Abstract
In the absence of an external frame of reference—i.e., in background independent theories such as general relativity—physical degrees of freedom must describe relations between systems. Using a simple model, we investigate how such a relational quantum theory naturally arises by promoting reference systems to the status of dynamical entities. Our goal is twofold. First, we demonstrate using elementary quantum theory how any quantum mechanical experiment admits a purely relational description at a fundamental. Second, we describe how the original “non-relational” theory approximately emerges from the fully relational theory when reference systems become semi-classical. Our technique is motivated by a Bayesian approach to quantum mechanics, and relies on the noiseless subsystem method of quantum information science used to protect quantum states against undesired noise. The relational theory naturally predicts a fundamental decoherence mechanism, so an arrow of time emerges from a time-symmetric theory. Moreover, our model circumvents the problem of the “collapse of the wave packet” as the probability interpretation is only ever applied to diagonal density operators. Finally, the physical states of the relational theory can be described in terms of “spin networks” introduced by Penrose as a combinatorial description of geometry, and widely studied in the loop formulation of quantum gravity. Thus, our simple bottom-up approach (starting from the semiclassical limit to derive the fully relational quantum theory) may offer interesting insights on the low energy limit of quantum gravity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aharonov, Y. and Kaufherr, T. (1984). Quantum frames of reference. Physical Review D 30, 368.
Aharonov, Y. and Susskind, L. (1967). Charge superselecion rule. Physical Review 155(5), 1428.
Baez, J. (1995). Baiz, J. (1995). Spin networks in nonperturbative quantum gravity. In L. H. Kauffman, (ed.) The Interface of Knots and Physics, American Mathematical Society, Hattiesburg Mississippi. p. 167.
Baez, J. C. (1996). Spin network states in gauge theory. Advances in Mathematics 117, 253.
Baez, J. C. (2000). An introduction to spin foam models of quantum gravity and BF theory. Lecture Notes in Physics 543, 25.
Bartlett, S. D., Rudolph, T., and Spekkens, R. W. (2004). Decoherence-full subspaces and the cryptographic power of a private shared reference frame. Physical Review A 70, 32307.
Bartlett, S. D., Rudolph, T., and Spekkens, R. W. (2005). Dialogue concerning two views on quantum coherences: factist and fictionist. quant-ph/0507214.
Busch, P. and Singh, J. (1998). Luders theorem for unsharp quantum effects. Physics Letters A 249, 10–24.
Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A., and Schack, R. (2002). Quantum probabilities as bayesian probabilities. Physsical Review A 65, 022305.
DeWitt, B. S. (1967). Quantum theory of gravity I: the canonical theory. Physical Review 160, 1113.
Freidel, L. and Livine, E. R. (2003). Spin networks for noncompact groups. Journal of Mathematical Physics 44, 1322.
Fuchs, C. A. (2002). Quantum foundations in the light of quantum information. In A. Gonis, (ed.) 2001 NATO Advanced Research Workshop “Decoherence and its implications in quantum computation and information transfer,” Mikonos, Greece.
Girelli, F. and Livine, E. R. (2005). Reconstructing quantum geometry from quantum information: spin networks as harmonic oscillators. Classical and Quantum Gravity 22, 3295.
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., and Maccone, L. (2004). Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306, 1330.
Gambini, R. and Porto, R. A. (2001). Relational time in generally covariant quantum systems: four models. Physical Review D 63, 105014.
Gambini, R., Porto, R., and Pullin, J. (2004). A relational solution to the problem of time in quantum mechanics and quantum gravity induces a fundamental mechanism for decoherence. New Journal of Physies 6, 45.
Gambini, R., Porto, R., and Pullin, J. (2005). Fundamental decoherence in quantum gravity. Brazilian Journal of Physics 35, 266.
Goldstone, J., Salam, A., and Weinberg, S. (1962). Broken symmetries. Physical Review 127, 965.
Haag, R. (1992). Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras. Springer.
