The generalization of the double-slit experiment to an arbitrary number of slits is worthwhile to validate the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics and presents an increasing number of applications. In this work we present an explanation of this experiment from the vacuum fluctuations near the slits with two different approaches: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the Kubo-Martin-Schwinger relation characterizing thermalized states. Both descriptions reach analogous results when applied to the sea of virtual particles near the slits.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
De Raedt, H., Michielsen, K., Hess, K.: Phys. Rev. A 85 (2012)
Dvali, G.: Non–Thermal corrections to Hawking radiation versus the information paradox. Fortsch. Phys. 64, 106 (2016)
Duarte, F.J., Taylor, T.S., Clark, A.B., Davenport, W.E.: J. Opt 12, 015705 (2009)
Duarte, F.J.: Appl. Phys. Rev. 3, 041301 (2016)
Duarte, F.J.: Tunable Laser Optics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)
Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. III. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1965)
Giné, J.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950139 (2019)
Giné, J.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33(24), 1850140 (2018)
Kubo, R.: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957)
Magaña-Loaiza, O., De Leon, I., Mirhosseini, M., et al.: Nat. Commun. 7, 13987 (2016)
Martin, P.C., Schwinger, J.: Phys. Rev. 115, 1342 (1959)
Mcgervey, J.D.: Quantum Mechanics, Concepts and Applications. Academic Press, Cambridge (1995)
Melkikh, A.V.: Quantum information and microscopic measuring instruments. Comm. Theor. Phys. 72, 015101 (2019)
Petrov, O.: Optics and Photonics Journal 9, 9–14 (2019)
Sawant, R., Samuel, J., Sinha, A., Sinha, S., Sinha, U.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 12 (2014)
Sinha, U., Couteau, C., Jennewein, T., Laflamme, R., Weihs, G.: Science 329, 5990 (2010)
Sorkin, R.D.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9 (1994)
The authors are grateful to the referee for his/her valuable comments and suggestions to improve this paper. The work is partially supported by a MINECO/ FEDER grant number 2017-84383-P, AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya) grant number 2017SGR 1276 and ICREA Academia.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Here we derived the expressions for the interference pattern in a N-slit diffraction grating when impacted with an electron beam. We have developed a theoretical description from the free electron eigenfunctions and explained the interference pattern as the uncertainty related to the momentum distribution. Two scenarios were considered in this generalization: N infinitesimally thin slits and N slits width a finite width a. We have computed the probability coming from the momentum uncertainly, obtaining an interference equation in accordance with the results from the literature .
The studied configuration comprises N slits disposed on the x direction of the XY plane, with positions x1, x2, ..., xN. The screen where electrons interfere is located in a parallel plane at a certain distance in the z-axis. A schematic view of this assembly is presented in Fig. 1.
When the slits are impacted with an electron beam, each electron is placed in a superposition of being simultaneously at every slit. Let consider the position eigenstate |xn〉 of a particle going across the nth slit. Therefore, the normalized superposition state |Ψ〉 describing the phenomenon is expressed as
A.1 Infinitesimally Thin Slits
Assuming infinitesimally thin slits, the eigenfunction of the position can be studied as Dirac delta functions, i.e. 〈x|xn〉 = δ(x − xn). Therefore,
This spatial localization at N positions leads to a delocalization in the electrons momentum distribution px. This effect produces the interference pattern.
Now we consider the free-particle momentum eigenfunction,
The probability distribution for an electron with momentum px is
According to (14), the probability amplitude for finding the particle with momentum px is:
The associated probability function becomes
where Δxij = |xi − xj| (with i < j) in the summation term takes all the possible differences between slit positions. This result is consistent with Duarte’s development . Assuming equispaced slits, separated by a distance d, we can simplify the last expression to
A.2 Slits with Finite Width
Now we consider slits with finite width, a. The eigenfunction of the position is described by
Then the probability amplitude is
Finally, the associated probability function will be
Assuming equispaced slits, separated by a distance d, we can simplify the last expression to
This expression can be extended to show the interference pattern on the final screen. As an example, the probability for a 4-slit assembly is shown in Fig. 2. The number of slits changes the separation of the highest peaks: in a N-slit pattern, there are N − 2 lower peaks between the highest ones.
As a final remark, expression (22) should match (18) when the slit width becomes infinitesimally small, δa. In fact, we can check it taking into account the small-angle approximation for the \(\sin \limits (x)\) function. In that case,
About this article
Cite this article
Madrid, J., Giné, J. & Chemisana, D. Quantum Fluctuations and the N-Slit Interference. Int J Theor Phys 60, 1–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04607-w
- N-slit interference
- Vacuum fluctuations
- Uncertainty principle
- Quantum fields