Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of the LVDP and ΛCDM Cosmological Models

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compare the cosmological kinematics obtained via our law of linearly varying deceleration parameter (LVDP) with the kinematics obtained in the ΛCDM model. We show that the LVDP model is almost indistinguishable from the ΛCDM model up to the near future of our universe as far as the current observations are concerned, though their predictions differ tremendously into the far future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. Because our main goal in this letter is to compare the LVDP and ΛCDM models, for convenience, we regard the time parameter as dimensionless by taking \(t\rightarrow \frac{t}{1~\mathrm{Gyr}}\) and indicate Gyr in parentheses, i.e., (Gyr), to remind the reader of this.

References

  1. Akarsu, O., Dereli, T.: Cosmological models with linearly varying deceleration parameter. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 621 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berman, M.S.: A special law of variation for Hubble’s parameter. Nuovo Cimento B 74, 182–186 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunha, J.V.: Kinematic constraints to the transition redshift from SNe Ia union data. Phys. Rev. D 79, 047301 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai, Y.F., Saridakis, E.N., Setare, M.R., Xia, J.Q.: Quintom cosmology: theoretical implications and observations. Phys. Rep. 493, 1–60 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sahni, V., Saini, T.D., Starobinsky, A.A., Alam, U.: Statefinder—a new geometrical diagnostic of dark energy. JETP Lett. 77, 201–206 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Visser, M.: Jerk, snap and the cosmological equation of state. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, 2603–2615 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunajski, M., Gibbons, G.: Cosmic jerk, snap and beyond. Class. Quantum Gravity 25, 235012 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahni, V., Saini, T.D., Starobinsky, A.A.: The case for a positive cosmological Λ-term. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 9, 373–443 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grøn, Ø., Hervik, S.: Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity: With Modern Applications in Cosmology. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Komatsu, E., et al.: Seven-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 18 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Z., Wu, P., Yu, H.: Examining the cosmic acceleration with the latest Union2 supernova data. Phys. Lett. B 695, 1–8 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yun, C., Bharat, R.: Hubble parameter data constraints on dark energy. Phys. Lett. B 703, 406–411 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors appreciate the financial support received from the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgür Akarsu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akarsu, Ö., Dereli, T. A Comparison of the LVDP and ΛCDM Cosmological Models. Int J Theor Phys 51, 2995–3000 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-012-1200-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-012-1200-0

Keywords

Navigation