Abstract
This article investigates the June 2013 protests in Brazil from the perspective an analysis of the pattern of capitalist accumulation and the reaction of state apparatuses. The premise is that these protests are derived from a social malaise in neoliberalism, produced over decades of implementation of commodification and financialization programs. This malaise was expressed through fragmented claims. When, however, the dynamics of protests are observed in the light of the actions of the ideological and repressive state apparatuses, a polarization is observed between participating actors and movements regarding the subject of whether or not to criticize neoliberalism. Finally, it is argued that these apparatuses have fixed divergences to promote conservative demonstrators and to shield the pattern of neoliberal accumulation against dissention. This shielding was stabilized by a selective policy of criminalizing the protest’s sectors. The article’s arguments are based on the renewal of Louis Althusser’s state theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
The conception of malaise in neoliberalism is not the same as presented in the relevant literature on “squeezed middle class in Brazil” (Morgan, 2018, p. 55). Existing data shows losses (or at least much more modest gains) for the established middle class in the period 2003–2013, if compared with significant material gains for the rich and the poor. This kind of analysis does not set out to discuss either question on privatization or the different forms of indebtedness. With the notion of malaise in neoliberalism, the debate on delusion of the middle classes and working classes is less related to economic gains and more to the capacity of government to produce social adherence to egalitarian universal policies that ensure the conditions of reproduction of common, collective, and public goods.
Freud’s concept of malaise in culture (Das Unbehagen in der Kultur) appears in the present analysis as a mere inspiration. Indeed, relevant to my argument is the contradiction that Freud points out between civilisational order and real aspirations of the individuals. For him, civilisation is defined as violence against desires, repressing them; it thus becomes a burden, a factor of suffering for individuals. See Freud 2018 [1930].
See Gonçalves 2021
A relevant literature has analyzed that the conflicts, which culminated in the protests of 2013 and extended into the Bolsonaro government, have an intersectional character combining class, gender, and racial dimensions. See, for instance, Pinheiro-Machado and Scalco (2018). A discussion on these entanglements goes beyond the scope of the article. Furthermore, claims of recognition presuppose expectations about access to goods, services, and infrastructures, which are provided by the market expansion or decommodification policies. The debate on the malaise in neoliberalism uses this level of abstraction as the point of departure.
It is important to highlight that levels of crime and insecurity are not mentioned as a dimension of the malaise in neoliberalism, because they are related to structural problems of Brazilian capitalism. Moreover, at the time of the 2013 protests, there was a certain confidence by the population in the control of organized crime due to pacification policies in favelas. See, for instance, Ribeiro and Vilarouca 2020.
By assigning the character of free-riders or vulture groups to right-wing and far-right movements, I am not attributing any precedence to left-wing organizations for framing or expressing dissatisfactions articulated in the demonstrations of June 2013. The terms are used in a very concrete way within the dynamics of the protests: a left-wing movement, the MPL, initiated the June 2013. Right-wing movements took advantage of the existing protests and integrated themselves into them. This successful action shows that the right-wing movements did not arise only during 2013 but have been organized before then. As put forth by Rocha (2019), right-wing movements have developed a robust political engagement at the local level and in social networks at least since 2010.
This occurred on June 20, 2013. See “Editorial” (2013e).
For an analysis of the expression of these conservative articulations, see Russo (2015).
“Folha de São Paulo” and “O Globo” are the leading newspapers in Brazil by circulation.
See “Editorial” (2013d).
See “Jamais Achei Que Ele Fosse Atirar” (2013).
Mensalão was a vote-buying scandal that broke out in 2005 during Lula da Silva administration. It was based on accusations that government officials paid congressmen monthly stipends in exchange for votes.
See Rousseff (2013).
Cabral is the surname of the former Governor Sérgio Cabral Filho of the State of Rio de Janeiro (2007–2014). In June 2013, demonstrators occupied the street where he lives to protest against his authoritarian way of administering, as well as against suspicions of corruption. He had already been convicted nine times and condemned for nearly 200 years of prison.
About the events and the numbers of people detained and arrested, see the chronology in Teixeira (2014, pp. 203–267).
