Security Dimension of Post-conflict Recovery: Nepal's Experience in Disarmament and Demobilisation of People's Liberation Army Fighters

  • D. B. SubediEmail author


Disarmament and demobilisation of ex-combatants often involve politicised sequence of activities, and, in turn, they can affect national and local politics and the peace process in question in one way or other. Understanding the interface between transitional politics, and disarmament and demobilisation of ex-combatants is, therefore, vital to explore scope and limitation of how ex-combatants are managed as part of post-conflict recovery in a post-conflict society. Building on this proposition, this paper investigates the impacts of transitional politics to disarmament and demobilisation (D&D) of the Maoist ex-combatants as part of management of the Maoist arms and armies in Nepal. Analysing how a consensus-based political culture between major political parties, including the Maoists, which was a driving force behind the peace negotiation, deteriorated over time, and further exploring strategic needs and interests of key political actors towards D&D, this paper shows that disarmament of the Maoists People's Liberation Army followed a “blanket disarmament” approach which had limitations to fully disarm the force. Similarly, demobilisation process appeared to be encampment of the force rather than complete demobilisation. This paper warns that faulty disarmament and demobilisation in Nepal can have serious security implications in future.


Disarmament Demobilisation Ex-combatants Maoist Post-conflict recovery Peacebuilding Nepal 


  1. Ball, N., & van de Goor, L. (2006). Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration—Mappping issues, dilemmas and guiding principles. Netherlands Institute of International Relations, Conflict Reseach Unit, 'Clingendael'.Google Scholar
  2. Barbara, W. (2002). Committing to peace: The successful resettlement of civil wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berdal, M. (1996). Disarmament and demobilization after civil wars. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press for International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Berdal, M., & Ucko, D. H. (Eds.). (2009). Reintegrating armed groups after conflict: Politics, violence and transition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bleie, T., & Shrestha, R. (2012). DDR in Nepal: stakeholder politics and implicaiton for reintegration as a process of disengament. Tromso: Centre for Peace Studies, University of Tromso.Google Scholar
  6. Collier, P. (1994). Demobilization and insecurity: A study in the economics of the transition from war to peace. Journal of International Development, 6(3), 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Sales, A. (2003). The Kham Magar country Nepal: Between ethnic claims and Maoism. In D. Thapa (Ed.), Understanding the Maoist movement of Nepal (pp. 59–88). Kathmandu: Martin Chautrai.Google Scholar
  8. de Zeeuw, J. (Ed.). (2008). From soldiers to politicians: Transforming rebel movements after civil war. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  9. Gautam, K. (2009). The rehabilitation and integration of Maoists combatants as part of Nepal’s security sector reform. In R. Bhattarai & R. Cave (Eds.), Changing security dynamics in Nepal. Lodon: Saferworld.Google Scholar
  10. Glassmyer, K., & Sambanis, N. (2008). Rebel-military integration and civil war termination. Journal of Peace Research, 45(3), 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knight, M. (2008). Expanding the DDR model: Politics and organizations. Journal of Security Sector Managment, 6(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  12. Knight, M., & Ozerdem, A. (2004). Guns, camps and cash: Disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion of former combatants in transitions from war to peace. Journal of Peace Research, 41(4), 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leve, L. G. (2007). ‘Failed development’ and rural revolutions in Nepal: Rethinking subaltern consciousness and women empowerment. Anthropological Quarterly, 80(1), 127–172.Google Scholar
  14. Mahat, R. S. (2005). In defence of democracy: Dynamics, and fault lines of Nepal’s political economy. New Delhi: Adroit Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Muggah, R. (2005). No magic bullet: A critical perspective on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) and weapons reduction in post-conflict contexts. The Round Table, 94(379), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muggah, R. (Ed.). (2009). Security and post conflict reconstruction: Dealing with fighters in the aftermath of war. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Muggah, R., & Baare, A. (2009). Negotiating reintegration in Uganda: Dealing with combatants during peace processes. In R. Muggah (Ed.), Security and post-conflict reconstruction: Dealing with fighters in the aftermath of war (pp. 226–247). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Muggah, R., Berdal, M., & Torjesen, S. (2009). Conclusions: Enter an evidence-based security promotion. In R. Muggah (Ed.), Security and post conflict reconstruction: Dealing with fighters in the aftermath of war (pp. 268–284). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Murshed, S. M., & Gates, S. (2005). Spatial-horizontal inequality and the maoist insurgency in Nepal. Review of Development Economics, 9(1), 121–134.Google Scholar
  20. Onesto, L. (2003). Report from the people’s war. In D. Thapa (Ed.), Understanding the Maoist movement of Nepal (pp. 151–180). Kathmandu: Martin Chautari.Google Scholar
  21. Ozerdem, A. (2002). Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of former combatants in Afganistan: Lessons learned from a cross-cultural perspective. Third World Quarterly, 23(5), 961–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ozerdem, A. (2009). Post-war recovery: Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  23. Ozerdem, A., Podder, S., O’Callaghan, S., & Pantuliano, S. (2008). Reinsertion assistance and the reintegration of ex-combatants in war to peace transitions Thematic Working Paper 4. Bradford: Center for Internatinal Coopearation and Security, Bradford University.Google Scholar
  24. Pfaff-Czarnecka, J. (2004). High expectations-deep disappointment: Politics, state and society in Nepal after 1990. In D. Thapa (Ed.), Himalayan people’s war: Nepal’s Maoist rebellion (pp. 166–191). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Pouligny, B. (2004). The politics and anti-politics of disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programmes. Paris: Science-Politique/CERI.Google Scholar
  26. Rolston, B. (2007). Demobilization and reintegration of ex-combatants: The Irish case in international perspective. Social and Legal Studies, 16, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shah, R. (2003). Idea and reality: Nepal and Rolpa. In D. Thapa (Ed.), Understanding the Maoist movement of Nepal (pp. 49–52). Kathmandu: Martin Chautari.Google Scholar
  28. Sharma, K. (2006). The political economy of civil war in Nepal. World Development, 34(7), 1237–1253.Google Scholar
  29. Torjesen, S. (2006). The political economy of disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) selective literature review and preliminary agenda (vol. paper no. 709): Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI).Google Scholar
  30. Torjesen, S., & MacFarlane, S. N. (2009). Reintegration before disarmament: The case of post-conflict reintegration in Tajikistan. In M. Berdal & D. H. Ucko (Eds.), Reintegrating groups after conflict: Politics, violence and transition (pp. 47–66). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. von Einsiedel, S., Malone, D. M., & Pradhan, S. (2012). Introduction. In S. von Einsiedel, D. M. Malone, & S. Pradhan (Eds.), Nepal in Transition: From People’s War to Fragile Peace (pp. 1–36). Cambridge and New York: Centre on International Cooperation (CIC) and Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Peace StudiesUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations