Politics and Culture in an Age of Austerity

  • Amitai EtzioniEmail author


The Great Recession forced many people around to cut back on consumption and is one reason that drives the rise of right-wing forces. One response to the downturn has been a call for a return to high-level growth and consumption of goods. By contrast, this paper argues in favor of an alternative conception of the good life. To defend this thesis, it first surveys the social science literature regarding the relationship between income and happiness, noting that the growth of the former does not necessarily translate to improvements in the latter. Next, it provides a number of explanations of why greater income and consumption often do not yield greater happiness. The paper then goes on to discuss historical and theoretical alternatives to consumerism-driven life and society. Finally, it discusses how happiness can best be found in socializing with others, participating in the community, and engaging in spiritual and intellectual pursuits. The paper, thus, concludes that human contentment and flourishing is perhaps best found outside of the high-growth, high-consumption paradigm. Moreover, it finds that such a new normal is not only protective of the environment, but also enhances social justice.


New normal Happiness Great Recession Income Easterlin Paradox The good life 


  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batson, D. C., & Powell A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. Handbook of Psychology. Three: 463–484. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1976). Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness: economics and sociobiology. Journal of Economic Literature, 14(3), 817–826.Google Scholar
  4. Bendix, R. (1977). Max Weber: an intellectual portrait (p. 124). California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness: what government can learn from the new research on well being (p. 19). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2005). Introduction. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: framing the analysis (p. 20). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. Accessed 24 Jan 2014.
  11. Cacioppo, J., & Hawkley, L. C. (2003). Social Isolation and Health, with an Emphasis on Underlying Mechanisms. Perspectives on Biology and Medicine, 46(3), (pp. S39-S52).Google Scholar
  12. Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Koustas D. (2013). Amerisclerosis? The puzzle of rising U.S. unemployment persistence. The Brookings Institution.
  13. Diener, E., Horwitz, J., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Happiness of the very wealthy. Social Indicators Research, 16(3), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorling, D. (2010). Injustice: why social inequalities persist. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dorning, M. (2013). Americans turn on Washington, 68% say wrong track in poll. Bloomberg.
  16. Easterlin, R. (1973). Does money buy happiness. The Public Interest, 30, 3–10.Google Scholar
  17. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Easterlin, R. (2005). Diminishing marginal utility of income? Caveat emptor. Social Indicators Research, 70(3), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Easterlin, R., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. PNAS, 107(52), 22463–22468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Etzioni, A. (1996). The new golden rule: community and morality in a democratic society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Etzioni, A. (1998). The moral dimension: toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Etzioni, A. (2004). From empire to community. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Euro RSCG Worldwide. (2010). Prosumer report: the emergence of the new consumer. Euro RSCG Knowledge Exchange., p. 20.
  24. Frank, R. H. (2007). Falling behind: how rising inequality harms the middle class (pp. 29–42). California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Freedman, J. L. (1978). Happy people: what happiness is, who has it, and why. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness prospers in democracy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friedman, B. (2006). The moral consequences of economic growth. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  28. Gallup. Confidence in institutions. (2013).
  29. Goffman, E., & Helmreich, W. B. (1961). Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates (Vol. 277). New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, J. (1986). Egoism, altruism, and market illusions: the limits of law and economics. UCLA Law Review, 33.Google Scholar
  31. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). Well-being, social capital and public policy: what’s new? Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopkins, E. (2008). Inequality, happiness and relative concerns: what actually is their relationship? Journal of Economic Inequality, 6, 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ingram & Katic I. (2012, August 16). Does income inequality matter for life satisfaction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Colorado Convention Center and Hyatt Regency, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  34. Jacob, J. C., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (1997). Values, performance and subjective well-being in the sustainability movement: an elaboration of multiple discrepancy theory. Social Indicators Research, 42(2), 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jargon J. (2010). Wealthy take bigger helping of fast food. Wall Street Journal.
  36. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(38), 16489–16493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2012). Income, aspirations and the hedonic treadmill in a poor society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lane, R. E. (1993). Does money buy happiness? The Public Interest, 113, 56–65.Google Scholar
  40. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: lessons from a new science (pp. 32–35). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  41. Magen, Z. (1996). Commitment beyond the self and adolescence: the issue of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 37(3), 235–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy. Psychological Science, 6(1), 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1996). The pursuit of happiness. Scientific American, 274(5), 70–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newport, F. (2009). In U.S., 32% Say Spending Less Is Their New Normal. GALLUP Economy.
  45. Nussbaum, M. (2005). Mill between Aristotle and Bentham. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: framing and analysis (p. 173). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Packard, V., & Abbott, B. (1963). The status seekers: an exploration of class behaviour in America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  47. Pew Research Center. (2010). How the great recession has changed life in America (pp. 7–8). Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  48. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: how religion divides and unites us (p. 490). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  50. Ricard, M. (2000). Happiness: a guide to developing life’s most important skill (p. 19). New York: Brown.Google Scholar
  51. Riesman, D. (1993). Abundance for what? New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  52. Ross, W. D., trans (1987). Aristotle, The Niocomachean Ethics. Amherst: Prometheus Books. p. 54. I.4 [2].Google Scholar
  53. Sachs, J. D. (2013). Restoring virtue ethics in the quest for happiness. In: John Helliwell, Richard Layard, and Jeffrey Sachs (eds). World Happiness Report 2013. p. 85.Google Scholar
  54. Schor, J. (2010). Plenitude: the new economics of true wealth. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  55. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: judgmental processes and their methodological implications. Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  57. Senior, J. (2006). Some dark thoughts on happiness. New York Magazine.
  58. Senior, J. (2010). All joy and no fun. New York Magazine.
  59. Skidelsky, R., & Skidelsy, E. (2012). How much is enough? Money and the good life (pp. 162–163). New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  60. Steinmetz, K. (2013). The 9%: Congress’s approval rating hits the single digits. TIME.
  61. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, 39(1), 1–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Chassein, B., Kern, D., & Wagner, D. (1990). Salience of comparison standards and the activation of social norms: consequences for judgements of happiness and their communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(4), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sugden, R. (2005). Correspondence of sentiments: an explanation of the pleasure of social interaction. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: framing the analysis (pp. 97–98). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Tarnas, R. (1991). The passion of the Western mind: understanding the ideas that have shaped our world view. Ballantine Books, 1991, 58.Google Scholar
  65. The Economist. (2010). Economic focus: the joyless or the jobless, p 84.Google Scholar
  66. The Economist. (2012). The last Kodak moment?
  67. Veenhoven, R., & Hagerty, M. (2006). Rising happiness in nations 1946–2004: a reply to Easterlin. Social Indicators Research, 79, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2013). The Easterlin illusion: economic growth does go with greater happiness. EHERO working paper.
  69. Wang, S. (2007). Aquinas on human happiness and the natural desire for God. New Blackfriars, 88(1015), 322–334 (p. 322).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2011). The spirit level. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations