Skip to main content
Log in

Determination and Modeling of Optimum Insulation Thickness for Thermal Insulation of Buildings in All City Centers of Turkey

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, research has been carried out in which the optimum insulation thickness for the thermal insulation of buildings in all city centers of Turkey is determined according to life cycle cost analysis. Besides, the total annual net savings of the buildings in all city centers and the payback period of the insulation were concluded according to the determined optimum insulation thickness. In the calculations, it is assumed that natural gas is used for heating the buildings, and electrical energy is used for cooling. Besides, four different insulation materials (XPS, EPS, PUR, and Rock wool) were selected as the most preferred thermal insulation material in Turkey. The methods applied to determine the buildings' optimum insulation thickness are very time-consuming and dependent on many parameters. Twelve different models have been developed for all city centers that determine the optimum insulation thickness depending on the number of Degree-Days of buildings that need only heating, cooling only, heating and cooling to create a practical approach in determining the optimum insulation thickness. The regression analysis models' suitability using MATLAB R2019a program, with R2 values being the main criterion, SEE (Standard error estimate), and RMSE (Root mean square error) values are considered. Accordingly, when the similarity between the developed models and optimal insulation thicknesses obtained from theoretical calculations was examined, it was determined that R2 values were between 0.9683 and 0.9997. It is predicted that this study will provide a practical solution for researchers and designers working on this subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ayear,H :

Difference of annual total heating cost ($·m−2year)

C:

Annual energy cost for unit surface without insulated ($·m−2year)

CA,H :

Total heating cost ($·m−2-year)

CA,C :

Total cooling cost ($·m−2-year)

Cfuel :

Cost of the fuel ($·m−3)

Ce :

Cost of the electricity ($·kW−1)

Cins. :

Cost of the insulant ($·m−2)

COP:

Coefficient of performance

Cy :

Cost of the insulant ($·m−3)

CDD:

Cooling degree-days value (°C-days)

DD:

Degree-days value (°C-days)

HDD:

Heating degree-days value (°C-days)

Eyear,H :

Annual energy need for heating (J·m−2year)

G:

Inflation rate (%)

Hu:

Low heat value of the fuel (J·kg−1, J·m−3)

i:

Interest rate (%)

k:

Thermal conductivity of insulation (W·mK−1)

N:

Lifetime (year)

SPP:

Simple payback period (year)

PWF:

Present worth factor

q:

Annual heat loss (W·m−2)

r:

Actual interest rate

R:

Heat transfer resistance (m2K·W−1)

Rins. :

Thermal resistance of the insulant (m2K·W−1)

Ro :

Outside heat transfer resistance (m2K·W−1)

Rw :

Thermal resistance of wall layers without insulation (m2K·W−1)

Rw,t :

Thermal resistance of non-insulated wall (m2K·W−1)

T:

Temperature (K)

U:

Total heat transfer coefficient (W·m2K−1)

Xopt :

Optimum insulation thickness (m)

References

  1. I. Artola, K. Rademaekers, R. Williams, J. Yearwood, Boosting-Building Renovation: What Potential and Value for Europe? (European Parliament, Brussels, 2016), p. 72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Younsi, L. Zalewski, A. Joulin, S. Lassue, D.R. Rousse, Phase Change Materials: Experimental Measurements of Thermophysical Properties (ICTEA, Abu Dhabi, 2009).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Nazi, Y. Wang, H. Chen, X. Zhang, A.P. Roskilly, Energy Procedia 142, 2295 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ö. Yaman, Ö. Şengül, H. Selçuk, O. Çalıkuş, İ Kara, Ş Erdem, D. Özgür, Turkey Eng. News 487, 62 (2015). (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  5. X. Meng, B. Yan, Y. Gao, J. Wang, W. Zhang, E. Long, Energy Build. 86, 754 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Enshen, Z. Zixuan, M.A. Xiaofei, Build. Environ. 40(4), 537 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ö. Ağra, Ö. Emanet, N.A. Kürekçi, Plumb. Eng. 109, 21 (2009). (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Hasan, Appl. Energy 63(2), 115 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Huang, Y. Zhou, R. Huang, H. Wu, Y. Sun, G. Huang, T. Xu, Sustain. Cities Soc. 52, 101840 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Zhu, V. Huckemann, M.N. Fisch, Procedia Eng. 21, 608 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. U.Y.A. Tettey, A. Dodoo, L. Gustavsson, Energy Procedia 2014(61), 1204 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. Murgul, V. Pukhkal, Procedia Eng. 117, 891 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N.A. Kürekçi, Energy Build. 2016(118), 197 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Sisman, E. Kahya, N. Aras, H. Aras, Energy Policy 35(10), 5151 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M.A. Kallioğlu, U. Ercan, A.S. Avcı, C. Fidan, H. Karakaya, Energy Source Part A (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1651797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ö.A. Dombaycı, Build. Environ. 42(11), 3855 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Bolattürk, Appl. Therm. Eng. 26(11–12), 1301 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Balcı, Marmara Geogr. J. 26, 215 (2012). (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Turkish Standard Institute (TSE), 2008. TS 825 Thermal insulation requirements for buildings

  20. Turkish Standard Institute (TSE), 2013. TS 825 Thermal insulation requirements for buildings

  21. Turkish Standard Institute (TSE), TS EN 771–1+A1, Specification for masonry units—Part 1: Clay masonry

  22. Use of natural gas in city centers (2020). https://www.botas.gov.tr/. Accessed 2 May 2020

  23. Prices of fuels (2020). https://www.igdas.com.tr. Accessed 10 May 2020

  24. O. Büyükalaca, H. Bulut, T. Yılmaz, Appl. Energy 2001(69), 269 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Bulut, O. Büyükalaca, T. Yılmaz, in District heating and cooling degree-days for Turkey, (16th Thermal Science and Technique Congress, 2007, 30 May–2 June, Kayseri, Turkey) (in Turkish)

  26. DD values (2020). https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/gun-derece.aspx. Accessed 8 May 2020

  27. A. Ucar, F. Balo, Renew. Energy 35, 88 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Aktemur, Int. J. Energy Appl. Technol. 5(1), 29 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Inflation and interest rate values (2020). https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/. Accessed 5 May 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Erhan Akan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akan, A.E. Determination and Modeling of Optimum Insulation Thickness for Thermal Insulation of Buildings in All City Centers of Turkey. Int J Thermophys 42, 49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-021-02799-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-021-02799-9

Keywords

Navigation