To draw conclusions about the shared politics of the editorials of O Globo and Folha de São Paulo, Goes and Moszczynska (2015, pp. 114–115) cross-referenced keywords and analyzed the frequency with which they appeared. Based on this quantitative research, the authors surveyed the most frequently repeated expressions and terms. They found that the opinions of the respective newspapers combined arguments that disqualified left-wing Brazilian social movements and unions, portrayed as backward and violent, thus treating them as a matter of public safety.
As presented in the previous footnote, Goes and Moszczynska’s quantitative analysis suggests a convergence between the orientation of Folha de São Paulo and O Globo against leftist movements during the 2013 processes. Obviously, the role of these newspapers in Brazil’s domination structure reinforces the authors’ thesis. This does not mean accepting that there is coordination between the practices of the two companies and that, although they participate in the system of financialized accumulation, both cannot diverge from specific orientation. However, it is not the object of this paper to discuss disputes over positions of power. My aim is different: to observe how state apparatuses create and overcome their tensions to ensure the general reproduction of inequalities and domination, specifically neoliberal domination.
Possession of an explosive device was the justification for the police violence against demonstrators who carried vinegar (which was used to counter the effects of tear gas) and against Rafael Braga Vieira, a homeless person who was found near the protests with a popular brand of disinfectant cleaner “pinho sol” and bleach. Cf. Artigo 19 (2014).
All of the accusations that generated the detentions and prisons were systematized by the report “Protestos no Brasil 2013” (Artigo 19, 2014).
Cf. “Editorial” (2013e).
See Mendes et al. (2013).
Cf. “Editorial” (2013b).
Cf. “Hostilizados, Petistas Abandonam Ato” (2013).
Cf. Lei n. 12.850, 2013.
Cf. Souza (2013).
For an analysis of this law, see Machado and Gonçalves (2015).
See Brasil (2015).
Nossa (2016).
References
Almeida, C., Batista, H. G., & Fariello, D. (2014). Emperrado: Incentivos e subsídios a carros somam quase o dobro do valor investido em transporte coletivo em 2013. Jornal O Globo, (29.672), p. 35.
Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism. Verso.
Anderson, P. (2000). History and lessons of neoliberalism. In F. Houtart & F. Polet (Ed.), The Other Davos : Globalisation of Resistances and Struggles. https://bityli.com/xfCjBT. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Anderson, P. (2018). An afternoon with Althusser: Summer 1977. New Left Review, 113, 59–66. https://bityli.com/dktJzf. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Artigo 19. (2014). Protestos no Brasil 2013. https://bit.ly/3xaOAOb. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Augusto, A., & Rodrigues, T. (2016). Liberdade e securitizações: Manifestações de rua, medidas de segurança e expansão dos monitoramentos. In A. Freixo (Ed.), Manifestações no Brasil: As ruas em disputa (pp. 57–84). Oficina Raquel.
Barker, C., Cox, L., Krinsky, J., & Nilsen, A. G. (2013). Marxism and social movements. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251434
Brasil. (2015). Exposição de Motivos Interministerial nº 00125/2015. Brasília: Ministério da Fazenda e Ministério de Justiça. https://bit.ly/2SEvjpz. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
Bringel, B. (2013). Miopias, sentidos e tendências do levante brasileiro de 2013. Insight Inteligência, 62, 42–53. https://bityli.com/zSPUIo. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Bringel, B. (2016). The long June: The 2013 mobilizations and the future of social movements in Brazil. In F. Simin (Ed.), Understanding Southern Social Movements (pp. 153–167). Routledge.
Bruno, M., Diawara, H., Araújo, E., Reis, A. C., & Rubens, M. (2011). Finance-led growth regime no Brasil: Estatuto teórico, evidências empíricas e consequências macroeconômicas. Revista De Economia Política, 31(5), 730–750. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572011000500003
Caulyt, F. (2013). Leis usadas durante protestos em Rio e São Paulo sob críticas. Deutsche Welle. https://p.dw.com/p/19zOk. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Cavalcante, S. (2010). Sobre as relações de classe na privatização das telecomunicações no Brasil [Paper presentation]. IV Simpósio Lutas Sociais na América Latina, Paraná, Brasil. https://bityli.com/jEiPk. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Duménil, G., & Levy, D. (2013). Neoliberalism and its crisis. In K. Yagi, N. Yokokawa, H. Shinjiro, & G. Dymski (Eds.), Crises of global economy and the future of capitalism: An insight into Marx’s crisis theory (pp. 191–207). Routledge.
