This paper explores the wide range of mathematics content and processes that arise in the secondary classroom via the use of unusual counting problems. A universal pedagogical goal of mathematics teachers is to convey a sense of unity among seemingly diverse topics within mathematics. Such a goal can be accomplished if we could conduct classroom discourse that conveys the Lakatosian (thought-experimental) view of mathematics as that of continual conjecture-proof-refutation which involves rich mathematizing experiences. I present a pathway towards this pedagogical goal by presenting student insights into an unusual counting problem and by using these outcomes to construct ideal mathematical possibilities (content and process) for discourse. In particular, I re-construct the quasi-empirical approaches of six!4-year old students’ attempts to solve this unusual counting problem and present the possibilities for mathematizing during classroom discourse in the imaginative spirit of Imre Lakatos. The pedagogical implications for the teaching and learning of mathematics in the secondary classroom and in mathematics teacher education are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Australian Education Council. (1990). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne, VC: Australian Educational Council.
Bohman, T. (1996). A sum packing problem of Erdos and the Conway-Guy sequence. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 124(12),3627–3636.
Brodkey, J.J. (1996). Starting a Euclid club. Mathematics Teacher, 89(5), 386–388.
Dienes, Z.P. (1960). Building up mathematics. London: Hutchinson Education.
Dienes, Z.P. (1961). An experimental study of mathematics learning. New York: Hutchinson & Co Ltd.
Doerr, H. & Lesh, R. (2003). A modeling perspective on teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond Constructivism (pp.125–125). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
English, L.D. (1998). Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83–206.
English, L.D. (1999). Assessing for structural understanding in children’s combinatorial problem solving. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(4),63–82.
Fawcett, H.P. (1938). The nature of proof. Thirteenth yearbook of the NCTM. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Fomin, D., Genkin, S., & Itenberg, I. (1996). Mathematical Circles (Russian Experience). American Mathematical Society.
Gardner, M. (1997). The last recreations. New York: Springer-Verlag. Goldbach, C. (1742) Letter to L. Euler, June 7,1742. Retrieved January 11, 2004 from http://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~joerg/pic/g-letter.jpg
Guy, R.K. (1982). Sets of integers whose subsets have distinct sums, Theory and practice of combinatorics, Annals of discrete math, 12, 141–154. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Hogendijk, J.P. (1996). Een workshop over Iraanse mozaïken. Nieuwe Wiskrant, 16(2), 38–42.
Hung, D. (1998) Meanings, contexts and mathematical thinking: the meaning-context model. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(3),311–344.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lesh, R. & Doerr, H. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism (pp. 3–34). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lewis, B. (2003). Taking perspective. The Mathematical Gazette, 87(510),418–431.
Maher, C.A. & Kiczek, R.D. (2000). Long term building of mathematical ideas related to proof making. Contributions to Paolo Boero, G. Harel, C. Maher, M. Miyasaki (organisers), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education. ICME9 -TSG 12. Tokyo/Makuhari, Japan.
Maher, C.A. & Martino A.M. (1996a) The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5-year case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 194–244.
Maher C.A.& Martino A.M. (1996b) Young children invent methods of proof: The “Gang of Four.” In P.Nesher, L.P. Steffe, P. Cobb, B. Greer & J. Goldin (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning, (pp. 431–447). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maher, C.A., & Martino, A.M. (1997) Conditions for conceptual change: From pattern recognition to theory posing. In H. Mansfield (Ed.), Young children and mathematics: concepts and their representations. Durham, NH: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
Maher, C.A. & Speiser, B. (1997). How far can you go with block towers? Stephanie’s intellectual development. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 16(2),125–132.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics: Reston, VA: NCTM.
Rotman, B. (1977). Jean Piaget: Psychologist of the real. Cornell University Press.
Sriraman, B. (2003a). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving, and the ability to formulate generalizations. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(3), 151–165.
Sriraman, B. (2003b). Can mathematical discovery fill the existential void? The use of conjecture, proof and refutation in a high school classroom. Mathematics in School, 32(2),2–6.
Sriraman, B. (2004a). Discovering a mathematical principle: The case of Matt. Mathematics in School, 33(2),25–31.
Sriraman, B. (2004b). Reflective abstraction, uniframes and formulation of generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 205–222.
Sriraman, B. (2004c). Discovering Steiner triple systems through problem solving. The Mathematics Teacher, 97(5),320–326.
Sriraman, B. (2004d). Re-creating the renaissance. In M. Anaya, C. Michelsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the topic study group 21 -Relations between mathematics and others subjects of art and science: The 10 th International Congress of Mathematics Education, Copenhagen, Denmark (pp. 14–19).
Sriraman, B. & Adrian, H. (2004a). The pedagogical value and the interdisciplinary nature of inductive processes in forming generalizations. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 35(4), 407–422.
Sriraman, B. & English, L. (2004a). Combinatorial mathematics: Research into practice. Connecting research into teaching. The Mathematics Teacher, 98(3),182–191.
Sriraman, B. & Strzelecki, P. (2004a). Playing with powers. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 29–39.
Van Maanen, J. (1992). Teaching geometry to 11 year old “medieval lawyers.” The Mathematical Gazette, 76(475), 37–45.
Wheeler, D. (2001). Mathematisation as a pedagogical tool. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(2), 50–53.
About this article
Cite this article
Sriraman, B. An Ode to Imre Lakatos: Quasi-Thought Experiments to Bridge the Ideal and Actual Mathematics Classrooms. Interchange 37, 151–178 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-8405-1
- mathematical structures
- problem solving
- teacher education