Traditional Cleavages or a New World: Does Online Social Networking Bridge the Political Participation Divide?

  • Jason Gainous
  • Adam David Marlowe
  • Kevin M. Wagner
Article

Abstract

There is a growing literature that examines the effects of the Internet on political participation. We seek to contribute to this literature by exploring how online social networking may stimulate online political participation. Using survey data from the Pew Internet & American Life Project, we confirm a strong positive relationship and show that this effect is driven by the level of political exchange within networks. Further, we explore the potential for the Internet to dissipate traditional cleavages in participation that tend to mirror the inequalities in the availability and use of technology. The findings suggest that while many of the “have-nots” do engage in online networking at higher rates than their counterparts, they are less likely to be exposed to political exchanges within their networks. As a result, the effect of online networking on participation is more pronounced for the “haves.” We discuss the implications of these findings.

Keywords

Social media Political participation Digital divide Social class 

References

  1. Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bode, L. (2012). Facebooking it to the polls: a study in online social networking and political behavior. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 9(4), 352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  5. Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. M. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2001). The private roots of public action: gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carpini, D., Michael, X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ellison, N. B., Steinfeld, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4).Google Scholar
  12. Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. (2007). The electronic ballot box: a rational voting model and the internet. American Review of Politics, 28(Spring and Summer), 19–35.Google Scholar
  13. Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2011). Rebooting American politics: the internet revolution. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Gant, M., & Lyons, W. (1993). Democratic theory, non-voting, and public policy: the 1972–1988 presidential elections. American Politics Quarterly, 21(2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, K. Q., & Leighley, J. E. (1993). Party ideology, organization, and competitiveness as mobilizing forces in gubernatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1158–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoge, P. (January 26, 2009). Facebook dethrones MySpace. Jacksonville Business Journal.Google Scholar
  17. Horton, N. J., & Lipsitz, S. R. (2001). Multiple imputation in practice: comparison of software packages for regression models with missing variables. The American Statistician, 55, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klofstad, C. A. (2007). Talk leads to recruitment: how discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klofstad, C. A. (2009). Civic talk and civic participation: the moderating effect of individual predispositions. American Politics Research, 37(5), 856–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. La Due Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leighley, J. E., & Nagler, J. (1992). Socioeconomic bias in turnout 1964–1988: the voters remain the same. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lenhart, A. (2009). Adults and social network websites. Pew Internet & American Life Project, January 14. Washington: Pew Research Center. Available: http://www.pewInternet.org/Reports/2009/Adults-and-Social-Network-Websites.aspx.. Accessed: 18 March 2010.
  23. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley. Led by Facebook, Twitter, global time spend on social media sites up 82 % year over year. Nielsenwire.com, January 22, 2010. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/led-by-facebook-twitter-global-time-spent-on-social-media-sites-up-82-year-over-year/. Accessed: 15 March 2010.
  24. McClurg, S. D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: the role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449–464.Google Scholar
  25. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: beyond the digital divide. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: the internet, society and participation. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  27. Nielson (2010). Led by Facebook, Twitter, Global Time Spent on Social Media Sites up 82 % Year over Year. Available: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/led-by-facebook-twitterglobal-time-spent-on-social-media-sites-up-82-year-over-year/. Accessed: 25 January 2013.
  28. Nyland, R., Raquel, M., & Jason, B. (2007). MySpace: social networking or social isolation? Paper Presented at the Midwinter Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, February 23–24, Reno.Google Scholar
  29. Pasek, J., More, E., & Romer, D. (2009). Realizing the social internet? Online social networking meets offline civic engagement. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6(3/4), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: how increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. In R. G. Niemi & H. F. Weisberg (Eds.), Controversies in voting behavior. Washington: CQ.Google Scholar
  32. Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  34. Putnam, R. D., Feldstein, L. M., & Cohen, D. (2003). Better together: restoring the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  35. Scheufele, D. A., & Shah, D. V. (2000). Personality strength and social capital—the role of dispositional and informational variables in the production of civic participation. Communication Research, 27(2), 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010). Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the Internet. Perspectives on Politics., 8(2), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schuller T. (2000). Social and human capital: the search for appropriate technomethodology. Policy Studies, 21(1), 25–35.Google Scholar
  38. Shah, D. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: an individual-level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19(3), 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Lance Holbert, R. (2001). ‘Connecting’ and ‘disconnecting’ with civic life: patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18(2), 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: political democracy and social equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wagner, K., & Gainous, J. (2009). Electronic grassroots: does online campaigning work. Journal of Legislative Studies, 15(4), 502–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Gainous
    • 1
  • Adam David Marlowe
    • 2
  • Kevin M. Wagner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations