Advertisement

Career guidance in India based on O*NET and cultural variables

  • Mohit Bhatnagar
Article

Abstract

The Occupational Information Network (O*NET) is the primary source of occupational information in the United States (US). In this study, I review O*NET’s usage for career guidance in India and conceive a career intervention based on it. In an empirical evaluation adopting a posttest-only experimental design with post-graduate management students (N = 220), effectiveness of the career intervention in reducing career decision-making difficulties is presented. An important cultural insight the study offers regarding occurrence of career decision-making difficulties, are the differences due to vertical–horizontal characteristics, apart from the more researched individualism–collectivism characteristics.

Keywords

O*NET Career guidance in India Cultural differences 

Résumé

L’orientation professionnelle en Inde basée sur O*NET et des variables culturelles. L’Occupational Information Network (O*NET) est la source première d’informations occupationnelles aux Etats-Unis (US). Dans cette étude, je passe en revue l’utilisation d’O*NET pour l’orientation professionnelle en Inde et conçoit une intervention de carrière sur cette base. Dans une évaluation empirique se basant uniquement sur une méthode de post-test avec des étudiants de 3ème cycle en management (N = 220), je présente l’efficacité de cette intervention de carrière dans la réduction des difficultés liées au choix. Selon cette étude, les différences observées sont dues aux caractéristiques verticales et horizontales, en plus des caractéristiques d’individualisme et de collectivisme mieux documentées. Cela offre une vision culturelle importante concernant les difficultés de choix de carrière.

Zusammenfassung

Laufbahnberatung in Indien basierend auf O*NET und kulturellen Variablen. Das Berufsinformationsnetzwerk (O*NET) ist die primäre Quelle für berufliche Informationen in den Vereinigten Staaten (USA). In dieser Studie überprüfe ich die Verwendung von O*NET für die Laufbahnberatung in Indien und leite daraus eine Intervention für die Laufbahnentwicklung ab. In einer empirischen Evaluationsstudie mit einem experimentellen posttest-only Design mit postgradualen Management-Studenten (N = 220) wird der Effekt der Intervention auf die Verringerung der Schwierigkeiten bei der beruflichen Entscheidungsfindung präsentiert. Eine wichtige kulturelle Erkenntnis im Zusammenhang mit dem Auftreten von Schwierigkeiten bei der beruflichen Entscheidungsfindung besteht darin, dass die Unterschiede abgesehen von der mehr erforschten Individualismus-Kollektivismus-Dimension auch aufgrund der Dimension vertikal-horizontal entstehen.

Resumen

Orientación profesional en la India basada en el O*NET y variables culturales. El Occupational Information Network (O*NET) es la fuente primaria de información en los Estados Unidos de América. En este estudio se revisa el uso del O*NET en la orientación profesional en la India y se concibe un plan de intervención profesional basado en el mismo. A continuación se presentan los resultados de una evaluación empírica utilizando un diseño experimental con post-test único aplicado a una muestra (N = 220) de estudiantes de postgrado de dirección de empresa sobre la eficacia de la orientación profesional en la reducción de las dificultades en la toma de decisiones profesionales. Finalmente, el estudio nos ofrece una importante concepción cultural en lo que se refiere a la incidencia de las dificultades en la toma de decisiones, que son debidas a las características vertical-horizontal, a parte de las características más investigadas del individualismo-colectivismo.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author intends to commercialize the intellectual property developed as part of his research work.

References

  1. Agarwala, T. (2008). Factors influencing career choice of management students in India. Career Development International, 13(4), 362–376. doi: 10.1108/13620430810880844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arulmani, G. (2007). Counselling psychology in India: At the confluence of two traditions. Applied Psychology, 56(1), 69–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00276.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arulmani, G. (2009). The internationalization of career counselling: Bridging cultural processes and labour market demands in India. Asian Journal of Counselling, 16(2), 149–170.Google Scholar
  4. Borman, W. C., Kubisiak, U. C., & Schneider, R. J. (1999). Work styles. In N. Peterson, M. Mumford, W. Borman, P. Jeanneret, & E. Fleishman (Eds.), The occupation information network (O*NET) (pp. 213–226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, S. D., Ryan Krane, N. E., Brecheisen, J., Castelino, P., Budisin, I., Miller, M., & Edens, L. (2003). Critical ingredients of career choice interventions: More analyses and new hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(3), 411–428. doi: 10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00052-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullock, E. E., Andrews, L., Braud, J., & Reardon, R. C. (2010). Holland’s theory in an international context: Applicability of RIASEC structure and assessments (No. 50). Technical Report, Florida.Google Scholar
  7. Carless, S. A. (1999). Career assessment: Holland’s vocational interests, personality characteristics, and abilities. Journal of Career Assessment, 7(2), 125–144. doi: 10.1177/106907279900700203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, P., & Foster, B. (1977). The career decisions of student teachers. Educational Research and Perspectives, 4(1), 23–33.Google Scholar
  9. Choi, K., & Kim, D. Y. (2013). A cross cultural study of antecedents on career preparation behavior: Learning motivation, academic achievement, and career decision self-efficacy. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 13, 19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dik, B. J., & Steger, M. F. (2008). Randomized trial of a calling-infused career workshop incorporating counselor self-disclosure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, P. D., Jr. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20(2), 159–165.Google Scholar
  13. Fouad, N., Cotter, E. W., & Kantamneni, N. (2009). The effectiveness of a career decision-making course. Journal of Career Assessment, 17(3), 338–347. doi: 10.1177/1069072708330678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Gati, I., & Asher, I. (2001). Prescreening, in-depth exploration, and choice: From decision theory to career counseling practice. The Career Development Quarterly, 50(2), 140–157. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2001.tb00979.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gati, I., Krausz, M., & Osipow, S. H. (1996). A taxonomy of difficulties in career decision making. Journal of counseling psychology, 43(4), 510. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.4.510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gati, I., Ryzhik, T., & Vertsberger, D. (2013). Preparing young veterans for civilian life: The effects of a workshop on career decision-making difficulties and self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 373–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gati, I., & Saka, N. (2001). High school students’ career related decision making difficulties. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(3), 331–340. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01978.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Germeijs, V., & Verschueren, K. (2006). High school students’ career decision-making process: Development and validation of the study choice task inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(4), 449–471. doi: 10.1177/1069072706286510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gessnitzer, S., Schulte, E. M., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). VaMoS measuring the “within-person fit” of affective values, cognitive motives, and skills. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(4), 559–581. doi: 10.1177/1069072714553080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gouveia, V. V., Clemente, M., & Espinosa, P. (2003). The horizontal and vertical attributes of individualism and collectivism in a Spanish population. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanson, J. C. (2004). Assessment of interests. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 281–301). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Harris Bowlsbey, J. (2013). Computer assisted career guidance systems: A part of NCDA history. The Career Development Quarterly, 61(2), 181–185. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00047.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartung, P. J., Fouad, N. A., Leong, F. T., & Hardin, E. E. (2010). Individualism–collectivism links to occupational plans and work values. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(1), 34–45. doi: 10.1177/1069072709340526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hershenson, D. B. (1967). Sense of identity, occupational fit, and enculturation in adolescence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 14, 319–324. doi: 10.1037/h0024730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirschi, A., & Läge, D. (2007). The relation of secondary students’ career-choice readiness to a six-phase model of career decision making. Journal of Career Development, 34(2), 164–191. doi: 10.1177/0894845307307473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  28. Koys, D. J. (2016). Using the Department of Labor’s “My Next Move” to improve career preparedness. Journal of Management Education , 41(1), 94–117. doi: 10.1177/1052562916670195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lalwani, A. K., Shavitt, S., & Johnson, T. (2006). What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leong, F. T. (2010). A cultural formulation approach to career assessment and career counseling: Guest editor’s introduction. Journal of Career Development, 37(1), 375–390. doi: 10.1177/0894845310363708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leong, F. T., Austin, J. T., Sekaran, U., & Komarraju, M. (1998). An evaluation of the cross-cultural validity of Holland’s theory: Career choices by workers in India. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(3), 441–455. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leong, F. T., Hardin, E. E., & Gupta, A. (2010). A cultural formulation approach to career assessment and career counseling with Asian American clients. Journal of Career Development, 37(1), 465–486. doi: 10.1177/0894845310363808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leung, S. A. (2008). The big five career theories. In J. A. Athanasou & R. V. Esbroeck (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance (pp. 115–132). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maheswaran, D., & Shavitt, S. (2014). Issues and new directions in global consumer psychology. Journal of consumer psychology, 9(2), 59–66. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mau, W. C. (2001). Assessing career decision-making difficulties: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Career Assessment, 9(4), 353–364. doi: 10.1177/106907270100900403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mau, W. C. J. (2004). Cultural dimensions of career decision-making difficulties. Career Development Quarterly, 53, 67–77. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2004.tb00656.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCloy, R., Campbell, J., Oswald, F., Wall, J., Rivkin, D., & Lewis, P. (1999). Linking client assessment profiles to O*NET™ occupational profiles. Retrieved from https://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/LinkingProfiles.pdf.
  38. NCS. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.ncs.gov.in/.
  39. Nelson, M. R., & Shavitt, S. (2002). Horizontal and vertical individualism and achievement values a multimethod examination of Denmark and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 439–458. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033005001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O*NET Products at Work. (2017). National center for O* NET development. Retrieved from http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/paw/Products_at_Work.pdf.
  41. O*NET Reports and Documents. (2017). National center for O* NET development. Retrieved from https://www.onetcenter.org/research.html.
  42. Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). The measurement of values and individualism–collectivism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(11), 1177–1189. doi: 10.1177/01461672982411005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., Fleishman, E. A., Levin, K. Y., & Dye, D. M. (2001). Understanding work using the Occupational Information Network (O* NET): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 451–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00100.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peterson, G. W., Sampson, J. P., Jr., Lenz, J. G., & Reardon, R. C. (2002). A cognitive information processing approach to career problem solving and decision making. Career choice and development, 4, 312–369. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1999.tb00271.x.Google Scholar
  45. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reese, R. J., & Miller, C. D. (2006). Effects of a university career development course on career decision-making self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(2), 252–266. doi: 10.1177/1069072705274985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reese, R. J., & Miller, C. D. (2009). Using outcome to improve a career development course: Closing the scientist-practitioner gap. Journal of Career Assessment. doi: 10.1177/1069072709354309.Google Scholar
  48. Rounds, J., Mazzeo, S. E., Smith, T. J., Hubert, L., Lewis, P., & Rivkin, D. (1999). O*NET computerized interest profiler: Reliability, validity, and comparability. Retrieved from https://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/CIP_RVC.pdf.
  49. Rounds, J., Su, R., Lewis, P., & Rivkin, D. (2010). O*NET ® interest profiler short form psychometric characteristics: Summary. Retrieved from https://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/IPSF_Psychometric.pdf.
  50. Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(3), 310. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.3.310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rowell, P. C., Mobley, A. K., Kemer, G., & Giordano, A. (2014). Examination of a group counseling model of career decision making with college students. Journal of College Counseling, 17(2), 163–174. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1882.2014.00055.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J. P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., … Van Vianen, A. E. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of vocational behavior, 75(3), 239–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.004.
  53. Sawitri, D. R., & Creed, P. A. (2016). Collectivism and perceived congruence with parents as antecedents to career aspirations: A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Career Development. doi: 10.1177/0894845316668576.Google Scholar
  54. Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural research, 29(3), 240–275. doi: 10.1177/106939719502900302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sinha, J. B., Sinha, T. N., Verma, J., & Sinha, R. B. N. (2001). Collectivism coexisting with individualism: An Indian scenario. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4(2), 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sinha, J. B. P., & Verma, J. (1987). Structure of collectivism. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 123–129). Lisse: Swets & Zetlinger.Google Scholar
  57. Soh, S., & Leong, F. T. (2002). Validity of vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism in Singapore relationships with values and interests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swaney, K. B., Allen, J., Casillas, A., Hanson, M. A., & Robbins, S. B. (2012). Interests, work values, and occupations predicting work outcomes with the workkeys fit assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(4), 359–374. doi: 10.1177/1069072712448730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tien, H. L. S. (2005). The validation of the career decision-making difficulties scale in a Chinese culture. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 114–127. doi: 10.1177/1069072704270327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tracey, J. B., Sturman, M. C., & Tews, M. J. (2007). Ability versus personality: Factors that predict employee job performance. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 313–322. doi: 10.1177/0010880407302048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.96.3.506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism–collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907–924. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.696169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 279. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verma, J. (1999). Collectivism in the cultural perspective: The Indian scene. In J. C. Lasry, J. Adair, & K. Dion (Eds.), Latest contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 228–241). Lisse: Swets & Zetlinger.Google Scholar
  66. Willner, T., Gati, I., & Guan, Y. (2015). Career decision-making profiles and career decision-making difficulties: A cross-cultural comparison among US, Israeli, and Chinese samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xu, H., & Tracey, T. J. (2014). The role of ambiguity tolerance in career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Decision SciencesIndian Institute of Management, LucknowLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations