Skip to main content

Can the Freedom-of-Choice Loophole be Closed Merely with Genuine Randomness?

Abstract

Freedom to choose the input parameters in Bell tests had not attracted much attention until T. Scheidl et al. pointed out the possible freedom-of-choice loophole that can make the Bell violation be interpreted by local realism (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 19708 (2010)). They claimed that this loophole could be closed by truely random setting choices, thus the deterministic local realism is excluded. In this paper, however, we raise the improved argument that random setting choices alone are not enough in closing the freedom-of-choice loophole. A deterministic local realism model based on this loophole will be proposed. In this model, we will prove that Bell violation with random setting choices is efficient in rejecting this local realism in ideal condition, but it can still exist when inefficient detectors (efficiency η ≤ 50 %) are used.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  1. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrödinger, E.: Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schrödinger, E.: Naturwissenschaften 23, 823 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schrödinger, E.: Naturwissenschaften 23, 844 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, J.S.: Phsycis 1, 195 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clauser, J., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freedman, S.J., Clauser, J.F.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., Roger, G.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rowe, M.A., et al.: Nature 409, 791–794 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tittel,W., Brendel, J., Zbinden, H., Gisin, N.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Clauser, J., Horne, M.A.: Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg, A., Mermin, N.D.: Phys. Rev. D 35, 3831 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson, J.Å.: Phys. Rev. A 57, 3304 (1998)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell, J.S.: J. Phys. C 2, 41 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Santos, E.: Phys. Lett. A 200, 1 (1995)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheidl, T., et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 19708 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell, J.S., Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A.: Dialectica 39, 85C110 (1985)

  21. Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsirelson, B.S.: Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Popescu, S., Rohrlich, D.: Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Jennewein, T., et al.: Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 1675 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pironio, S., et al.: Nature 464, 1021 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stefanov, A., et al.: J. Mod. Opt. 47, 595 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dynes, J.F., Yuan, Z.L., Sharpe, A.W., Shields, A.J.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 031109 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Atsushi, U., et al.: Nat. Photon 2, 728 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fiorentino, M., Santori, C., Spillane, S.M., Beausoleil, R.G., Munro, W.J.: Phys. Rev. A 75, 032334 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pironio, S., et al.: New J. Phys. 11, 045021 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lita, A.E., Miller, A.J., Nam, S.W.: Opt. Express 16, 3032 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Eberhard, P.H.: Phys. Rev. A 47, R747 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cabello, A., Larsson, J.A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220402 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Scarani, V., Simon, C.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220403 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Quintino, M.T., et al.: J. Phys. A 45, 215308 (2012)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Araújo, M., et al.: Phys. Rev. A 86, 030101(R) (2012)

  37. Brunner, N., Gisin, N.: Phys. Lett. A 372, 3162 (2008)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Giustina, M., et al.: Nature 497, 227 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Selleri, F., Zeilinger, A.: Found. Phys. 18, 1141 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gisin, N., Gisin, B.: Phys. Lett. A 260, 323 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank A. Zeilinger for his instructive comments and suggestions. Financial support from NSFC Grant Nos. 10905028, U1204616, 11204072, 61378011. Program for ScienceTechnology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (Grant No. 2012HASTIT028), Program for Science and Technology Innovation Research Team in University of Henan Province (Grant No. 13IRTSTHN020) and Science Foundation of Henan Provincial Education Department (Grant No. 2010A140010) is gratefully acknowledged. H. Lu is also supported by Hubei Provincial Department of Education under Grant No. 20121406.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao-Hua Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, Yg., Liu, Q., Hu, YH. et al. Can the Freedom-of-Choice Loophole be Closed Merely with Genuine Randomness?. Int J Theor Phys 53, 2434–2440 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2040-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2040-x

Keywords

  • Bell violation
  • Freedom-of-choice loophole
  • Random setting choices
  • Deterministic local realism model