Editorial: Decifrar as mensagens da rua. (2013a). O Globo. (29.171), 22.
Editorial: O direito à liberdade de expressão. (2013b). O Globo. (29.230), 20.
Editorial: Realismo no combate à corrupção. (2013c). O Globo. (29.180), 22.
Editorial: Retomar a Paulista. (2013d). Folha de São Paulo. (30.752), A2.
Editorial: Vigilância democrática. (2013e). Folha de São Paulo. (30.834), A2.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
Freud, S. (2018 [1930]). Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. E-Artnow.
Goes, I., & Moszczynska, J. (2015). La Ley de Organización Criminal y las protestas de 2013 en Brasil: Reacciones de la prensa y la justicia. In M. Góngora-Mera, S. Costa & G. L. Gonçalves (Eds.), Derecho en América Latina: ¿corrector o (re)productor de desigualdades? (pp. 139–159). Working Paper Series / desiguALdades.net.
Gonçalves, G. L. (2021). Às voltas com o novo padrão expropriatório: crise do bolsonarismo e luta política atual. Revista Rosa, 4(2). https://bityli.com/ftaWTI. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Hayes, B. (2012). Counter-terrorism, ‘policy laundering’ and the FATF: legalising surveillance, regulating civil society. Transnational Institute/Statewatch. www.tni.org/files/download/fatf_report-update_0.pdf
Hostilizados, petistas abandonam ato pós-redução de tarifa em SP. (2013). Folha de São Paulo. (30,760), C5.
Jamais achei que ele fosse atirar. (2013). Folha de São Paulo. (30.755), A10.
Lavinas, L. (2013). 21st century welfare. New Left Review, 84, 5–40. https://bityli.com/SiPYtR. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Lavinas, L. (2015a). A financeirização da política social: O caso brasileiro. Politika, 2, 34–51.
Lavinas, L. (2015b). Em nome da austeridade. O Estado de São Paulo. https://bityli.com/lBVKXC. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Lavinas, L. (2017). The takeover of social policy by financialization: The Brazilian paradox. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lavinas, L., & Gonçalves, G. L. (2018). Brasil 2018: direitização das classes médias e polarização social. Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil. https://bityli.com/lGPRhX. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Lei nº 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013. (2013). Define organização criminosa e dispõe sobre a investigação criminal, os meios de obtenção da prova, infrações penais correlatas e o procedimento criminal; altera o Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940 (Código Penal); revoga a Lei nº 9.034, de 3 de maio de 1995; e dá outras providências. Presidência da República. https://bityli.com/bmFcx. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Loureiro, P. M., & Saad-Filho, A. (2019). The limits of pragmatism: The rise and fall of the Brazilian workers’ party (2002–2016). Latin American Perspectives, 224(46), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18805093
Machado, M., & Gonçalves, G. L. (2015). Por uma Lei Antiterrorismo de Estado. Ou não sobrará ninguém. Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil. https://bityli.com/KxdWG. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Maia, J. M. E., & Rocha, M. L. (2014). Protests, protests, everywhere: Will the “June Journeys” spoil Brazil’s bid for glory? The Cai ro Review of Global Affairs, 12, 79–85.
Maradei, A. (2013). Folha de S. Paulo e a cobertura dos protestos do MPL. [Paper presentation]. XXXVI Congresso Brasileiro de Ciências da Comunicação, Amazonas, Brasil. https://bityli.com/zTyXQI. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Marx, K. (1975[1894]). Das Kapital: Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Band 3. In Marx-Engels-Werke. Dietz Verlag.
McAdam, D. (1995). “Initiator” and “spin-off” movements: Diffusion processes in protest cycles. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action (pp. 217–240). Duke University Press.
Mendes, P., Costa, F., & Passarinho, N. (2013). Dilma propõe 5 pactos e plebiscito para constituinte da reforma política. G1. https://bityli.com/Lxzsm. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Morgan, M. (2018). Essays on income distribution: Methodological, historical and institutional perspectives with applications to the case of Brazil (1926–2016). [PhD thesis, School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences]. School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences Research Repository. https://bityli.com/VJuPDN. Accessed 9 May 2022.
NETSAL. (2013). Dossiê Temático: As jornadas de junho em perspectiva global. IESP/UERJ. https://bityli.com/DHRVF. Accessed 9 May 2022.
No, R. J. manifestantes presos são autuados por formação de quadrilha (2013). Jornal GGN. https://bityli.com/PZDsfZ. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Nossa, L. (2016). Justiça mantém sem-terra presos com base na lei antiterrostismo. O Estado de São Paulo. https://bityli.com/DMDHx. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Oliveira, F. (2003). The duckbilled platypus. New Left Review, 24, 40–57. https://bityli.com/FiQcPM. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Oliveira, F. (2006). O Momento Lênin. Novos Estudos, 75, 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002006000200003
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups.
Paulani, L. M. (2009). A crise do regime de acumulação com dominância da valorização financeira e a situação do Brasil. Estudos Avançados, 23(66), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142009000200003
Pavarini, M. (1996). I nuovi confini della penalità. Introduzione alla sociologia della penna. Martina.
PF Acompanha Protestos em SP; ministro da Justiça oferece ajuda. (2013). Notícias Terra. https://bityli.com/exPNc. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Pinheiro-Machado, R., & Scalco, L. M. (2018). Da esperança ao ódio: Juventude, política e pobreza do lulismo ao bolsonarismo. Revista IHU. https://bityli.com/uyIsoL. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Processar Manifestantes com Lei de Segurança Nacional e Lei de Organização Criminosa é uma violência contra a democracia brasileira. (2013). Justiça Global. https://bityli.com/PnzBcI. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Ribeiro, L. M. L., & Vilarouca, M. G. (2020). Neither hero nor villain: The determinants of confidence in the UPP police. Dados, 63, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2020.63.4.220
Rocha, C. (2019).“Menos Marx mais Mises”: uma gênese da nova direita brasileira (2006–2018). [PhD thesis, University of São Paulo]. University of São Paulo Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.8.2019.tde-19092019-174426
Rousseff, D. (2013). Pronunciamento da Presidenta da República. https://bityli.com/gkbhJg. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Russo, G. (2015). Em meio aos Protestos no Brasil, um Aumento Preocupante de Apoio à Intervenção Militar. Americas Barometer Insights Series, 112, 1–5. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/ITB019po.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Saad-Filho, A. (2011). Crise no neoliberalismo ou crise do neoliberalismo? Crítica e Sociedade, 1(3), 6–19. https://bityli.com/AcABh. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Saad-Filho, A. (2013). Mass protests under ‘left neoliberalism’: Brazil, June-July 2013. Critical Sociology, 39(5), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501906
Saad-Filho, A. (2014). Brazil: Development strategies and social change from import-substitution to the “Events of June.” Studies in Political Economy, 94, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2014.11674952. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Singer, A. (2013). Brasil, junho de 2013, classes e ideologias cruzadas. Novos Estudos, 97, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002013000300003
Soederberg, S. (2013). Universalising financial inclusion and the securitisation of development. Third World Quarterly, 34(4), 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.786285
Souza, A. (2013). Uso da lei das organizações criminosas é “aberração”, diz OAB. O Globo. https://bityli.com/DjYcVY. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Teixeira, A. C. E. M. (2014). Internet e Democracia: Cooperação, Conflito e o Novo Ativismo Político. [PhD thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro]. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.54879. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Titmuss, R. (1974). What is social policy? In B. Abel-Smith & K. Titmuss (Eds.), Social Policy: An Introduction (pp. 23–32). Pantheon Books.
World Bank. (2014). Social gains in the balance: A fiscal policy challenge for Latin America & the Caribbean. https://bityli.com/QwmFhw. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leite Gonçalves, G. Neoliberal Malaise, 2013 “June Journeys” and the Criminalization of the Protests in Brazil: a Re-reading Through Louis Althusser. Int J Polit Cult Soc 36, 499–526 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-022-09425-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-022-09425-y