, S. (1993). Education markets, choice and social class: The market as a class strategy in the UK and the US. British Journal of Sociology of Education,
Ball, S. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
Barton, L. (1995). The politics of education for all. Support for Learning,
Bastiani, J. (1993). Parents as partners: Genuine progress or empty rhetoric? In P. Munn (Ed.), Parents and schools: Customers, mangers or partners (pp. 101–116). London: Routledge.
Blackmore, J., & Hutchison, K. (2010). Ambivalent relations: The ‘tricky footwork’ of parental involvement in school communities. International Journal of Inclusive Education,
14(5), 499–515. doi:10.1080/13603110802657685.
Bosetti, L. (2005). School choice: Public education at a crossroad. American Journal of Education: School Choice,
Bosetti, L., & Pyryt, M. (2007). Parental motivation in school choice. Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform,
Bourdieu, P. (1974). School as a conservative force: scholastic and cultural inequalities. In J. Eggleston (Ed.), Contemporary research in the sociology of education (pp. 32–46). London: Methuen.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. (R. Nice, Trans.). In A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, society (pp. 46–58). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Reprinted from Handbook of theory of research for the sociology of education, pp. 241–258, by J. Richardson, Ed., 1986, Westport, CT: Greenword Press).
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Brown, P. (1990). The ‘third wave’: Education and the ideology of parentocracy. British Journal of Sociology of Education,
Brown, P. (1995). Cultural capital and social exclusion: Some observations on recent trends in education, employment and the labour market. Work, Employment & Society,
Brown, P. (2000). The globalisation of positional competition? Sociology,
Canadian Council on Learning (CCL). (2007). 2007 Survey of Canadian attitudes toward learning: Results for elementary and secondary school learning. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Council on Learning. Retrieved from http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/SCAL/2007/SCAL_Report_English_final.pdf.
Chen, H. (2013). Micro-political analysis of the principal selection in a Taiwanese elementary school. Educational Research and Reviews,
Coffey, A. (2001). Education and social change. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Coleman, J. (1997). Social capital in the creation of human capital. In A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, society (pp. 80–95). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Reprinted from American Journal of Sociology, pp. S95–S120, 94, Supplement 1988).
Comer, J., & Haynes, N. (1991). Parental involvement in schools: An ecological approach. Elementary School Journal: Special Issue: Educational Partnerships: Home-School Community,
Conway, S. (1997). The reproduction of exclusion and disadvantage: Symbolic violence and social class inequalities in ‘parental choice’ of secondary education. Sociological Research Online, 2(4). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/4/4.html.
Crozier, G. (1999). Parental involvement: Who wants it? International Studies in Sociology of Education,
David, M. (1993). Parents, gender and educational reform. Cambridge: Polity.
David, M. (1995). Parental wishes versus parental choice. History of Education,
David, M., West, A., & Ribbens, J. (1994). Mother’s intuition? Choosing secondary schools. London, UK: Falmer.
Davies, S. (2004). School choice by default? Understanding the demand for private tutoring in Canada. American Journal of Education,
Davies, S., Aurini, J., & Quirke, L. (2002). New markets for private education in Canada. Education Canada,
Dehli, K. (2009). ‘Race’, ‘parents’, and education policy discourse in Ontario. In C. Levine-Rasky (Ed.), Canadian perspectives on the sociology of education (pp. 323–337). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Demerath, P. (2009). Producing success. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dom, L., & Verhoeven, J. (2006). Partnership and conflict between parents and schools: How are schools reacting to the new participation law in Flanders (Belgium)? Journal of Education Policy,
Donahoo, S. (2009). Further deferring the dream: How privileged parents prevent the effectiveness of affirmative action. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 53rd Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, Charleston, SC. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p297862_index.html.
Eckler, R. (2015, April 12). The new tutor dynasty. Maclean’s. Retrieved from http://www.macleans.ca/education/the-new-tutor-dynasty/.
Epstein, J. (1983). Longitudinal effects of family–school–person interactions on student outcomes. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization,
Epstein, J. (2005). Attainable goals? The spirit and letter of the No Child Left Behind Act on parent involvement. Sociology of Education,
Evans, M. (2014). Soccer Moms UNITE! Affluent families and the utilization of grassroots strategies for education reform. Interchange,
Fine, M. (1997). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. In A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, society (pp. 460–475). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Reprinted from Teachers College Record, pp. 682–710, 94, 1993).
Fujita, H. (2010). Whither Japanese schooling? Educational reforms and their impact on ability formation and educational opportunity. In J. Gordon (Ed.), Challenges to Japanese education: Economics and human rights (pp. 17–53). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Government of Canada. (1982). Canadian charter of rights and freedoms. Retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/CH37-4-3-2002E.pdf.
Hardin, G. (1999). The tragedy of the commons. In Mark J. Smith (Ed.), Thinking through the environment: A reader (pp. 251–259). New York, NY: Routledge.
Herman, J., & Yeh, J. (1983). Some effects of parent involvement in schools. The Urban Review,
Hess, R., & Holloway, S. (1984). Family and school as educational institutions. In R. Parke (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 7, pp. 179–222)., The family Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hoover-Dempsey, K., & Sandler, H. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research,
67(3), 3–42. doi:10.3102/00346543067001003.
