Advertisement

The Memory of Prevention. European Anti-Hate Crime Policy and Holocaust Remembrance

  • Thomas Brudholm
  • Birgitte Schepelern JohansenEmail author
Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

Cross-referencing between anti-hate crime policy work and Holocaust remembrance activities is not a rare phenomenon in a European context. Offhand, connecting anti-hate crime policy work and Holocaust remembrance is intelligible, since both are concerned with issues of racism, intolerance, and human rights violations. Thus, potentially, a “win-win” situation for actors from both fields. However, there are reasons for caution when bringing together two evils of a rather different magnitude as well as bringing together the different policy agendas. Through a combination empirical analysis and conceptual and normative reflections, the article unpack the premises and implications of connecting hate crime activism and Holocaust remembrance and it points towards two potential concerns. Firstly, anti-hate crime work is mainly forward-looking and preventive. It aims to mobilize and hence it will tend to prioritize a narrative and emotional simplicity. While Holocaust remembrance is also to some extent preventive and future-oriented (e.g., the promise of “Never Again”), there is also an ongoing obligation towards the details and complexities of the past. When the two domains are connected, there is a risk that the mobilizing aspects are prioritized too much. Secondly, when the Holocaust is evoked as the appropriate past for understanding the potential harm of hate crime, there is a danger of misrepresenting and over-dramatizing a vast proportion of the incidents that are currently reported and prosecuted as hate crimes. Thus, while the joining of agendas may be tempting, it also comes with a prize.

Keywords

Hate crime Holocaust Policy Criminal law Memory law Ethics Commemoration 

Notes

References

  1. Alexander, J. C. (2009). The social construction of moral universals. In J.C. Alexander et. al., Remembering the holocaust. A debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Assmann, A. (2010). The holocaust—a global memory? Extensions and limits of a new memory community. In A. Assmann & S. Conrad (Eds.), Memory in a global age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bleich, E. (2003). Race politics in Britain and France: ideas and policymaking since the 1960s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleich, E. (2018). From race to hate. A historical perspective. In T. Brudholm & B. S. Johansen (Eds.), Hate, politics, law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blustein, J. (2015). How the past matters. On the foundations of an ethics of remembrance. In K. Neumann & J. Thompson (Eds.), Historical justice and memory (pp. 77–92). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brudholm, T. (2016). Conceptualizing hate globally: is hate crime a human rights violation? In J. Schweppe & M. A. Walters (Eds.), The globalization of hate: internationalizing hate crime? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bull, A. C., & Lauge Hansen, H. (2016). On agonistic memory. Mem Stud, 9(4), 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodall, K. (2013). Conceptualizing ‘racism’ in criminal law. Leg Stud, 33(2), 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iganski, P. (2008). Hate crime and the city. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Iganski, P. & D. Smith (2011): Rehabilitation of hate crime offenders. Scotland: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs, J. B., & Potter, K. (1998). Criminal law and identity politics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jenness, V., & Grattet, R. (2001). Making hate a crime: from social movement to law enforcement. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Johansen, B. (2015). Hate as political outcast. Journal for European Ethnology, 45(2).Google Scholar
  15. Kahn, R. A. (2011). Holocaust denial and hate speech. In N. Hennebel & T. Hochmann (Eds.), Holocaust denial and the law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Karlsson, K.-G. (2003). Echoes of the holocaust. Historical cultures in contemporary Europe. Lund: Nordic. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Levy, D., & Sznaider, N. (2002). Memory unbound. The holocaust and the formation of cosmopolitan memory. Eur J Soc Theory, 5(1), 87–106.Google Scholar
  18. Novick, P. (1999). The holocaust and collective memory: the American experience New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  19. OSCE. (2009). Hate crime laws—a practical guide. Google Scholar
  20. Rothberg, M. (2009a). Multidirectional memory, remembering the holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rothberg, M. (2009b). Multidirectional memory and the universalization of the holocaust. In J.C. Alexander et. al, Remembering the holocaust. A debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schweppe, J., & Walters, M. A. (Eds.). (2016). The globalization of hate: internationalizing hate crime? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Suk, J.C. (2007). Equal By Comparison: Unsettling Assumptions of Antidiscrimination Law, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 55(2), 295–345.Google Scholar
  24. Thuge, S., & Brøndum, T. (Eds.). (2014). Forskellighed og fordomsfuldhed: Et undervisningsmateriale til lærere om intolerance, teaching material for public schools on intolerance. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.Google Scholar
  25. Todorov, T. (2001). Uses and abuses of history. In H. Marchicello (Ed.), What happens to history: the renewal of ethics in contemporary thoughts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Webber, M. (2011). Metaphorizing the holocaust. Images, VIII(15.16), 5–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Brudholm
    • 1
  • Birgitte Schepelern Johansen
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute for Cross Cultural and Regional StudiesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations