Abstract
Observers restricted to the observation of pointer states of apparatus cannot conclusively demonstrate that the pointer of an apparatus \(\mathcal{A}\) registers the state of a system of interest S without perturbing S. Observers cannot, therefore, conclusively demonstrate that the states of a system S are redundantly encoded by pointer states of multiple independent apparatus without destroying the redundancy of encoding. The redundancy of encoding required by quantum Darwinism must, therefore, be assumed from outside the quantum-mechanical formalism and without the possibility of experimental demonstration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zurek, W.H.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003). arXiv:quant-ph/0105127v3
Zurek, W.H.: Nat. Phys. 5, 181 (2009). arXiv:0903.5082v1 [quant-ph]
Zwolak, M., Quan, H.T., Zurek, W.H.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 110402 (2009). arXiv:0904.0418v2 [quant-ph]
Zwolak, M., Quan, H.T., Zurek, W.H.: (2009). arXiv:0911.4307v1 [quant-ph]
Forrest, P.: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/identity-indiscernible/
Tegmark, M.: Phys. Rev. E 61, 4194 (2000). arXiv:quant-ph/9907009v2
Hicks, K.: Proc. IX Int. Conf. Hypernuclear Strange Part Phys. Springer, Berlin (2006), p. 365. arXiv:hep-ph/0703004v3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fields, C. Quantum Darwinism Requires an Extra-Theoretical Assumption of Encoding Redundancy. Int J Theor Phys 49, 2523–2527 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-010-0443-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-010-0443-x