Advertisement

Back to Materialism. Reflections on Marx’s Conceptionof Labour, Praxis, Cooperatives and Libertarian Socialism

Article
  • 222 Downloads

Abstract

From Marx to Althusser, the materialist approach has tended to assume that individuals (that is, workers, proletarians and other social actors) unconsciously reproduce the social structures of capitalism that alienate them. It is assumed that individuals accept the conditions forced upon them and no longer seek to rebel against a world that substantially impoverishes their labour, their spirit and their creativity. In this paper, I suggest that by favouring Marx’s concept of alienation almost exclusively, there is a considerable risk that materialist thought will take only a negative path and remain stuck in the very Hegelian idealism that it intends to surpass. Whilst I acknowledge Marx’s significance to materialism, I argue that his stance should be combined with that of the anarchist and libertarian French thinker Proudhon. Proudhon presents a conception of the worker as more than just alienated. Workers can also cooperate and experience a reciprocity seemingly at odds with the character of capitalism. Under Proudhon’s influence materialism takes a positive turn, enabling us to avoid falling into the utopianism that the theory of social economy employs to critique capitalism—a utopianism that renders its critique even less effective than that of Marx. Today, Proudhonian theory also allows us to envisage the end of capitalism without necessarily rejecting the very concept of work. It thus improves on theories of ‘basic income’, for example, which persist in seeing in work nothing but negativity.

Keywords

Materialism Nineteenth century Proudhon Marx Libertarian socialism Alienation Labour Emancipation Cooperative theory Social economy Utopia Basic income 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers whose detailed knowledge of Proudhon proved to be invaluable and whose suggestions helped to improve the text significantly. I would also like thank Josh Booth in particular: Josh helped me in turning my thoughts into palatable English, and his expertise in social theory was remarkable.

