Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of LoRa LPWAN Technology for Indoor Remote Health and Wellbeing Monitoring

  • Published:
International Journal of Wireless Information Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long lifetime of a wireless sensor/actuator node, low transceiver chip cost and large coverage area are the main characteristics of the low power wide area network (LPWAN) technologies. These targets correlate well with the requirements imposed by the health and wellbeing applications of the digital age. Therefore, LPWANs can found their niche among traditional short range technologies for wireless body area networks, such as ZigBee, Bluetooth and ultra wideband. To check this hypothesis, in this work we investigate the indoor performance with one of the LPWAN technologies, named LoRa, by the means of empirical measurements. The measurements were conducted using the commercially available devices in the main campus of the University of Oulu, Finland. In order to obtain the comprehensive picture, the experiments were executed for the sensor nodes operating with various physical layer settings, i.e., using the different spreading factors, bandwidths and transmit powers. The obtained results indicate that with the largest spreading factor of 12 and 14 dBm transmit power, the whole campus area (570 m North to South and over 320 m East to West) can be covered by a single base station. The average measured packet success delivery ratio for this case was 96.7%, even with no acknowledgements and retransmissions used. The campus was covered also with lower spreading factors with 2 dBm transmit power, but considerably more packets were lost. For example with spreading factor 8, 13.1% of the transmitted packets were lost. Aside of this, we have investigated the power consumption of the LoRa compliant transceiver with different physical layer settings. The experiments conducted using the specially designed module show that based on the settings used, the amount of energy for sending the same amount of data may differ up to 200-fold. This calls for efficient selection of the communication mode to be used by the energy restricted devices and emphasizes the importance of enabling adaptive data rate control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Hunn: LoRa vs LTE-M vs Sigfox. Available online: http://www.nickhunn.com/lora-vs-lte-m-vs-sigfox/.

  2. S. Movassaghi, M. Abolhasan, J. Lipman, D. Smith, A, Jamalipour: Wireless Body Area Networks: A Survey. IEEE Comm. Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16(3), (2014).

  3. J. Petäjäjärvi, K. Mikhaylov, R. Vuohtoniemi, H. Karvonen, J. Iinatti: On the Human Body Communications: Wake-up Receiver Design and Channel Characterization. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Comm. and Netw., 2016:179, (2016).

  4. E. Kartsakli, A. Lalos, A. Antonopoulos, S. Tennina, M. Di Renzo, L. Alonso, C. Verikoukis: A survey on M2M systems for mHealth: A wireless communications perspective. Sensors, vol. 14, pp. 18009–18052, (2014).

  5. S. Ullah, H. Higgins, B. Braem, B. Latre, C. Blondia, I. Moerman, S. Saleem, Z. Rahman, K. Kwak: A comprehensive survey of wireless body area networks – On PHY, MAC, and Network Layers Solutions. Journal of Med. Syst., vol. 36, pp. 1065–1094, (2012).

  6. R. Sanches-Iborra, M. D. Cano: State of the Art in LP-WAN Solutions for Industrial IoT Services. Sensors 16(5):708, (2016).

  7. A. Augustin, J. Yi, T. Clausen, M. Townsley: A Study of LoRa: Long Range & Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things. Sensors 16(19):1466, (2016).

  8. C. Goursaud, J. M. Gorce: Dedicated Networks for IoT: PHY/MAC State of the Art and Challenges. EAI Endorsed Trans. on Internet of Things (2015).

  9. K. Mikhaylov, J. Petäjäjärvi, T. Hänninen: Analysis of the Capacity and Scalability of the LoRa Wide Area Network Technology. In: European Wireless Conf., Oulu, Finland, 18–20 May (2016).

  10. J. Petäjäjärvi, M. Pettissalo, K. Mikhaylov, A. Roivainen, T. Hänninen: On the coverage of LPWANs: Range Evaluation and Channel Attenuation Model for LoRa Technology, In: ITS Telecommunications, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2–4 Dec. (2015).

  11. J. Petäjäjärvi, K. Mikhaylov, M. Pettissalo, J. Janhunen, J. Iinatti: Performance of a LPWAN based on LoRa Technology: Doppler Robustness, Scalability and Coverage. Conditionally accepted to DWSN.

  12. J. Petäjäjärvi, K. Mikhaylov, M. Hämäläinen, J. Iinatti: Evaluation of LoRa LPWAN Technology for Remote Health and Wellbeing Monitoring. In: ISMICT, Worcester, MA, USA, 21–23 Mar. (2016).

  13. LoRa Alliance: LoRaWAN Specification v.1.0. Jan. (2015).

  14. Semtech: LoRa modulation basics – AN1200.13, Revision 1., Jan. (2015).

  15. T. S. Rappaport: Wireless Communications – Principles and Practices. (IEEE Press, New Jersey, 1996).

  16. Semtech: SX1272/73 – 860 MHz to 1020 MHz Low Power Long Range Transceiver. Datasheet, revision 3, Mar. (2015).

  17. Semtech: SX1272/3/6/7/8 LoRa Modem Design Guide – AN1200.13, Revision 1, July (2013).

  18. A. S. Tanenbaum. Computer Networks: The Medium Access Sublayer, 3rd edn., (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1996), pp. 243–338.

  19. LoRa Alliance: A Technical Overview of LoRa and LoRaWAN, White paper, Nov. (2015).

  20. Semtech: LoRaMote, Revision 2.0, July (2014).

  21. Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority: 15AH/2015M – Regulation on Collective Frequencies for License-exempt Radio Transmitters and on Their Use. Feb. (2015).

  22. Aerial: Biconical Antenna D100-1000.

  23. K. Mikhaylov, J. Petäjäjärvi, M. Mäkeläinen, A. Paatelma, T. Hänninen: Demo - Modular Multi-radio Wireless Sensor Platform for IoT Trials with Plug&Play Module Connection. In: MobiCom, pp. 188-189, Sept. 7–12 (2015).

  24. K. Mikhaylov, J. Petäjäjärvi, M. Mäkeläinen, A. Paatelma, T. Hänninen: Extensible Modular Wireless Sensor and Actuator Network and IoT Platform with Plug&Play Module Connection. In: IPSN, pp. 386-387, Apr. 13–16 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Marko Pettissalo from Nokia for providing the commercial LoRa sensor node and the base station used in this study. This work has been partially funded by the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation (Tekes) through VIRPA C Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Wireless Communications, University of Oulu, Erkki Koiso-Kanttilan katu 3, 90570, Oulu, Finland

    Juha Petäjäjärvi, Konstantin Mikhaylov, Matti Hämäläinen & Jari Iinatti

  2. University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90014, Oulu, Finland

    Rumana Yasmin

Authors
  1. Juha Petäjäjärvi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konstantin Mikhaylov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rumana Yasmin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matti Hämäläinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jari Iinatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juha Petäjäjärvi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petäjäjärvi, J., Mikhaylov, K., Yasmin, R. et al. Evaluation of LoRa LPWAN Technology for Indoor Remote Health and Wellbeing Monitoring. Int J Wireless Inf Networks 24, 153–165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-017-0341-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-017-0341-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation