Advertisement

Global Sociology: Towards an Alternative Southern Paradigm

  • Ronaldo MunckEmail author
Article

Abstract

The project to (re)construct a global sociology is one where there is no agreed paradigm or even a shared understanding of the main issues that would be needed to secure a new robust and credible paradigm. What I seek to do here is to simply clarify the terms of the debate so as to establish whether we might pursue the quest for an alternative paradigm with some conviction. I first consider the ‘strong case’ for a global sociology based on the assumptions of globalisation theory which, overall, seems to suffer from economism in my view. Next I present a postcolonial perspective which posits a fundamental division between the global South and the North, an enterprise I find to be marked by a certain culturalism. I then present elements for an alternative approach towards a new paradigm based on an understanding of complexity, uneven development and the politics of scale. A brief Latin American excursus at the end seeks to provide some texture to the overall argument that a new global sociology could develop through a critical Southern lens and a focus on cultural political economy.

Keywords

Global sociology Postcolonialism Critical sociology Latin America Inequality Emancipation 

References

  1. Acosta, A. (2010). El buen vivir en el camino del post-desarollo. Friederich Ebert Stiftung, Policy Paper No. 9.Google Scholar
  2. Albrow, M. (1996). The global age: State and society beyond modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (1970). Reading capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Arrighi, G., Silver, B., & Brewer, B. (2003). Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of the north–south divide. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aschroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (Eds.). (1995). The post-colonial studies reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Balibar, E. (1995). The philosophy of Marx. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Bartra, R. (2002). Blood, ink and culture: Miseries and splendors of the post-mexican political condition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations. NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  9. Best, J., & Paterson, M. (Eds.). (2010). Cultural political economy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bhambra, G. (2007). Sociology and postcolonialism: Another ‘missing’ revolution? Sociology, 4(5), 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhambra, G. (2014). Connected sociologies. Bloomsbury AcademicGoogle Scholar
  12. Bieler, A., Lindberg, I., & Pillay, D. (Eds.). (2008). Labour and the challenges of globalization. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  13. Bisley, N. (2007). Rethinking globalization. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Burawoy, M. (2008). Rejoinder: For a subaltern sociology. Current Sociology, 56(3), 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Calderón, F., Hopenhayn, M., & Ottone, E. (1996). Esa esquiva modernidad: Desarollo, ciudadanía y cultura en América Latina y el Caribe. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
  16. Canclini, N. G. (1995). Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. Minneapolis: University Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Canclini, N. G. (2002). Latinoamericanos buscando lugar en este siglo. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
  18. Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1969). Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  19. Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Castells, M. (1996). The information age—Volume I: The rise of network society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Castells, M. (1997). The information age—Volume II: The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Chandhoke, N. (2005). How global is global civil society? Journal of World Systems Research, 11(2), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chernilo, D. (2011). The critique of methodological nationalism: Theory and history. Thesis Eleven, 106(1), 98–117.Google Scholar
  24. Coates, D. (2005). Varieties of capitalism: Varieties of approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen, R., & Kennedy, P. (2000). Global sociology. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Cohen, R., & Kennedy, P. (2013). Global sociology (3rd ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory. The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Coronil, F. (2008). Elephants in the Americas? Latin American postcolonial studies and global decolonization. In M. Moraña, E. Dussel, & C. Jáuregui (Eds.), Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate (pp. 396–416). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Day, R., & Gaido, D. (2009). Witnesses to permanent revolution. Chicago: Haymarket.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Delaney, D., & Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16(2), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drainville, A. (2004). Contesting globalisation: Space and place in the world economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Eisenstadt, S. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  33. Escobar, A. (2010). Worlds and knowledges otherwise: The Latin American modernity /coloniality research program. In W. Mignolo & A. Escobar (Eds.), Globalization and the decolonial option (pp. 33–64). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Firebaugh, G. (2003). The new geography of global income inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty–first century. Farrar, Straus and GirouxGoogle Scholar
  36. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial theory: A critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ghemawat, P. (2007). Why the world isn’t flat. Foreign Policy, March-AprilGoogle Scholar
  39. Gouldner, A. (1970). The coming crisis of western sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  41. Grzanka, P. (2014). Intersectionality: A foundations and frontiers reader. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  42. Habermas, J. (1985). A philosophical-political interview. New Left Review, I (15) (May – June).Google Scholar
  43. Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional framework of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hart, G. (2002). Disabling globalization: Places of power in post-apartheid South Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Herod, A. (2001). Labor geographies: Workers and the landscapes of capitalism. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  46. Jessop, B., & Sum, N. L. (2010). Pre-disciplinary and post-disciplinary perspectives. New Political Economy, 6(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kapoor, I. (2008). The postcolonial politics of development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Kay, C. (1989). Latin American theories of development and underdevelopment. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Lutz, H., Vivar, M. T. H., & Supik, L. (2011). Framing intersectionality: Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  50. McEwan, C. (2009). Postcolonialism and development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Mezzadra, S. (2011). How many histories of labour? Towards a theory of postcolonial capitalism. Postcolonial Studies, 14(2), 151–170.Google Scholar
  52. Mignolo, W., & Escobar, A. (Eds.). (2010). Globalization and the decolonial option. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Milanović, B. (2011). Global inequality: From class to location, from proletarians to migrants. Policy Research Working Paper 5820. Poverty and Inequality Team: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  54. Moore, A. (2008). Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography, 32(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Munck, R. (1999). Labour in the global: Challenges and prospects. In R. Cohen & S. Rai (Eds.), Social movements in the global age (pp. 83–100). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  56. Munck, R. (2002). Labour and globalisation: A new great transformation? London: Zed Book.Google Scholar
  57. Munck, R. (2006). Global civil society: Royal road or slippery path. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Munck, R. (2007). Globalization and contestation: The new great counter-movement. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  59. Munck, R. (2013a). Rethinking Latin America: Development, hegemony and social transformation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Munck, R. (2013b). The precariat: A view from the South. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 747–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Patel, S. (Ed.). (2010). The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Patel, S. (Ed.) (2014). Afterword: Doing global sociology: Issues, problems and challenges. Current Sociology, 62(4), 603–613.Google Scholar
  63. Phillips, A. (1992). Universal pretensions in political thought. In M. Barrett & A. Phillips (Eds.), Destabilizing theory: Contemporary feminist debates. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  64. Quijano, A. (2008). Coloniality of power, eurocentrism and social classification. In M. Moraña, E. Dussel, & C. Jáuregui (Eds.), Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate (pp. 181–224). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Radcliffe, S. (2011). Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonization in Ecuador. Geoforum, 43(2), 240–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ramirez, R. (2010). Socialismo del sumak kawsay o biosocialismo republicano. In Los nuevos retos de América Latina: Socialismo y Sumak Kawsay. Quito: SENPLADES.Google Scholar
  67. Reed, I. A. (2013). Theoretical labors necessary for a global sociology: Critique of Raewyn Connell’s Southern Theory. In J. Go (Ed.), Decentering social theory (pp. 157–171). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reigadas, M. C. (1998). Neomodernidad y posmodernidad: Preguntando desde América Latina. In E. Marí (Ed.), Posmodernidad. Biblio Editores: Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  69. Robinson, W. (2011). Globalization and the sociology of Immanuel Wallerstein: A critical appraisal. International Sociology, 26(6), 723–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Romero, M., & Margolis, E. (Eds.). (2005). The Blackwell companion on social inequalities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  71. Said, E. (2002). A conversation with Neeladri Bhattacharya, Suvir Kaul, and Ania Loomba. In T. Goldberg & A. Quayson (Eds.), Relocating postcolonialism (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  72. Schmidt, V. (2006). Multiple modernities or varieties of modernity? Current Sociology, 54(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Silver, B. (2003). Forces of labor: Workers’ movements and globalization since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sklair, L. (2001). Globalization: Capitalism and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sklair, L. (2002). Sociology of the global system. Harvester: Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  76. Smart, B. (2003). Economy, culture, and society: A sociological critique of meoliberalism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Smith, N. (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  78. Stevis, D., & Boswell, T. (2008). Globalization and labor: Democratizing global governance. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  79. Stiglitz, J. (2006). Making globalization work. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  80. Sum, N. G., & Jessop, B. (2014). Towards a cultural political economy. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  81. Therborn, G. (1976). Science, slass and society: On the formation of sociology and historical materialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  82. Urry, J. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  83. Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world-economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Wallerstein, I. (1996). Open the social sciences. Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Webster, E., Lambert, R., & Bezuidenhout, A. (2008). Grounding globalization: Labour in the age of insecurity. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams, P., & Chrisman, L. (Eds.). (1994). Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, G. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. World Bank. (2000). World development report 2000–2001: Attacking poverty. Washington DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civic Engagement OfficeDublin City UniversityGlasnevinIreland

Personalised recommendations