Abstract
In this paper, which is positioned at the intersection of political sociology and the sociology of art, I discuss the implications of political art at the local level. I show how analyzing an existing example of locally engaged political art would contribute to the comprehension of the relationship between art and politics in contemporary societies. I employ a single case study, Freetown Christiania, in order to reveal the role of local artistic engagement in bringing about political outcomes, and in particular, relative autonomy at the local level. Though this study is solely focused on one community which has emerged within a specific context and time, it provides a unique lens to describe the relevance and potential of locally engaged political art for broader society. I utilize Freetown Christiania as an example of Benjaminian and Brechtian utopia in order to showcase how their micro-level artistic engagement has brought about relative autonomy at the local level. In particular, I describe the function of local artistic engagement in Freetown Christiania, especially their theatre group Solvognen (The Sun Chariot), as a unique artistic enterprise which has surpassed Benjamin’s and Brecht’s elaborations of the role of political art in modern societies through the employment of the elements of the avant-garde and postdramatic theatre. I argue that this peculiar combination of Benjaminian and Brechtian forms of political art on the one hand, and the avant-garde and postdramatic theatre on the other, has enabled them to create and sustain this micro-utopia in a neoliberal capitalist order.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Here one might wonder whether it makes sense to take Christianites’ self-understanding as artists at face value without critically engaging with what being an artist really entails in contemporary societies. I believe that such questioning would be very insightful for reconsidering and re-describing artists’ positions and statuses in the 21st century. However, that is beyond the scope of this paper in which I focus on Christianites’ artistic practices as they are presented to and/or co-produced with wider audiences in Copenhagen and beyond, not whether those are produced or co-produced by so-called artists.
References
Benjamin, W. (1966a). Understanding Brecht. Verso: London and New York.
Benjamin, Walter. 1966b [1938]. “The country where it is forbidden to mention the proletariat” in Understanding Brecht. Verso: London and New York: 37–42.
Benjamin, Walter. 1966c [1939]. “What is epic theatre? [second version]” in Understanding Brecht. Verso: London and New York: 15–22.
Benjamin, Walter. 1966d [from an unpublished manuscript]. “What is Epic Theatre? [First Version]” in Walter Benjamin, 1966, Understanding Brecht. Verso: London and New York: 1–14.
Benjamin, Walter. 1966e [from an unpublished manuscript]. “The Author as Producer” in Walter Benjamin, 1966, Understanding Brecht. Verso: London and New York: 85–104.
Benjamin, W. (1968 [1936]). “The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction” in Walter Benjamin, 1968, Illuminations: Essays and Reflections (pp. 217–251). New York: Schocken Books.
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso: London and New York.
Bloom, B. (2007). A magical land of roving Santa Claus armies, pirated energy drinks and a Giant squatted Urban Village: Political art activities in Denmark. In J. Macphee & E. Reuland (Eds.), 2007, Realizing the Impossible: Art Against Authority (pp. 130–151). California: AK Press.
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.
Brecht, B. (1926). Emphasis on sport. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 6–9). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1927a). A radio speech. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 18–20). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1927b). Shouldn’t we abolish aesthetics? In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 20–22). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1929). On form and subject-matter. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 29–31). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1930). The modern theatre is the epic theatre: Notes to the opera Aufstieg und Fall der Stadt Mahagonny. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 33–42). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1931). The Literarization of the theatre: Notes to the Threepenny opera. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 43–47). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1933). Indirect impact of the epic theatre: Extract from the notes to die mutter. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 57–62). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1934). Interview with an exile. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 65–69). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1935). Criticism of the New York production of die mutter. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 81–84). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1940). Two essays on unprofessional acting. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 148–153). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1950). The street scene: A basic model for an epic theatre. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 121–129). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1957a). Theatre for pleasure or theatre for instruction. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 69–77). New York: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1957b). On the use of music in an epic theatre. In J. Willett (Ed.), 1957, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of An Aesthetic (pp. 84–90). New York: Hill and Wang.
Bürger, P. (1984). Theory of the Avant-Garde. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Carney, S. (2005). Brecht and critical theory: Dialectics and contemporary aesthetics. London: Routledge.
Coppola, A., & Vanolo, A. (2015). Normalising autonomous spaces: Ongoing transformations in Christiania, Copenhagen. Urban Studies, 52(6), 1152–1168.
Fox, Porter. 2010. “The Last Stand of Free Town” The Believer. (https://believermag.com/the-last-stand-of-free-town/). Accessed December 18, 2017.
Giles, S. (1997). Bertolt Brecht and critical theory: Marxism, modernity and the Threepenny lawsuit. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hellström, M. (2006). Steal this place: The aesthetics of tactical formlessness and the free town of Christiania. Doctoral Thesis Submitted to Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Jarl, S., & Schultz, L. L. (2016). A sensuous dramaturgy of intervention: The sun chariot, Copenhagen, 1969-1983. In T. Ørum & J. Olsson (Eds.), 2016, A Cultural History of the Avant-Garde in the Nordic Countries 1950–1975 (pp. 681–691). Brill: Leiden.
Jorgensen, A. (1982). Touring the 1970’s with the Solvognen in Denmark. The Drama Review: TDR, 26(3), 15–28.
Lehmann, H.-T. (2006). Postdramatic theatre. London and New York: Routledge.
Mitchell, Stanley. 1972. “Introduction” in Walter Benjamin, 1966, Understanding Brecht Verso: London and New York: VII-XIX.
Winter, A. (2016). Environmental sustainability? We don’t have that here: Freetown Christiania as an unintentional ecovillage. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 15(1), 129–149.
Woltmann, M. (2016). Christiania – Utopia realised? In T. Ørum & J. Olsson (Eds.), 2016, A Cultural History of the Avant-Garde in the Nordic Countries 1950–1975 (pp. 668–680). Brill: Leiden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of national research committee in Denmark and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kökerer, C.M. Art and Politics in Freetown Christiania: a Benjaminian and Brechtian Utopia?. Int J Polit Cult Soc 34, 359–377 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-09341-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-09341-8