References

  1. Althusser, L (2005) For Marx. Trans. by Ben Brewster, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Ansart, P. (1967). Sociologie de Proudhon. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  3. Ansart, P. (1969). Marx et l’anarchisme, Essai sur les sociologies de Saint Simon, Proudhon et Marx. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  4. Ansart, P. (1970). Naissance de l’anarchisme. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  5. Ansart, P. (1984). Proudhon. Textes et débats. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
  6. Ansart, P. (2003). Proudhon et les Canuts lyonnais. In M. Pucciarelli & A. Pessin (Eds.), Lyon & l’esprit proudhonien (pp. 45–62). Lyon: L’atelier de création libertaire.Google Scholar
  7. Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bancal, J. (1970). Proudhon. Pluralisme et autogestion. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.Google Scholar
  9. Boltanski, L & L Thévenot. (2006). On Justification. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky. N. (2013). On Anarchism. New York, London: The New Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chouraqui, F (2015) A principle of universal strife: Ricoeur and Merleau-Ponty’s Critiques of Marxist Universalism, 1953–1956. In Journal of the History of Ideas, 76 (3): 467–490.Google Scholar
  12. Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2015). Commun. Essai sur la révolution au XXI e Siècle. Paris: La découverte.Google Scholar
  13. Defourny, J (1992) Origins, forms and roles of a third major sector. In J. Defourny & J. L. Monzon Campos (Eds.), Economie sociale—the third sector. Brussel, De Boeck: 27–49.Google Scholar
  14. Defourny, J., Develtere, P., Fonteneau, B., & Nyssens, M. (2009). The worldwide making of the social economy. Innovations and changes. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  15. Desroche, H. (1976). Le projet coopératif. Paris: Les éditions ouvrières.Google Scholar
  16. Develtere, P. (1994). Co-operation and development. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, N., & Alldred, P. (2017). Sociology and the new materialism. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frère, B. (2009). Le nouvel esprit solidaire. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  19. Frère, B. (2013). The solidarity economy: emancipatory action to challenge politics. In R. Jozan, T. Voiturier, & S. Sundar (Eds.), Reducing inequalities, a sustainable development challenge (pp. 235–249). New Delhi: TERI press.Google Scholar
  20. Frère, B. (Ed.). (2015). Le tournant de la théorie critique. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  21. Frère, B; Reinecke, J (2011) Libertarian socialism and solidarity economy. In dialogues in critical management studies, 1: 117–127.Google Scholar
  22. Gardin, L. (2006). Les initiatives solidaires. Ramonville Saint-Agne: Erès.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorz, A (1982) Farewell to the working class. Trans. by Mike Sonenscher, Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gorz, A (1988) Métamorphose du travail, Quête du sens. Critique de la raison économique. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  25. Gorz, A. (1997). Misère du present, Richesse du possible. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  26. Graeber, D. (2004). Fragment of an anarchist anthropology. Cambridge: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gurvitch, G. (1965). Proudhon. Sa vie, son oeuvre. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, M. (1971). The sociology of Pierre Joseph Proudhon. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  29. Haubtmann, P. (1947). Marx et Proudhon: Leurs Rapports Personnels (pp. 1844–1847). Lyon: Economie et Humanisme.Google Scholar
  30. Haubtmann, P. (1980). La philosophie sociale de P.J. Proudhon. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  31. Haubtmann, P. (1981). Proudhon, Marx et la pensée allemande. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  32. Hegel, GWF (1977) Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. By Arnlod V. Miller, Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hoffman, R.-L. (1972). Revolutionary justice. The social and political theory of P.J. Proudhon. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  34. Holloway, J. (2002). Change the world without taking power. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  35. Holloway, J. (2010). Crack capitalism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, C. H. (1974). Utopian communism in France: Cabet and the Icarians, 1839–1851. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Karatani, K. (2003). Transcritique. On Kant and Marx. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lefort, C. (1979). L’expérience prolétarienne. In Lefort C Eléments d’une critique de la bureaucratie (pp. 71–97). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, K [1867] 1964 Rules and Administrative Regulations of the International Workingmen’s Association. In The general council of the first international. Moscow, Progress Publishers: 265–270.Google Scholar
  40. Marx, K (1977) Capital. A critique of political economy, vol 1. Trans. by Ben Fowkes, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  41. Marx, K (1981) Capital, vol.3. Trans. by David Fernbach, London: Pelican Books – New Left Review.Google Scholar
  42. Marx, K (2014) The poverty of philosophy. Trans. By Harry Quelch, Mansfield Center : Martino Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Marx, K; Engels, F (2011) Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844. Trans. by Martin Milligan, Blacksburg: Wilder.Google Scholar
  44. Mc Kay, I. (2011). Property is theft! A Pierre-Joseph Proudhon anthology. Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
  45. Méda, D. (1995). Le travail, une valeur en voie de disparition. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  46. Moulaert, F; Ailenei, O (2005) Social economy, third sector and solidarity relations: a conceptual synthesis from history to present. In Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037–2053.Google Scholar
  47. Mounier, E. (1966). Court traité de la mythique de gauche. In Mounier E Communisme, anarchie et personnalisme (pp. 9–56). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  48. Neamtan, N (2005) The social economy: finding a way between the market and the state. In policy options, 71, 71–76.Google Scholar
  49. Noland, A (1967) Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: socialist as social scientist. In The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 26(3), 313–328.Google Scholar
  50. Parker, M., Fournier, V., & Reedy, R. (2007). The dictionary of alternatives: utopianism and organization. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  51. Prichard, A. (2013). Justice, order and anarchy. The international political theory of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Proudhon, P-J [1848] 2011 Organisation of credit and circulation and the solution of the social problem. In Ian McKay (Ed.), Property is theft! A Pierre-Joseph Proudhon anthology. Oakland, AK Press: 282–293.Google Scholar
  53. Proudhon, P-J [1849] 2011 Bank of the people. In Ian Mc Kay (Ed.), Property is theft! A Pierre-Joseph Proudhon anthology. Oakland, AK Press: 383–393.Google Scholar
  54. Proudhon, P-J (1847) The misery of philosophy. Trans. Benjamin R. Tucker, Available at http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/philosophy/. Accessed 24 Oct 2014.
  55. Proudhon, P-J (1840) What is property? Trans. Benjamin R. Tucker, Available at http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/. Accessed 24 Oct 2014.
  56. Proudhon, P.-J. (1957). Manuel du spéculateur à la Bourse. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
  57. Proudhon, P.-J. (1977). De la capacité politique des classes ouvrières (Vol. 1-2). Paris: Editions du monde libertaire.Google Scholar
  58. Proudhon P-J (1988) De la justice dans la révolution et dans l’Eglise. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  59. Ricoeur, P. (1988). Lectures on ideology and utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Roberts, L. J (1991) Etienne Cabet and his Voyage en Icarie. In utopian studies, 2 (1–2): 77–95.Google Scholar
  61. Rubin, J. H. (1980). Realism and social vision in Courbet and Proudhon. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Rude, F. (1977). C’est nous les canuts. Paris: Maspéro.Google Scholar
  63. Salem, J (1996) Introduction aux manuscrits de 1844. In Marx K Manuscrits de 1844. French trans. Jean-Pierre Gougeon. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Google Scholar
  64. Les Soixantes (1977b1977a) Manifeste des soixante ouvriers de la Seine. In Proudhon P-J De la capacité politique des classes ouvrières, vol. 2. Paris : Éditions du Monde libertaire: pp. 420–429Google Scholar
  65. Srnicek, N., & Williams, A. (2015). Inventing the future. Postcapitalism and a world without work. London, Verso.Google Scholar
  66. Thomas, P. (1980). Karl Marx and the Anarchists. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Van Parijs, P., & Vanderbroght, Y. (2017). Basic income. A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Vincent, R.-S. (1984). Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and the rise of French republican socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wright, E.O. (2010). Envisioning real Utopias. London, New york: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FNRS, University of LiegeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations