Human body communication is non-radio frequency technique of wireless body area network, wherein the human body is used as a communication medium in two coupling methods namely: capacitive and galvanic coupling. HBC is relatively new method and in full development, given the large number of scientific publishing works depending on different setup and equipment. Even that it remains controversial with no consensus in terms of propagation characteristics and behavior mechanism. This paper deals with the common used test equipment and configuration attempting to provide a complementary information about HBC channel characterization issue. For that, in vivo measurements were carried out using several assembling of equipment in different scenarios, considering the conventional inspected parameters (channel length, transverse distance and balun insertion scenarios). The measurements were conducted in both frequency and time domain using primarily spectrum/vector network analyzer and digital oscilloscope respectively. Thus, in addition to transmission losses between transceivers across the channel (calculated path loss factor), phase angle information are considered over the operating frequency band to assert the non-dispersive HBC channel nature. Further harmonic distortion effect is shown, then high transmission power for the signal of interest is attributed to HBC methods according to the calculated total harmonic distortion THD metric, even harmonics resulting from the channel non-linearity characteristics or transceivers signal/apparatus imperfections. The experimental setups highlights the important to consider the precise criteria for measurement purpose, thus leading using the most appropriate test apparatus.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
I. Ahmed, H. Karvonen, T. Kumpuniemi, M. Katz, Wireless communications for the hospital of the future: Requirements, challenges and solutions, International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 4–17, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-019-00468-1.
A. Bohloulzadeh, M. Rajaei, A survey on congestion control protocols in wireless sensor networks, International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 365–384, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-020-00479-3.
K. Sayrafian-Pour, W.-B. Yang, J. Hagedorn, J. Terrill, K. Y. Yazdandoost, K. Hamaguchi, Channel models for medical implant communication, International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 17, No. (3–4, pp. 105–112, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-010-0124-y.
D. K. Rout, S. Das, Multiple narrowband interference cancellation in high data rate UWB body area networks using hybrid hermite pulses, International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 252–261, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-015-0275-y.
J. Wang, K. Han, A. Alexandridis, Z. Zilic, Y. Pang, W. Wu, S. Din, G. Jeon, A novel security scheme for body area networks compatible with smart vehicles, Computer Networks, Vol. 143, pp. 74–81, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.005.
H. Baldus, S. Corroy, A. Fazzi, K. Klabunde, T. Schenk, Human-centric connectivity enabled by body-coupled communications, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 47, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.5116816.
M. Kompara, M. Hölbl, Survey on security in intrabody area network communication, Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 70, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.11.006.
S. Jingjing, W. Jianqing, Human Body Communication Based Wearable Technology for Vital Signal Sensing, Ch. 11, pp. 215–233, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811810-8.00011-7.
J. Petäjäjärvi, K. Mikhaylov, R. Vuohtoniemi, H. Karvonen, J. Iinatti, On the human body communications: wake-up receiver design and channel characterization, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-016-0674-5.
D. Muramatsu, Y. Yokoyama, K. Sasaki, Clarification of transmission mechanism in human body communication between head-mounted wearable devices with detailed model, in: 2014 International Conference on Electronics Packaging (ICEP), IEEE, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/icep.2014.6826779.
M. S. Wegmueller, M. Oberle, N. Felber, N. Kuster, W. Fichtner, Signal transmission by galvanic coupling through the human body, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 59, pp. 963–969, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2009.2031449.
T. Zimmerman, Personal area networks (pan): Nearfield intra-body communication, Master’s thesis, MIT, 1996.
F. Maamir, S. Tedjini, R. Touhami, M. Guiatni, Complementary in-vivo measurements for human body communication, in: 2017 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes (ICEE-B), IEEE, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/icee-b.2017.8192153.
J. Bae, H.-J. Yoo, The effects of electrode configuration on body channel communication based on analysis of vertical and horizontal electric dipoles, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 1409–1420, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmtt.2015.2402653.
M. Li, Y. Song, W. Li, G. Wang, T. Bu, Y. Zhao, Q. Hao, The modeling and simulation of the galvanic coupling intra-body communication via handshake channel, Sensors, Vol. 17, No. 4, p. 863, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040863.
M. A. Callejon, J. Reina-Tosina, D. Naranjo Hernandez, L. M. Roa, Measurement issues in galvanic intrabody communication: Influence of experimental setup, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 62, No. 11, pp. 2724–2732, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2015.2444916.
M. A. Callejon, D. Naranjo-Hernandez, J. ReinaTosina, L. M. Roa, A comprehensive study into intrabody communication measurements, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 62, No. 9, pp. 2446–2455, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2013.2258766.
Y. Song, Q. Hao, K. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Chu, B. Kang, The simulation method of the galvanic coupling intrabody communication with different signal transmission paths, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 1257–1266, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2010.2087870.
X. Chen, P. Mak, S. Pun, Y. Gao, C. Lam, M. Vai, M. Du, Study of channel characteristics for galvanictype intra-body communication based on a transfer function from a quasistatic field model, Sensors, Vol. 12, pp. 16433–16450, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/s121216433.
J. Sakai, L. Wu, H. Sun, Y. Guo, Balun’s effect on the measurement of transmission characteristics for intrabody communication channel, in: 2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Technologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications (IMWS-BIO), pp. 1–3, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMWS-BIO.2013.6756245.
B. Kibret, M. Seyedi, D. T. H. Lai, M. Faulkner, The effect of tissues in galvanic coupling intrabody communication, in: 2013 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, pp. 318–323, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSNIP.2013.6529809.
L. Xia, S. Redfield, P. Chiang, Experimental characterization of a uwb channel for body area networks, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/703239.
J. Hwang, T. Kang, J. Kwon, S. Park, Effect of electromagnetic interference on human body communication, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 59, No, 1, pp. 48–57, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2016.2598582.
K. Oh, T. W. Kang, S. E. Kim, H.-I. Park, I. G. Lim, S. Kang, Low-noise inducing rx for human body communication, IET Journals and Magazines, Vol. 52, No. 21, pp. 1740–1742, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2016.2825.
J. Bae, H. Cho, K. Song, H. Lee, H. Yoo, The signal transmission mechanism on the surface of human body for body channel communication, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 582–593, (2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2011.2178857.
R. D’Errico, L. Ouvry, A statistical model for onbody dynamic channels, International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 17, No. 3–4, pp. 92–104, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-010-0122-0.
M. Seyedi, B. Kibret, D. Lai, M. Faulkner, An empirical comparison of limb joint effects on capacitive and galvanic coupled intra-body communications, pp. 213–218, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSNIP.2013.6529791.
M. Seyedi, D. T. H. Lai, M. Faulkner, Limb joint effects on signal transmission in capacitive coupled intra-body communication systems, in: 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 6699–6702, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347531.
T. Leng, Z. Nie, W. Wang, F. Guan, L. Wang, A human body communication transceiver based on on-off keying modulation, in: International Symposium on Bioelectronics and Bioinformations 2011, pp. 61–64, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBB.2011.6107645.
A. Sasaki, M. Shinagawa, K. Ochiai, Sensitive and stable electro-optic sensor for intrabody communication, in: The 17th Annual Meeting of the IEEELasers and Electro-Optics Society, LEOS 2004, Vol. 1, pp. 122-123, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/LEOS.2004.1363141.
Y. Song, Q. Hao, K. Zhang, J. Wang, X. Jin, H. Sun, Signal transmission in a human body medium-based body sensor network using a mach-zehnder electro-optical sensor, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), Vol. 12, pp. 16557–70, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/s121216557.
F. Maamir, M. Guiatni, S. Tedjini, S. Gaoua, R. Touhami, F. Abed, Optocoupler effect on in-vivo measurements characterization for human body communication, pp. 345–348, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMS.2018.8612129.
A. Ahlbom, U. Bergqvist, J. Bernhardt, J. Cesarini, L. Court, M. Grandolfo, M. Hietanen, A. McKinlay, M. Repacholi, D. Sliney, J. Stolwijk, M. Swicord, L. Szabo, M. Taki, T. Tenforde, H. Jammet, R. Matthes, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 ghz).international commission on nonionizing radiation protection, Health Physics, Vol. 4, pp. 494–521, 1998.
M. Stuchly, Wireless communications and the safety of the user, International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 223–228, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02106589.
D. Jorgesen, C. Marki, A Tutorial on Baluns, Balun Transformers, Magic-Ts, and 180 Hybrids, Marki Microwave Inc., Morgan Hill, CA, 2014.
M. A. Callejon, L. M. Roa, J. Reina-Tosina, D. Naranjo-Hernandez, Study of attenuation and dispersion through the skin in intrabody communications systems, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 159–165, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/titb.2011.2171702.
M. D. Pereira, G. A. Alvarez-Botero, F. R. de Sousa, Characterization and modeling of the capacitive HBC channel, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 64, No. 10, pp. 2626–2635, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2015.2420391.
L.-S. Wu, J. Sakai, H.-C. Sun, Y.-X. Guo, Matching network to improve the transmission level of capacitive intra-body communication (IBC) channels, in: 2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Technologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications (IMWS-BIO), IEEE, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/imws-bio.2013.6756197.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Maamir, F., Touhami, R., Tedjini, S. et al. Human Body Communication In-Vivo Measurement Using Different Test Equipment. Int J Wireless Inf Networks (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-021-00534-7
- Human body communication
- Galvanic coupling
- Capacitive coupling
- In vivo measurement
- Test equipment