Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Educational inequality and social justice: Challenges for career guidance

  • Published:
International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article provides a multiperspective approach to educational careers. It first discusses social justice issues in the distribution of the crucial individual and social good of education. It then summarizes core findings of recent international research on processes and factors generating social disparities in the acquisition of education. Based on both it finally provides suggestions how especially professional guidance can contribute to reducing inequalities and increasing social justice.

Résumé

Inégalités scolaires et justice sociale: Enjeux pour le conseil d’orientation. Cet article propose une approche réunissant des perspectives multiples concernant les parcours de formation. En premier lieu, les enjeux de la justice sociale dans la répartition du bienfait individuel et social cruciaux de l’éducation sont examinés. Ensuite, les résultats principaux des récentes recherches internationales sur les processus et facteurs générant des disparités sociales dans l’acquisition des connaissances scolaires sont résumés. Enfin, sur la base de ces deux axes, cet article émet des suggestions sur la manière dont les professionnels en orientation, en particulier, peuvent contribuer à réduire les inégalités et augmenter la justice sociale.

Zusammenfassung

Bildungsungleichheit und soziale gerechtigkeit: Herausforderungen für die laufbahnberatung. Der Beitrag verfolgt einen Mehr-Perspektiven-Ansatz für die Analyse von Bildungskarrieren. Zunächst werden Aspekte sozialer Gerechtigkeit im Hinblick auf Bildung als ein bedeutsames individuelles und soziales Gut diskutiert. Anschließend werden wichtige Befunde aus internationalen Studien über Einflussfaktoren und Prozesse zusammengefasst, die soziale Disparitäten beim Bildungserfolg hervorbringen. Darauf basierend werden Vorschläge unterbreitet, wie professionelle Beratung dazu beitragen kann, Ungleichheiten zu reduzieren und soziale Gerechtigkeit zu befördern.

Resumen

Desigualdad educativa y justicia social: desafíos para la orientación profesional. El artículo proporciona un enfoque multiperspectivo sobre las profesiones educativas. Primero se analizan cuestiones de justicia social en la distribución del bien individual y social fundamental en la educación. A continuación, resume los hallazgos fundamentales de la reciente investigación internacional sobre los procesos y factores que generan las desigualdades sociales en la adquisición de la educación. Basado en ambos asuntos finalmente proporciona sugerencias de como especialmente los profesionales de la orientación pueden contribuir a reducir las desigualdades y aumentar la justicia social.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This distinction is not only useful for the explanation of inequalities conditioned by social background but also for the explanation of inequalities between sexes, ethnic groups, indigenous populations and various groups of migrants.

  2. Abitur = school leaving certificate in Germany allowing access to higher education.

  3. Recommendations made here in view of reducing secondary disparities in educational attainment are similar to those affirmed in Article 9 of the European Social Charter (1996 revision) in view of the right to vocational guidance. OECD (2004, p. 12) observes that "the foundations of career self-management skills (for example decision making, self-awareness, self-confidence) are laid at an early age”, and at the same time criticizes that career education and guidance in the primary school are limited or non-existent, is often not provided by career guidance specialists and that the disadvantaged groups tend to be the most reluctant to use these services.

  4. See e.g., a selection of various mentoring programs in Germany http://www.studienkompass.de/; http://chancenwerk.de/home/startseite; http://www.arbeiterkind.de/.

References

  • Arneson, R. (1989). Equality and equal opportunity of welfare. Philosophical Studies, 56, 77–93. doi:10.1007/BF00646210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R. (2003). Educational expansion and persistent inequality of education. European Sociological Review, 19, 1–24. doi:10.1093/esr/19.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R., & Müller, W. (2011). Bildungsungleichheiten nach Geschlecht und Herkunft im Wandel [Educational inequalities by gender and origin in transition]. In A. Hadjar (Ed.), Geschlechtsspezifische Bildungsungleichheiten [Gender-based educational inequalities] (pp. 55–75). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92779-4_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in western society. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9, 275–305. doi:10.1177/104346397009003002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2009). Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1475–1521. doi:10.1086/595951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2010). Long term-trends in educational inequality in Europe: Class inequalities and gender differences. European Sociological Review, 26, 31–48. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99, 906–944. doi:10.1086/293126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollmann, J. (2011). Verbindliche und unverbindliche Grundschulempfehlungen und soziale Ungleichheiten am ersten Bildungsübergang [Binding and non-binding primary school recommendations and social inequalities in the initial educational transition]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 63, 431–457. doi:10.1007/s11577-011-0148-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 283–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. (1996). Explaining change in educational inequality: Economic security and school reforms. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 95–112). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Introduction. Explaining class inequality in education: The Swedish test case. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 1–64). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Social Charter (ESC). (Revised 1996). Strasbourg, France: European Social Charter. Retrieved from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/163.htm.

  • Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 411–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichou, M., & Vallet, L.-A. (2013). The relative importance of academic achievement, tracking decisions, and their relative contribution to educational inequalities: Change over four decades in France. In M. Jackson (Ed.), Determined to succeed? Performance versus choice in educational attainment (pp. 116–148). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M., & Jonsson, J. O. (2013). Why does inequality of opportunity vary across countries? Primary and secondary effects in comparative context. In M. Jackson (Ed.), Determined to succeed? Performance versus choice in educational attainment (pp. 306–348). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mare, R. D. (1980). Social background and school continuation decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 295–305. doi:10.1080/01621459.1980.10477466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mare, R. D. (1981). Change and stability in educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 46, 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W., Pollak, R., Reimer, D., & Schindler, S. (2009). Hochschulbildung und soziale Ungleichheit [Higher education and social inequality]. In R. Becker (Ed.), Lehrbuch der Bildungssoziologie [Textbook of education sociology] (pp. 289–327). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92759-6_11.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). Career guidance: A handbook for policy makers. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/innovation-education/34060761.pdf.

  • OECD. (2012). Education at a glance. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/EAG%202012_e-book_EN_200912.pdf

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, S. (2014). Wege zur StudienberechtigungWege ins Studium? Eine Analyse sozialer Inklusions- und Ablenkungsprozesse [Ways to higher education admission: Pathways into higher education? An analysis of processes of social inclusion and diversion]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

  • Selz, M., & Vallet, L.-A. (2006). La démocratisation de l’enseignement et son paradoxe apparent [Democratization of enrollment and its apparent paradox]. Paris: INSEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973). On economic inequality. Oxford, NY: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/0198281935.001.0001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (Eds.). (1993). Persistent inequality. Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocké, V. (2007). Explaining educational decision and effects of families’ social class position: An empirical test of the Breen–Goldthorpe model of educational attainment. European Sociological Review, 23, 505–519. doi:10.1093/esr/jcm014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The article is a shortened version of “Educational Inequality and Social Justice: Challenges for Career Guidance” appearing under the same authorship as chapter 2.6 in G. Arulmani, A. J. Bakshi, F. T. L. Leong & A. G. Watts. (Eds.), Handbook of Career Development: International perspectives. New York, NY: Springer International. This extended version also includes additional references on which statements in this article are based. I thank Bernd-Joachim Ertelt and the reviewers of the article for helpful comments and Andrew Jenkins and Jean-Jacques Ruppert for the translation into English and language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, W. Educational inequality and social justice: Challenges for career guidance. Int J Educ Vocat Guidance 14, 21–33 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-014-9264-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-014-9264-4

Keywords

Navigation