Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vapor-Phase \(\varvec{(p, \rho , T)}\) Behavior of Difluoromethane (R32) + Trifluoroiodomethane (R13I1), Pentafluoroethane (R125) + R13I1, and R32 + R125 + R13I1 Mixtures: Experimental Measurements Based on the Isochoric Method and Verification with a Generalized Virial Equation of State

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mixing R13I1 with flammable or weakly flammable refrigerants is an approach to reduce both their flammability and global warming potential (GWP); however, thermodynamic property data of mixtures containing R13I1 are currently scarce. In this work, experimental measurements were performed for the \((p, \rho , T)\) behavior in the vapor-phase of R32 + R13I1, R125 + R13I1, and R32 + R125 + R13I1 mixtures. The measurements were made at temperatures from 300 K to 400 K and pressures up to 6.3 MPa, and 44 data points were obtained for the R32 + R13I1 mixture and 25 data points for the R125 + R13I1 mixture. For the ternary mixture, 25 data points were obtained at the composition of R466A (R32:R125:R13I1 = 49:11.5:39.5 \(\mathrm {mass\%}\)). The validity of the experimental data was verified by comparing to the virial equation of state generalized for nonpolar or weakly polar fluids based on the corresponding states principle. The comparison showed that deviations between the experimental and calculated pressures are generally minor and less scattered; this suggests that the \((p, \rho , T)\) data obtained in this work are reasonable in terms of the law of corresponding states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34-2019; Designation and Safety Classification of Refrigerants (2019)

  2. K. Schultz, in 25th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration, August 24–30, Montreal. Canada 2019, 515–522 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18462/iir.icr.2019.0134

  3. S. Kujak, K. Schultz, in 25th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration, August 24–30, Montreal. Canada 2019, 633–640 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18462/iir.icr.2019.0227

  4. Z. Yang, B. Feng, H. Ma, L. Zhang, C. Duan, B. Liu, Y. Zhang, S. Chen, Z. Yang, Int. J. Refrig. 126, 12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A.G. Devecioğlu, V. Oruç, Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 23, 1425 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E.W. Lemmon, I.H. Bell, M.L. Huber, M.O. McLinden. NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 10.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2018). https://doi.org/10.18434/T4JS3Chttps://www.nist.gov/srd/refprop

  7. E.W. Lemmon, R. Span, J. Chem. Eng. Data 60, 3745 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.5b00684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Sakoda, Y. Higashi, in Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Thermophysical Properties (Boulder, CO, USA) (2021)

  9. Y. Kayukawa, C. Kondou, N. Sakoda, K. Kariya, S. Fukuda, JSRAE Thermodynamic Tables JARef Vol. 5: HFOs & HCFOs (Japan Society of Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, 2021)

  10. Y. Higashi, S. Hayasaka, C. Shirai, R. Akasaka, Int. J. Refrig. 52, 100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2014.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Higashi, N. Sakoda, J. Chem. Eng. Data 63, 3818 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Akasaka, Y. Higashi, N. Sakoda, S. Fukuda, E.W. Lemmon, Int. J. Refrig. 119, 457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Akasaka, S. Fukuda, K. Miyane, Y. Higashi, J. Chem. Eng. Data 67, 346 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.1c00890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Higashi, S. Okazaki, Y. Takaishi, M. Uematsu, K. Watanabe, J. Chem. Eng. Data 29, 31 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1021/je00035a012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Tsonopoulos, AIChE J. 20, 263 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690200209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Weber, Int. J. Thermophys. 15, 461 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01563708

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Tillner-Roth, A. Yokozeki, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 26, 1273 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.556002

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Orbey, J. Vera, AIChE J. 29, 107 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690290115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. E.W. Lemmon, R. Jacobsen, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 34, 69 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1797813

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Y.Y. Duan, M.S. Zhu, L. Shi, L.Z. Han, Fluid Phase Equilib. 131, 233 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3812(96)03227-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Tanaka, Netsu Bussei 35, 140 (2021). (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Chueh, J. Prausnitz, AIChE J. 13, 896 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690130516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E.W. Lemmon, R.T. Jacobsen, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 33, 593 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1649997

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was based on results obtained in a project commissioned by New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). The authors appreciate Eric W. Lemmon, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, for his assistance during the documentation of this paper.

Funding

This work is based on results obtained from a project, P18005, commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YH contributed to measuring \((p, \rho , T)\) behavior, including evaluating their experimental uncertainties. YK contributed to the statistical analysis of deviations between experimental data and calculated values from the virial equation of state. RA contributed to writing, reviewing, and editing the whole manuscript, as well as depicting figures and tables.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryo Akasaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akasaka, R., Kayukawa, Y. & Higashi, Y. Vapor-Phase \(\varvec{(p, \rho , T)}\) Behavior of Difluoromethane (R32) + Trifluoroiodomethane (R13I1), Pentafluoroethane (R125) + R13I1, and R32 + R125 + R13I1 Mixtures: Experimental Measurements Based on the Isochoric Method and Verification with a Generalized Virial Equation of State. Int J Thermophys 43, 159 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03080-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03080-3

Keywords

Navigation