Abstract
The knowledge of thermophysical properties of heat transfer systems such as their dynamic viscosity is of interest for their efficiency improvement and miniaturization. Hybrid nanofluids are obtained by the suspension of nanoparticles in base fluids. In this study, the effects of temperature (at four levels, from 5 °C to 65 °C) and mass percentage (from 0.005 % to 5 %) were investigated on the dynamic viscosity of two types of graphene nanosheets-copper oxide/ethylene glycol (GNSs-CuO/liquid EG) hybrid nanofluids, i.e., 25 %GNSs-75 %CuO/liquid EG and 75 %GNSs-25 %CuO/liquid EG hybrid nanofluids. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Zeta Potential were analyzed to investigate the shape, size, and stability of the nanoparticles. Results showed the non-Newtonian behavior and very high stability of the studied GNSs-CuO/liquid EG hybrid nanofluids. This behavior was more remarkable at high temperatures, high mass concentrations, and low shear rates. In similar temperatures and mass fractions, GNSs resulted in a higher increase in viscosity and relative viscosity compared to CuO nanoparticles. Furthermore, a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN), as a robust machine learning algorithm, was used to predict the dynamic viscosity of both studied hybrid nanofluids having their mass percentage, temperature, and shear stress as network inputs. The acceptable precision of the ANN model and its generalization were observed through the comparison of experimental and predicted data and the smoothness of the obtained model surfaces, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data and material will be available on reasonable request.
References
R.J.M. Palma, A. Lakhtakia, SPIE (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/3.853406
M. Afrand, A. Karimipour, A.A. Nadooshan, M. Akbari, Physica E (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.07.013
O. Mahian, A. Kianifar, S.Z. Heris, D. Wen, A.Z. Sahin, S. Wongwises, Nano Energy (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.025
S.Z. Heris, M.B. Pour, O. Mahian, S. Wongwises, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.01.071
O. Mahian, A. Kianifar, S.Z. Heris, S. Wongwises, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.07.009
C. Sun, S. Taherifar, O. Malekahmadi, A. Karimipour, A. Karimipour, Q.V. Bach, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05151-9
S. Zhang, L. Lu, T. Wen, C. Dong, Appl. Therm. Eng. 188, 116589 (2021)
M. Huang, H. Borzoei, A. Abdollahi, Z. Li, A. Karimipour, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 122, 105141 (2021)
B.A.F. Dehkordi, A. Abdollahi, ICHMT (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.08.001
R. Chen, Z. Zhao, Z. Su, D. Huang, C. Tang, J. Mol. Liq. 375, 121326 (2023)
A. Mnyusiwalla, A.S. Daar, P.A. Singer, Nanotechnology (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201
S.M. Peyghambarzadeh, S.H. Hashemabadi, S.M. Hoseini, M.S. Jamnani, ICHMT (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.07.001
K.H. Almitani, N.H. Abu-Hamdeh, S. Etedali, A. Abdollahi, A.S. Goldanlou, A. Golmohammadzadeh, J. Mol. Liq. 327, 114883 (2021)
S. Sen Gupta, V. Manoj Siva, S. Krishnan, T.S. Sreeprasad, P.K. Singh, T. Pradeep, S.K. Das, J. Appl. Phys. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3650456
W. Yu, H. Xie, D. Bao, Nanotechnology (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/5/055705
N. Sezer, M.A. Atieh, M. Koç, Powder Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.016
M.A. Akhavan-Behabadi, F. Hekmatipour, S.M. Mirhabibi, B. Sajadi, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.07.008
Y. Xu, Q. Nguyen, O. Malekahmadi, R. Hadi, Z. Jokar, A. Mardani, A. Karimipour, R. Ranjbarzadeh, Z. Li, Q.V. Bach, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6381
X. Li, Y. Chen, S. Mo, L. Jia, X. Shao, Thermochim. Acta (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2014.09.006
A. Arshad, M. Jabbal, Y. Yan, D. Reay, J. Mol. Liq. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.01.153
P.K. Sah, S.S. Kumar, S. Sreedeep, Int. J. Thermophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03163-9
D. Velliadou, K.A. Tasidou, K.D. Antoniadis, M.J. Assael, R.A. Perkins, M.L. Huber, Int. J. Thermophys. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-021-02818-9
M. Sandhya, D. Ramasamy, K. Kadirgama, W.S.W. Harun, R. Saidur, Int. J. Thermophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03162-w
A. Cröll, M. Volz, V. Riabov, A. Ostrogorsky, Int. J. Thermophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03161-x
X. Liang, J. Yang, X. Meng, J. Wu, Int. J. Thermophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03148-0
T. Ishizaki, H. Nagano, S. Tanaka, N. Sakatani, T. Nakamura, T. Okada, R. Fujita, A. Alasli, T. Morita, M. Kikuiri, K. Amano, E. Kagawa, H. Yurimoto, T. Noguchi, R. Okazaki, H. Yabuta, H. Naraoka, K. Sakamoto, S. Tachibana, S. Watanabe, Y. Tsuda, Int. J. Thermophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03158-6
S. Sotiriadou, E. Ntonti, D. Velliadou, K.D. Antoniadis, M.J. Assael, M.L. Huber, Int. J. Thermophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03149-z
B.R. Joudeh, Int. J. Thermophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03155-9
A.K. Mishra, B.B. Lahiri, J. Philip, J. Mol. Liq. 269, 47–63 (2018)
P. Singh, A.K. Ansu, R.K. Sharma, P. Kumari, A. Kumar, R. Kumar, Int. J. Thermophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03146-2
M.H. Fakhar, A. Fakhar, H. Tabatabaei, Int. J. Hydromechatron. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHM.2021.116956
B. Liu, W. Lu, Int. J. Hydromechatron. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHM.2022.127037
S. Wang, J. Zhang, JDMD (2022). https://doi.org/10.37965/jdmd.2022.67
J. Tang, C. Wei, Q. Li, Y. Wang, X. Ding, W. Huang, JDMD (2022). https://doi.org/10.37965/jdmd.2022.30
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JW: Formal analysis; Writing—review & editing; Methodology. AK: Formal analysis; Writing—review & editing; Methodology. SMS: Formal analysis; Writing—review & editing; Methodology. AD: Formal analysis; Writing—review & editing; Methodology. SAB: Formal analysis; Writing—review & editing; Methodology. AA: Formal analysis; Writing—review & editing; Methodology. MI: Formal analysis; Writing—review & editing; Methodology.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Karimipour, A., Sajadi, S.M. et al. Analysis of the Non-Newtonian Behavior and Viscosity of GNSs-CuO/Liquid EG Hybrid Nanofluid: An Experimental and Feed-Forward ANN Study. Int J Thermophys 44, 103 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03196-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03196-0