Skip to main content
Log in

Partial Description of Quantum States

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most central and controversial element of quantum mechanics is the use of non zero vectors of a Hilbert space (or, more generally, of one dimension subspaces) for representing the state of a quantum system. In particular, the question whether such a representation is complete has been debated since almost the early days of quantum mechanics.

In this article, we develop an alternate way to formalize knowledge about the state of quantum systems, based solely on experimentally accessible elements, namely on outcomes of finite measurements. We introduce what we call partial description which, given a feasible measurement, indicates some outcomes which are known to be impossible (i.e. known to have a probability equal to 0 to occur) and hence have to be discarded. Then, we introduce partial states (which are partial descriptions providing as much information as possible) and compare this way to describe quantum states to the orthodox one, using vector rays.

Finally, we show that partial states allow to describe quantum states in a strictly more expressive way that the orthodox description does.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birkhoff, G.: Lattice Theory, 3rd ed. Colloquim Publications, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunet, O.: A priori knowledge and the Kochen-Specker theorem. Phys. Lett. A 365(1–2), 39–43 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalla Chiara, M.L., Giuntini, R.: Quantum logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. III. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge Mathematical Textbooks (1990)

  7. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gleason, A.: Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. J. Math. Mech. 6, 885–893 (1957)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gratzer, G.: General Lattice Theory. Academic, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes, R.I.G.: The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kochen, S., Specker, E.P.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Pták, P., Pulmannová, S.: Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Smets, S.: On causation and a counterfactual in quantum logic: the Sasaki hook. Log. Anal. 173–175 (2001)

  14. Stubbe, I., van Steirteghem, B.: Propositional systems, Hilbert lattices and generalized Hilbert spaces. In: Engesser, K., Gabbay, D.M., Lehmann, D. (eds.) Handbook of Quantum Logic and Quantum Structures: Quantum Structures, pp. 477–524. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Brunet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunet, O. Partial Description of Quantum States. Int J Theor Phys 48, 729–742 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9849-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9849-0

Keywords

Navigation