Hartle, J. B., Laflamme, R., and Marolf, D. (1995). Conservation laws in the quantum mechanics of closed systems. Physical Review D 51, 7007.
Kempe, J., Bacon, D., Lidar, D. A., and Whaley, K. B. (2001). Theory of decoherence-free fault-tolerant universal quantum compuation. Physical Review A 63, 42307.
Kershaw, D., and Woo, C. H. (1974). Experimental test for the charge superselection rule. Physical Review Letters 33(15).
Kribs, D., Laflamme, R., and Poulin, D. (2005). A unified and generalized approach to quantum error correction. Physical Review Letters 94, 180501.
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., and Viola, L. (2002). Theory of quantum error correction for general noise. Physical Review Letters 84, 2525–2528.
Kraus, K. (1983). States, Effects and Operations. Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory, Academic Press, Berlin.
Kogut, J. B., and Susskind, L. (1975). Kogut, J. B. and Susskind, L. (1975). Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories. Physical Review D 11, 395.
Leggett, A. J. (2000). Topics in the theory of the ultracold dilute alkali gases. In C. M. Savage and M. -P. Das, (eds.), Bose-Einstein Condensation. p.1.
Lindblad, G. (1999). A general no-cloning theorem. Letter in Mathematical Physics 47, 189–196.
Lloyd, S. (2005). The computational universe: quantum gravity from quantum computation.
Major, S. (1999). A spin network primer. American Journal of Physics 67, 972.
Marolf, D. (2000). Group averaging and refined algebraic quantization: Where are we now?
Mazzucchi, S. (2000). On the observables describing a quantum reference frame. arxiv.org:quant-ph/0006060
Milburn, G. J. (2003). Lorentz invariant intrinsic decoherence.
Milburn, G. J. and Poulin, D. (2005). Relational time for systems of oscillators. International Journal of Quantum Info.
Mølmer, K. (1997). Optical coherence: a convenient fiction. Physical Review A 55, 3195.
Nielsen, M. A., and Poulin, D. (2005). Algebraic and information-theoretic conditions for operator quantum error-correction.
Ollivier, H., Poulin, D., and Zurek, W. H. (2004). Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness. Physical Review Letters 93, 220401.
Pegg, D. T. (1991). Time in a quantum mechanical world. Journal of Physics 24, 3031.
Penrose, R. (1971). Angular momentum: an approach to combinatorial space-time. In T. Bastin, editor. Quantum Theory and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p. 151.
Poulin, D. (2004). Emergence of a classical world from within quantum theory. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Providence, RI (Rhode Island), USA.
Page, D. N. and Wootters, W. K. (1983). Evolution without evolution: dynamics described by stationary observables. Physical Review D 27, 2885.
Rovelli, C. (1991). Quantum reference systems. Classical and Quantum Gravity 8, 317.
Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35, 1637.
Rovelli, C. (2004). Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Rovelli, C. and Smolin, L. (1995). Spin networks and quantum gravity. Physical Review D 52, 5743.
Sakurai, J. (1994). Modern quantum mechanics, Addison-Welay,Ontario, Canada.
Toller, M. (1997). Quantum reference frames and quantum transformations. Il Nuovo Cimento 112, 1013.
Unruh, W. G. and Wald, R. M. (1989). Time and the interpretation of canon ical quantum gravity. Physical Review D 40, 2598.
von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Wheeler, J. A. (1991). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. H. Zurek, (ed.) Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, Addison-Wesley, Ontario, Canada.
Wigner, E. P. (1957). Relativistic invariance and quantum phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 255.
Zanardi, P. (2001). Stabilizing quantum information. Physical Review A 63, 12301.
Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 715–775.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
PACS numbers: 03.67.-a, 04.60.Pp, 03.65.Yz
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poulin, D. Toy Model for a Relational Formulation of Quantum Theory. Int J Theor Phys 45, 1189–1215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9052-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9052-0