The application of principles of Quantum Mechanics in areas outside of physics has been getting increasing attention in the scientific community in an emergent disciplined called Quantum Cognition. These principles have been applied to explain paradoxical situations that cannot be easily explained through classical theory. In quantum probability, events are characterised by a superposition state, which is represented by a state vector in a N-dimensional vector space. The probability of an event is given by the squared magnitude of the projection of this superposition state into the desired subspace. This geometric approach is very useful to explain paradoxical findings that involve order effects, but do we really need quantum principles for models that only involve projections? This work has two main goals. First, it is still not clear in the literature if a quantum projection model has any advantage towards a classical projection. We compared both models and concluded that the Quantum Projection model achieves the same results as its classical counterpart, because the quantum interference effects play no role in the computation of the probabilities. Second, it intends to propose an alternative relativistic interpretation for rotation parameters that are involved in both classical and quantum models. In the end, instead of interpreting these parameters as a similarity measure between questions, we propose that they emerge due to the lack of knowledge concerned with a personal basis state and also due to uncertainties towards the state of world and towards the context of the questions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Asano, M., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Yamato, I.: Quantum-like model of diauxie in escherichia coli: operational description of precultivation effect. J. Theor. Biol. 314, 130–137 (2012)
Asano, M., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M.: Quantum adaptative biology: From genetics to cognition. Springer (2015)
Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Yamato, I.: Quantum-like interference effect in gene expression: glucose-lactose destructive interference. Syst. Synth. Biol. 5, 59–68 (2011)
Birnbaum, M.: New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychol. Rev. 115, 463–501 (2008)
Bruza, P., Kitto, K., Nelson, D., McEvoy, C.: Is there something quantum-like about the human mental lexicon? J. Math. Psychol. 53, 362–377 (2009)
Bruza, P., Zuccon, G., Sitbon, L.: Modelling the information seeking user by the decisions they make Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference: Workshop on Modeling User Behavior for Information Retrieval Evaluation (MUBE 2013) (2013)
Busemeyer, J., Bruza, P.: Quantum model of cognition and decision. Cambridge University Press (2012)
Busemeyer, J., Wang, Z., Townsend, J.: Quantum dynamics of human decision making. J. Math. Psychol. 50, 220–241 (2006)
Busemeyer, J., Wang, Z., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Empirical comparison of markov and quantum models of decision making. J. Math. Psychol. 53, 423–433 (2009)
Busemeyer, J., Wang, Z., Shiffrin, R.: Bayesian model comparison favors quantum over standard decision theory account of dynamic inconsistencies. Decision 2, 1–12 (2015)
Crosson, R.: The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games. Organ. Hum. Decis. Process. 80, 118–133 (1999)
Haven, E., Khrennikov, A.: Quantum social science. Cambridge University Press (2013)
Khrennikov, A.: Classical and quantum-like randomness and the financial market Coping with the Complexity of Economics. Springer (2009)
Khrennikov, A., Haven, E.: Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: The use of probability interference and other concepts. J. Math. Psychol. 53, 378–388 (2009)
Kuhberger, A., Komunska, D., Josef, P.: The disjunction effect: Does it exist for two-step gambles? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 85, 250–264 (2001)
Lambdin, C., Burdsal, C.: The disjunction effect reexamined: Relevant methodological issues and the fallacy of unspecified percentage comparisons. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 103, 268–276 (2007)
Li, S., Taplin, J.: Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in prisoner’s dilemma game. Chin. J. Psychol. 44, 25–46 (2002)
Moore, D.: Measuring new types of question-order effects: Additive and subtractive. Public Opin. Q. 66, 80–91 (2002)
Moreira, C., Wichert, A.: Exploring the relations between quantum-like bayesian networks and decision-making tasks with regard to face stimuli. J. Math. Psychol. (2016)
Moreira, C., Wichert, A.: Quantum-like bayesian networks for modeling decision making. Front. Psychol. 7(11) (2016)
Moreira, C., Wichert, A.: Quantum probabilistic models revisited: the case of disjunction effects in cognition. Front. Phys.: Interdiscip. Phys. 4, 1–26 (2016)
Pothos, E., Busemeyer, J.: A quantum probability explanation for violations of rational decision theory. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 2171–2178 (2009)
Pothos, E., Busemeyer, J., Trueblood, J.: A quantum geometric model of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 120, 679–696 (2013)
Shafir, E., Tversky, A.: Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cogn. Psychol. 24, 449–474 (1992)
Trueblood, J., Busemeyer, J.: A quantum probability account of order of effects in inference. Cogn. Sci. 35, 1518–1552 (2011)
Trueblood, J., Pothos, E., Busemeyer, J.: Quantum probability theory as a common framework for reasoning and similarity. Front. Psychol. 5 (2014)
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974)
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol. Rev. 90, 293–315 (1983)
Tversky, A., Shafir, E.: The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. J. Psychol. Sci. 3, 305–309 (1992)
Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J.: A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an apriori and precise prediction. J. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5, 689–710 (2013)
Wang, Z., Solloway, T., Shiffrin, R., Busemeyer, J.: Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 9431–9436 (2014)
This work was supported by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) with reference UID/CEC/50021/2013 and through the PhD grant SFRH/BD/92391/2013. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Moreira, C., Wichert, A. Are Quantum Models for Order Effects Quantum?. Int J Theor Phys 56, 4029–4046 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-017-3424-5
- Order effects
- Quantum cognition
- Quantum projections
- Occam’s razor