Hutchins, A. (2015). Just say ‘non’: The problem with French immersion. Maclean’s, 128(12), 16–20. Retrieved from http://www.macleans.ca/education/just-say-non-the-problem-with-french-immersion.
Kachur, J. (1999). Privatizing public choice: The rise of charter schooling in Alberta. In T. Harrison & J. Kachur (Eds.), Contested classrooms: Education, globalization and democracy in Alberta (pp. 107–122). Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta Press.
Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education,
Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lareau, A., & Cox, A. (2011). Social class and the transition to adulthood: Differences in parents’ interactions with institutions. In M. Carlson & P. England (Eds.), Social class and changing families in an unequal America (pp. 134–164). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lareau, A., & McNamara Horvat, E. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education,
Lareau, A., & Munoz, V. (2012). “You’re not going to call the shots”: Structural conflicts between the principal and the PTO at a suburban public elementary school. Sociology of Education,
85(3), 201–218. doi:10.1177/0038040711435855.
Lareau, A., & Shumar, W. (1996). The problem of individualism in family-school policies. Sociology of Education: Extra Issue: Special Issue on Sociology and Educational Policy: Bringing Scholarship and Practice Together,
Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. (2008). Class and the transition to adulthood. In A. Lareau & D. Conley (Eds.), Social class: How does it work? (pp. 118–151). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Madzanire, D., & Mashava, R. (2012). Dangerous schools and the rise of parentocracy. Journal of Sociological Research,
Makropoulos, J. (2009). Gaining access to late French-immersion programs: Class-based perspectives of Canadian students in an Ottawa high school. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education,
32(3), 317–330. doi:10.1090/152358809003378941.
Manitoba Education. (2014). Schools in Manitoba: Schools of choice. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/schools/choice/.
Martin, N. (2014, November 17). WSD chairman spurns idea of school swap: French program running our of program space. Winnipeg Free Press. Retrieved from http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/wsd-chairman-spurns-idea-of-school-swap-282901881.html.
Martin, N. (2015, June 29). French-language education needs prompt action: St. James-Assiniboia eyes more changes. Winnipeg Free Press. Retrieved from http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/french-language-education-needs-prompt-action-310589491.html.
Mattingly, D., Prislin, R., McKenzie, T., Rodriguez, J., & Kayzar, B. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement in programs. Review of Educational Research,
McNamara Horvat, E., Weininger, E., & Lareau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal,
Okuma-Nyström, M. K. (2005). Limited freedom of choice: Cases of high schools in Stockholm and Tokyo. Education and Society,
Ong, A. (2014, Mar. 30). Beware growing ‘parentocracy’: NIE don. The Sunday Times. Retrieved from http://4i14i2el2014.wiki.hci.edu.sg/file/view/20140330-st-beware-growing-parentocracy.pdf.
Paquette, J. (2005). Public funding for “private” education: The equity challenge of enhanced choice. American Journal of Education: School choice,
Poikolainen, J. (2012). A case study of parents’ school choice strategies in a Finnish urban context. European Educational Research Journal,
Power, S., & Whitty, G. (2006). Education and the middle class: A complex but crucial case for the sociology of education. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. Dillabough, & A. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization and social change (pp. 446–453). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Smala, S., Paz, J., & Lingard, B. (2013). Languages, cultural capital and school choice: Distinction and second-language immersion programmes. British Journal of Sociology of Education,
Swedberg, R. (2001). Sociology and game theory: Contemporary and historical perspectives. Theory and Society,
Tett, L., & Crowther, J. (1998). Families at a disadvantage: Class, culture and literacies. British Educational Research Journal,
Troman, G. (2000). Teacher stress in the low-trust society. British Journal of Sociology of Education,
21(3), 331–353. doi:10.1080/713655357.
Turner, R. (1960). Sponsored and contest ability and the school system. American Sociological Review,
van Zanten, A. (2005). New modes of reproducing social inequality in education: the changing roles of parents, teachers, schools and educational policies. European Educational Research Journal,
van Zanten, A., & Darchy-Koechlin, B. (2005). Parentocracie et marché contre méritocratie. Le Monde de l’éducation,
Warrington, M. (2005). Mirage in the desert? Access to educational opportunities in an area of social exclusion. Antipode,
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press (Original work published in 1956).
Weininger, E., & Lareau, A. (2003). Translating Bourdieu into the American context: the question of social class and family-school relations. Poetics,
31(5–6), 375–402. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00034-2.
Weis, L., & Cipollone, A. (2013). ‘Class work’: Producing privilege and social mobility in elite US secondary schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education,
34(5–6), 701–722. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.816037.
West, A., David, M., Hailes, J., & Ribbens, J. (1995). Parents and the process for choosing secondary schools: Implications for schools. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership,
23(1), 28–38. doi:10.1177/174114329502300104.
Windle, J. (2009). The limits of school choice: some implications for accountability of selective practices and positional competition in Australian education. Critical Studies in Education,
50(3), 231–246. doi:10.1080/17508480903009566.
Wrigley, J. (2000). Foreword. In A. Lareau (Ed.), Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education (pp. viii–xvi). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
Yamashita, J. & Ohmori, A. (2009). Assessing the evidence of school choice: A case study of Japan using a statistical model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 53rd Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, Charleston, SC. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p302778_index.html.