Interchange

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Lifelong Learning Between “East” and “West”: Confucianism and the Reflexive Project of the Self

Article

Abstract

Current theory, policy, and practice of lifelong learning are strongly influenced by ideas about the transformations that are taking place in contemporary societies. One influential set of ideas emphasizes that because of the rapid changes that are taking place in the (late-) modern world and because of the erosion of traditions, there is a constant need for individuals not only to learn new skills and knowledge in order to be able to adjust themselves to the changes, but also to reflexively (re)construct one’s self. Anthony Giddens has referred to this as the “reflexive project of the self.” It thus becomes a lifelong learning task. In this paper we raise some critical questions about Giddens’s views and their implications for lifelong learning. On the one hand we show, using ideas from Charles Taylor, that the construction of the self does not necessarily have to be understood in the reflexive and individualistic terms suggested by Giddens. With Taylor we argue for the importance of the social, moral, and intersubjective dimensions of the construction of the self. Against this background we then discuss ideas from Confucianism that also highlight the social, moral, and intersubjective dimensions of understanding the self. The latter view is not simply a theoretical option but actually continues to influence the ways in which a large part of the world population views their lives and their selves. Both for theoretical and practical reasons we therefore suggest that there is a need to take a broader outlook on what the personal dimensions of lifelong learning in contemporary society might look like.

Keywords

Lifelong learning self identity late–modernity morality ethics individualism West East Confucianism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aspin D., Chapman J. (2001) Towards a philosophy of lifelong learning. In: Aspin D., Chapman J., Hatton M., Sawano Y. (eds) International handbook of lifelong learning, Part 1. London, UK, Kluwer Academic PubishersGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagnall R.G. (2000) Lifelong learning and the limitations of economic determinism. International Journal of Lifelong Education 19(1): 20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagnall R.G. (2006) Lifelong learning and the limits of tolerance. International Journal of Lifelong Education 25(3): 257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biesta G.J.J. (2006) What’s the point of lifelong learning if lifelong learning has no point? On the democratic deficit of policies for lifelong learning. European Educational Research Journal 5(3–4): 169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards R. (2003) Lifelong learning, lifelong learning, lifelong learning: The recurrent education?. In: Field J., Leicester M. (eds) Lifelong learning: Education across the lifespan. London, UK, RoutledgeFalmer, pp 3–11Google Scholar
  6. Edwards R., Ranson S., Strain M. (2002) Reflexivity: Towards a theory of lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education 21(6): 525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Field, J. (2000). Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham.Google Scholar
  8. Field J., Leicester M. (2003) Introduction: Lifelong learning or permanent schooling?. In: Field J., Leicester M. (eds) Lifelong learning: Education across the lifespan. London UK, RoutledgeFalmer, pp xvi–xixGoogle Scholar
  9. Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self–identity: Self and society in the latemodern age. Polity Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Hake B. (1998) Lifelong learning and European Union: A critique from “risk society” perspective. In: Holford J., Jarvis P., Griffin C. (eds) International perspectives on lifelong learning. London, UK, Routledge, pp 32–43Google Scholar
  11. Hake B. (1999) Lifelong learning in late-modernity: The challenges to society, organizations, and individuals. Adult Education Quarterly 49(2): 79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Künzel K. (2003) Europe and lifelong learning: Investigating the political and educational rationale of expansionism. In: Field J., Leicester M. (eds) Lifelong learning: Education across the lifespan. London, UK, RoutledgeFalmer, pp 201–212Google Scholar
  13. Kyung Hi K. (2004) An attempt to elucidate notions of lifelong learning: Analects–based analysis of Confucius’ ideas about learning. Asia Pacific Education Review 5(2): 117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Legge, J. (1971). Confucian analects, The great learning, and the doctrine of the mean. New York: Dover Books. (Original publication 1893) Retrieved 16/04/2009 from http://afpc.asso.fr/wengu/wg/wengu.php?l=Zhongyong&s=1
  15. Sennett R. (1999) The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Sun Q. (2004) To be Ren and Jun Zi: A Confucian perspective on the practice of contemporary education. The Journal of Thought 39(2): 77–91Google Scholar
  17. Sun Q. (2008) Confucian educational philosophy and its implication for lifelong learning and lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education 27(5): 559–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Taylor C. (1985) Philosophical papers I: Human agency and language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor C. (1989) Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang W. (2008) Conceptions of lifelong learning in Confucian culture: Their impact on adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education 27(5): 551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of StirlingStirlingScotland, United Kingdom

Personalised recommendations