Skip to main content
Log in

Participation Making a Difference? Critical Analysis of the Participatory Claims of Change, Reversal, and Empowerment

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participation has become very popular as a new strategy and approach in research, in policy, in private and public affairs. As an alternative to top-down approaches participation promises to empower people, to acknowledge and to build competence and (local) knowledge, to recognise and to be responsive to people’s different and differentiated needs and interests. The difference participation promises to make concerns above all an engagement with questions of difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACP-EU Partnership Agreement signed in Cotonou (2000). The ACP-EU Courier, Special issue.

  • Dimensions of empowerment (1998), Integra Review, 5.

  • The World Bank Participation Sourcebook (1996). Washington: World Bank.

  • Bachrach P., Botwinick A. (1992). Power and empowerment. A radical theory of participatory democracy. Philadelphia, Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookman A., Morgan S. (1988). Women and the politics of empowerment. Philadelphia, Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bröckling U. (2003). You are not responsible for being down, but you are responsible for getting up. Über empowerment. Leviathan, 3.

  • Bröckling U., Krasmann S., Lemke T. (2000). Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. (1994a). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development 22(9): 1253-1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. (1994b). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development 22(10): 1437-1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. (1994c). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 22(7): 953-969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts? [Discussion paper 347]. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

  • Chambers R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London, Intermediate Technology Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver F. (1999). Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development 11(4): 597-612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A. (2000). Making a difference? Gender and participatory development [IDS discussion paper 378]. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

  • Cornwall A., Musyoki S., & Pratt G. (1999). Reflections on PRA and participation in Kenya. Feedback from the Pathways to Participation consultative meetings’. Retrieved October, 10, 2002, from http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/particip/research/path/kenya.pdf.

  • Crewe E., Harrison E. (1998). Whose development ? An ethnography of aid. London, Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank B. (1999). The will to empower. Democratic citizens and other subjects. New York, Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R.I., Romm N.R.A. (1996). Triple loop learning. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. (1978). La "gouvernementalité". D. Defert F. Ewald, & J. Lagrange (Eds.), Foucault. Dits et écrits II, 1976-1988 (pp. 635-657). Paris: Quarto Gallimard.

  • Foucault M. (1981). Omnes et singulatim. Towards a criticism of ’political reason’ S. M. McMurrin (Ed.), The Tanner lectures on human values (pp. 223-254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Foucault M. (1982). The subject and power. H. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Gordon C. (1991). Governmental rationality: an introduction. G. Burchell C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (pp. 1-51). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Hunter I. (1994). Rethinking the school Subjectivity, bureaucracy, criticism. St Leonards, Allen & Unwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein J., Simons M. (2002). An adequate education in a globalised world? A note on immunisation against being-together. Journal of Philosophy of Education 36(4): 589-608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan D., Chambers R., Shah M.K., Petesh P. (2000). Voices of the poor Crying out for change. New York, Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan D., Patel R., Schafft K., Rademacher A., Koch-Schulte S. (1999). Voices of the poor. Can anyone hear us?. New York, World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan D., Stern N., Nankani G. (2002). Empowerment and poverty reduction: A sourcebook. Washington, World Bank

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley P. (1995). People’s participation in development projects [Occasional Papers Series Number 7]. Oxford: INTRAC.

  • Onyx J., & Benton P. (1995). Empowerment and ageing. Toward honoured places for crones and sages. G. Craig & M. Mayo (Eds.), Community empowerment. A reader in participation and development (pp. 46-58). London: Zed Books.

  • Rahman M. A. (1995). Participatory development : Toward liberation or cooptation? G. Craig, & M. Mayo (Eds.), Community empowerment. A reader in participation and development (pp. 24-32). London/New Jersey: Zed Books .

  • Reich M.R. (Ed.). (2002). Public-private partnerships for public health. Cambridge: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies.

  • Rose N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Reframing political thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh N., Titi V. (1995) Empowerment Towards sustainable development. London, Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Masschelein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masschelein, J., Quaghebeur, K. Participation Making a Difference? Critical Analysis of the Participatory Claims of Change, Reversal, and Empowerment. Interchange 37, 309–331 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-9006-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-9006-8

Keywords

Navigation