Advertisement

The Post-1989 Era as Heyday of the Nation-State?

  • Aviel RoshwaldEmail author
Article
  • 276 Downloads

Abstract

It is widely held that contemporary globalization is bringing about the decline of the nation-state. This article questions this assumption, using a historical perspective to make the case that it is only in the wake of the global transformations since 1989 that the principle of national self-determination has truly had the opportunity to come into its own. It is precisely the supranational structures associated with contemporary globalization that have the potential to facilitate political independence for small nations without the attendant geopolitical and economic vulnerabilities that condemned such undertakings to catastrophic failure in earlier eras. Despite the dangers and abuses historically associated with the nation-state, the alternative of unbounded political communities carries even greater potential risks.

Keywords

Nation-state Nationalism Self-determination Globalization 

References

  1. Acton, J. (1919). Nationality (essay first published in 1862). In J. Acton (Ed.), The history of freedom and other essays (pp. 270–300). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Black, J. (1998). Lord Acton’s theory of the supranational state and today’s Europe: between the tradition of the British Empire and of the Holy Roman Empire. The European Legacy, 3(6), 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed: nationhood and the national question in the new Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, E. (2000). The Athenian nation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Colley, L. (1992). Britons: forging the nation, 1707–1837. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Colomer, J. (2007). Great empires, small nations: the uncertain future of the sovereign state. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, B. (1992). The black man’s burden: Africa and the curse of the nation-state. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Domarus, M. (1987). Hitler: Reden und Proklamationen, 1932–1945 (vol. 3). Würzburg: Mainpresse Richterdruck.Google Scholar
  10. Duara, P. (2003). Sovereignty and authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian modern. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Ernst, D. (1997). From partial to systemic globalization: International production networks in the electronics industry. The Data Storage Industry Globalization Project Report 97–02, Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, UC San Diego, and BRIE Working Paper #98, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley. http://brie.berkeley.edu/publications/WP%2098.pdf
  12. Han, S. (2004). The problem of sovereignty: Manchukuo, 1932–1937. Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, 12(2), 457–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirsch, F. (2005). Empire of nations: ethnographic knowledge and the making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Manchoukuo Bureau of Information and Publicity, Department of Foreign Affairs (1933). The voice of the people of Manchoukuo (pp. 15, 22–26). Hsinking, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  15. Manela, E. (2007). The Wilsonian moment: self-determination and the international origins of anticolonial nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, T. (2001). The affirmative action empire: nations and nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mitter, R. (2000). The Manchurian myth: nationalism, resistance, and collaboration in modern China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Prusin, A. (2010). The lands between: conflict in the East European borderlands, 1970–1992. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Renner, K. (1918). Das selbstbestimmungsrecht der nationen, vol. 1: nation und staat (2nd ed.). Leipzig: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
  20. Shaw, M. (2000). Theory of the global state: globality as unfinished revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Suny, R. G., & Martin, T. (Eds.). (2001). A state of nations: empire and nation making in the age of Lenin and Stalin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Voss, P. (1995). Citizens against the state: political protest in the GDR. In K. Opp, P. Voss, & C. Gern (Eds.), Origins of a spontaneous revolution: East Germany, 1989 (pp. 9–26). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Young, L. (1998). Japan’s total empire: Manchuria and the culture of wartime imperialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations