Are Quantum Models for Order Effects Quantum?
The application of principles of Quantum Mechanics in areas outside of physics has been getting increasing attention in the scientific community in an emergent disciplined called Quantum Cognition. These principles have been applied to explain paradoxical situations that cannot be easily explained through classical theory. In quantum probability, events are characterised by a superposition state, which is represented by a state vector in a N-dimensional vector space. The probability of an event is given by the squared magnitude of the projection of this superposition state into the desired subspace. This geometric approach is very useful to explain paradoxical findings that involve order effects, but do we really need quantum principles for models that only involve projections? This work has two main goals. First, it is still not clear in the literature if a quantum projection model has any advantage towards a classical projection. We compared both models and concluded that the Quantum Projection model achieves the same results as its classical counterpart, because the quantum interference effects play no role in the computation of the probabilities. Second, it intends to propose an alternative relativistic interpretation for rotation parameters that are involved in both classical and quantum models. In the end, instead of interpreting these parameters as a similarity measure between questions, we propose that they emerge due to the lack of knowledge concerned with a personal basis state and also due to uncertainties towards the state of world and towards the context of the questions.
KeywordsOrder effects Quantum cognition Quantum projections Occam’s razor
- 2.Asano, M., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M.: Quantum adaptative biology: From genetics to cognition. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
- 6.Bruza, P., Zuccon, G., Sitbon, L.: Modelling the information seeking user by the decisions they make Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference: Workshop on Modeling User Behavior for Information Retrieval Evaluation (MUBE 2013) (2013)Google Scholar
- 7.Busemeyer, J., Bruza, P.: Quantum model of cognition and decision. Cambridge University Press (2012)Google Scholar
- 12.Haven, E., Khrennikov, A.: Quantum social science. Cambridge University Press (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Khrennikov, A.: Classical and quantum-like randomness and the financial market Coping with the Complexity of Economics. Springer (2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Li, S., Taplin, J.: Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in prisoner’s dilemma game. Chin. J. Psychol. 44, 25–46 (2002)Google Scholar
- 19.Moreira, C., Wichert, A.: Exploring the relations between quantum-like bayesian networks and decision-making tasks with regard to face stimuli. J. Math. Psychol. (2016)Google Scholar
- 20.Moreira, C., Wichert, A.: Quantum-like bayesian networks for modeling decision making. Front. Psychol. 7(11) (2016)Google Scholar
- 26.Trueblood, J., Pothos, E., Busemeyer, J.: Quantum probability theory as a common framework for reasoning and similarity. Front. Psychol. 5 (2014)Google Scholar
- 30.Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J.: A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an apriori and precise prediction. J. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5, 689–710 (2013)Google Scholar