Skip to main content
Log in

The Quantum Speed up as Advanced Cognition of the Solution

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solving a problem requires a problem solving step (deriving, from the formulation of the problem, the solution algorithm) and a computation step (running the algorithm). The latter step is generally oblivious of the former. We unify the two steps into a single physical interaction: a many body interaction in an idealized classical framework, a measurement interaction in the quantum framework. The many body interaction is a useful conceptual reference. The coordinates of the moving parts of a perfect machine are submitted to a relation representing problem-solution interdependence. Moving an “input” part nondeterministically produces a solution through a many body interaction. The kinematics and the statistics of this problem solving mechanism apply to quantum computation—once the physical representation is extended to the oracle that produces the problem. Configuration space is replaced by phase space. The relation between the coordinates of the machine parts now applies to a set of variables representing the populations of the qubits of a quantum register during reduction. The many body interaction is replaced by the measurement interaction, which changes the population variables from the values before to the values after measurement (and the forward evolution into the backward evolution, the same unitary transformation but ending with the state after measurement). Quantum computation is reduction on the solution of the problem under the problem-solution interdependence relation.

The speed up is explained by a simple consideration of time-symmetry, it is the gain of information about the solution due to backdating, to before running the algorithm, a time-symmetric part of the reduction on the solution. This advanced cognition of the solution reduces the solution space to be explored by the algorithm. The quantum algorithm takes the time taken by a classical algorithm that knows in advance 50% of the information acquired by reading the solution (i.e. by measuring the content of the computer register at the end of the quantum algorithm).

From another standpoint, the notion that a computation process is condensed into a single physical interaction explains the fact that we perceive many things at the same time in the introspective “present” (the instant of the interaction in the classical case, the time interval spanned by backdated reduction in the quantum case).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbagnano, N.: Storia della Filosofia, vol. I, p. 87. U.T.E.T., Turin (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castagnoli, G.: Quantum computation based on retarded and advanced propagation. quant-ph/9706019 (1997)

  3. Castagnoli, G.: Quantum problem solving as simultaneous computation. arXiv:0710.1744 (2007)

  4. Castagnoli, G.: On a fundamental problem solving mechanism explaining the wholeness of perception. In: Hameroff, S.R., Kaszniak, A.W., Scott, A.C. (eds.) Toward a Science of Consciousness 2008—Tucson Discussions and Debates, p. 456. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castagnoli, G.: The mechanism of quantum computation. Int. J. Theor. Phys. (2008). Special issue “Quantum Computation 2008”. UV

  6. Castagnoli, G., Finkelstein, D.: Theory of the quantum speed up. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457, 1799 (2001). quant-ph/0010081

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Castagnoli, G., Monti, D., Sergienko, A.: Performing quantum measurement in suitably entangled states originates the quantum computation speed up. quant-ph/9908015 (1999)

  8. Cleve, R., Ekert, A., Macchiavello, C., Mosca, M.: Quantum algorithms revisited. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454(1969), 339–354 (1996). quant-ph/9708016

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deutsch, D.: Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97 (1985)

    MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Finkelstein, D.R.: Space-time structure in high energy interactions. In: Gudehus, T., Kaiser, G., Perlmutter, A. (eds.) Coral Gables Conference on Fundamental Interactions at High Energy. Center of Theoretical Studies, January 22–24, 1969. University of Miami, pp. 324–343. Gordon & Breach, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Finkelstein, D.R.: Generational Quantum Theory. Preprint (2008)

  12. Fredkin, E., Toffoli, T.: Conservative logic. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 219 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Grover, L.K.: A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In: Proc. 28th Ann. ACM Symp. Theory of Computing (1996)

  14. Grover, L.K.: From Schrodinger equation to quantum search algorithm. quant-ph/0109116 (2001)

  15. Hameroff, S.R., Penrose, R.: Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: a model for consciousness? In: Hameroff, S.R., Kaszniak, A.W., Scott, A.C. (eds.) Toward a Science of Consciousness—the First Tucson Discussions and Debates, pp. 507–540. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaye, P., Laflamme, R., Mosca, M.: An Introduction to Quantum Computing. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Mosca, M., Ekert, A.: The Hidden Subgroup Problem and Eigenvalue Estimation on a Quantum Computer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1509. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mulligan, K., Smith, B.: Mach and Ehrenfels: The foundations of gestalt theory. In: Smith, B. (ed.) Foundations of Gestalt Theory, Munich and Vienna. Philosophia, vol. 124 (1988). http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/mach/mach.html-N_1_

  19. Penrose, R.: Shadows of the Mind—a Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sheehan, D.: Consciousness and the physics of time. In: Consciousness Research Abstracts, Proceedings of the Toward a Science of Consciousness Meeting, April 8–12, 2008, Tucson, Arizona

  21. Simon, D.: On the power of quantum computation. In: Proc. 35th Ann. Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Sci., pp. 116–123 (1994)

  22. Stapp, H.P.: Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Castagnoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castagnoli, G. The Quantum Speed up as Advanced Cognition of the Solution. Int J Theor Phys 48, 857–873 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9859-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9859-y

Keywords

Navigation