Skip to main content
Log in

Stern-Gerlach Experiment’s Interpretations and Noether’s Theorem

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we suggest that theories treating two interacting objects in a different manner (for instance electromagnetic field of a laser classically, and the interacting atom as a quantum object) should be called “mixed”. Mixed theories are not so rare in Physics. One just should look at the whole area of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics in which mixed theories are often used, and, also, theories including quantum object interacting with classical surroundings that are the subject of our present discussion: the field of Quantum decoherence, when applied to resolving the dilemma should classical trajectories be used in explaining the Stern-Gerlach experiment or not. Consequently we are proving one improved corollary to Noether’s theorem, stating that mixed theories are not supporting the law of conservation of angular momentum and spin, as they are not based on the isotropy of space-time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Messiah, A.: Quantum Mechanics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., Laloe, F.: Quantum Mechanics. Wiley, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, Y., Bruder, C., Sun, C.P.: Generalized Stern-Gerlach effect for chiral molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 130403 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arsenijević, M., Dugić, M.: Nonexistence of the classical trajectories in the Stern-Gerlach experiment. Acta Phys. Pol. A 117, 760–763 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ristić, V.M., Radulović, M.M.: Corollary to Noether’s theorem about the conservation of angular momentum and spin in theories that are dealing with strong laser fields. Laser Phys. Lett. 1(2), 79–81 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jammer, M.: The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zurek, W.H., Habib, S., Paz, J.P.: Coherent states via decoherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1187–1190 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ristić, V.M.: Noether’s theorem—a physicists view at and new gnosiological aspects of the famous theorem. Publications of Fac. Sci., Kragujevac, ISBN 978-86-81829-93-6 (2008). http://physics.kg.ac.rs/fizika/prilozi/cv/RisticDrVladimir/test1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bogoliubov, N.N., Shirkov, D.V.: Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields. Interscience, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richtmyer, R.: Principles of Advanced Mathematical Physics. Springer, New York (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Radulović.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ristić, V.M., Radulović, M.M. & Miladinović, T.B. Stern-Gerlach Experiment’s Interpretations and Noether’s Theorem. Int J Theor Phys 50, 3602–3609 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0867-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0867-y

Keywords

Navigation