Abstract
In this work, we obtain charged Taub-NUT-AdS black holes in f(R) gravity with the Maxwell term and deduce its thermodynamic first law. The holographic complexity of the black hole with inner and outer horizons is then studied using the “complexity equals action” (CA duality). We get a complexity growth rate considering all the contributions, including the bulk, boundary, and joint terms. At late times, the complexity growth rate can be expressed in a compact form which is significantly influenced by the Misner string and the correction from the f(R) gravity. Also, our result can reduce to that of the charged Taub-NUT-AdS black hole in Einstein-Maxwell gravity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ryu, S., Takayanagi, T.: Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0603001
Ryu, S., Takayanagi, T.: Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy. JHEP 08, 045 (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0605073
Hubeny, V.E., Rangamani, M., Takayanagi, T.: A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal. JHEP 07, 062 (2007). arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]
Casini, H., Huerta, M., Myers, R.C.: Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy. JHEP 05, 036 (2011). arXiv:1102.0440 [hep-th]
Nishioka, T., Ryu, S., Takayanagi, T.: Holographic Entanglement Entropy: An Overview. J. Phys. A 42, 504008 (2009). arXiv:0905.0932 [hep-th]
Jefferson, R., Myers, R.C.: Circuit complexity in quantum field theory. JHEP 10, 107 (2017). arXiv:1707.08570 [hep-th]
Jiang, J., Liu, X.: Circuit Complexity for Fermionic Thermofield Double states. Phys. Rev. D 99(2), 026011 (2019). arXiv:1812.00193 [hep-th]
Hackl, L., Myers, R.C.: Circuit complexity for free fermions. JHEP 07, 139 (2018). arXiv:1803.10638 [hep-th]
Khan, R., Krishnan, C., Sharma, S.: Circuit Complexity in Fermionic Field Theory. Phys. Rev. D 98(12), 126001 (2018). arXiv:1801.07620 [hep-th]
Guo, M., Hernandez, J., Myers, R.C., Ruan, S.-M.: Circuit Complexity for Coherent States. JHEP 10, 011 (2018). arXiv:1807.07677 [hep-th]
Guo, M., Fan, Z.-Y., Jiang, J., Liu, X., Chen, B.: Circuit complexity for generalized coherent states in thermal field dynamics. Phys. Rev. D 101 (12), 126007 (2020). arXiv:2004.00344 [hep-th]
Yang, R.-Q.: arXiv:1709.00921 [hep-th]. Phys. Rev. D 97(6), 066004 (2018)
Doroudiani, M., Naseh, A., Pirmoradian, R.: Complexity for Charged Thermofield Double States. JHEP 01, 120 (2020). arXiv:1910.08806 [hep-th]
Susskind, L.: Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons. Fortsch. Phys. 64, 24–43 (2016). arXiv:1403.5695 [hep-th]. [Addendum: Fortsch.Phys. 64, 44–48 (2016)]
Stanford, D., Susskind, L.: Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries. Phys. Rev. D 90(12), 126007 (2014). arXiv:1406.2678 [hep-th]
Brown, A.R., Roberts, D.A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B., Zhao, Y.: Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(19), 191301 (2016). arXiv:1509.07876 [hep-th]
Brown, A.R., Roberts, D.A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B., Zhao, Y.: Complexity, action, and black holes. Phys. Rev. D 93(8), 086006 (2016). arXiv:1512.04993 [hep-th]
Fan, Z.-Y., Liang, H.-Z.: Time dependence of complexity for Lovelock black holes. Phys. Rev. D 100(8), 086016 (2019). arXiv:1908.09310 [hep-th]
Fan, Z.-Y., Guo, M.: On the Noether charge and the gravity duals of quantum complexity. JHEP 08, 031 (2018). arXiv:1805.03796[hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 121 (2019)]
Sun, W., Ge, X.-H.: Notes on complexity growth rate, grand potential and partition function. Gen. Rel. Grav. 54(5), 46 (2022). arXiv:1912.00153 [hep-th]
Fan, Z.-Y., Guo, M.: Holographic complexity under a global quantum quench. Nucl. Phys. B 950, 114818 (2020). arXiv:1811.01473 [hep-th]
Mahapatra, S., Roy, P.: On the time dependence of holographic complexity in a dynamical Einstein-dilaton model. JHEP 11, 138 (2018). arXiv:1808.09917 [hep-th]
Babaei-Aghbolagh, H., Yekta, D.M., Velni Babaei, K., Mohammadzadeh, H.: Complexity growth in Gubser-Rocha models with momentum relaxation. Eur. Phys. J. C 82(4), 383 (2022). arXiv:2112.10725 [hep-th]
Carmi, D., Myers, R.C., Rath, P.: Comments on Holographic Complexity. JHEP 03, 118 (2017). arXiv:1612.00433 [hep-th]
Zhang, M., Fang, C., Jiang, J.: Holographic complexity of rotating black holes with conical deficits, arXiv:2212.05902 [hep-th]
Jiang, S., Jiang, J.: Holographic complexity in charged accelerating black holes. Phys. Lett. B 823, 136731 (2021). arXiv:2106.09371 [hep-th]
Jiang, J., Zhang, M.: Holographic complexity in charged supersymmetric black holes. Phys. Rev. D 102 (8), 084010 (2020). arXiv:2009.06830 [hep-th]
Jiang, J., Gao, S.: Universality of BSW mechanism for spinning particles. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(5), 378 (2019). arXiv:1905.02491 [hep-th]
Jiang, J.: Action growth rate for a higher curvature gravitational theory. Phys. Rev. D 98(8), 086018 (2018). arXiv:1810.00758 [hep-th]
Fan, Z.-Y., Guo, M.: Holographic complexity and thermodynamics of AdS black holes. Phys. Rev. D 100, 026016 (2019). arXiv:1903.04127 [hep-th]
Cai, R.-G., Ruan, S.-M., Wang, S.-J., Yang, R.-Q., Peng, R.-H.: Action growth for AdS black holes. JHEP 09, 161 (2016). arXiv:1606.08307 [gr-qc]
Fu, Z., Maloney, A., Marolf, D., Maxfield, H., Wang, Z.: Holographic complexity is nonlocal. JHEP 02, 072 (2018). arXiv:1801.01137 [hep-th]
Chen, S., Pei, Y.: Holographic Complexity in AdS Accelerating Black Holes. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 60(3), 917–923 (2021)
Couch, J., Fischler, W., Nguyen, P.H.: Noether charge, black hole volume, and complexity. JHEP 03, 119 (2017). arXiv:1610.02038 [hep-th]
Al Balushi, A., Hennigar, R.A., Kunduri, H.K., Mann, R.B.: Holographic Complexity and Thermodynamic Volume. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(10), 101601 (2021). arXiv:2008.09138 [hep-th]
Al Balushi, A., Hennigar, R.A., Kunduri, H.K., Mann, R.B.: Holographic complexity of rotating black holes. JHEP 05, 226 (2021). arXiv:2010.11203 [hep-th]
Bernamonti, A., Bigazzi, F., Billo, D., Faggi, L., Galli, F.: Holographic and QFT complexity with angular momentum. JHEP 11, 037 (2021). arXiv:2108.09281 [hep-th]
Andrews, S., Hennigar, R.A., Kunduri, H.K.: Chemistry and complexity for solitons in AdS5. Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (20), 204002 (2020). arXiv:1912.07637 [hep-th]
Belin, A., Myers, R.C., Ruan, S.-M., Sárosi, G., Speranza, A.J.: Does Complexity Equal Anything?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(8), 081602 (2022). arXiv:2111.02429 [hep-th]
Belin, A., Myers, R.C., Ruan, S.-M., Sárosi, G., Speranza, A.J.: Complexity Equals Anything II, arXiv:2210.09647 [hep-th]
Jiang, J., Deng, B., Li, X.-W.: Holographic complexity of charged Taub-NUT-AdS black holes. Phys. Rev. D 100(6), 066007 (2019). arXiv:1908.06565 [hep-th]
Sotiriou, T.P., Faraoni, V.: f(R) Theories of Gravity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451–497 (2010). arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]
Zhang, M., Mann, R.B.: Charged accelerating black hole in f(R) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 100(8), 084061 (2019). arXiv:1908.05118 [hep-th]
Papantonopoulos and Lefteris, [lecture notes in physics] the invisible universe: Dark matter and dark energy volume 720 —— models of dark energy
Bordo, A.B., Gray, F., Kubizňák, D.: Thermodynamics and Phase Transitions of NUTty Dyons. JHEP 07, 119 (2019). arXiv:1904.00030 [hep-th]
Ashtekar, A., Das, S.: Asymptotically Anti-de Sitter space-times: Conserved quantities. Class. Quant. Grav. 17, L17–L30 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/9911230
Lehner, L., Myers, R. C., Poisson, E., Sorkin, R. D.: Gravitational action with null boundaries. Phys. Rev. D 94(8), 084046 (2016). arXiv:1609.00207 [hep-th]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S., Pei, Y., Li, L. et al. Charged Taub-NUT-AdS Black Holes in f(R) Gravity and Holographic Complexity. Int J Theor Phys 62, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-023-05280-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-023-05280-5