Abstract
A difference was determined between temperature defined by International Temperature Scale (ITS-90) and thermodynamic temperature measured by relative acoustic gas thermometry at 79.0000 K and at 83.8058 K. Measurement were carried out using misaligned spherical acoustic resonator filled with helium at different pressures. The isotherms were fitted for four different acoustic modes simultaneously assuming the same thermal accommodation coefficient and third acoustic virial coefficient for all modes. Our measurements yield the following differences between the thermodynamic temperature T and ITS-90 temperature \(T_{90}\): \(T-T_{90}=-4.81 \pm 1.02\) mK at 83.9058 K and \(T-T_{90}=-4.47 \pm 0.97\) mK at 79.0000 K.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Resolutions of 26th CGPM, Versailles, France (2018)
R.M. Gavioso, D. Madonna Ripa, P.P.M. Steur, R. Dematteis, D. Imbraguglio, Metrologia 56, 045006 (2019)
C. Gaiser, B. Fellmuth, N. Haft, Metrologia 54, 141 (2017)
R. Underwood, M. de Podesta, G. Sutton, L. Stanger, R. Rusby, P. Harris, P. Morantz, G. Machin, Int. J. Thermophys. 38, 44 (2017)
R. Underwood, M. de Podesta, G. Sutton, L. Stanger, R. Rusby, P. Harris, P. Morantz, G. Machin, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150048 (2016)
D.C. Ripple, G.F. Strouse, M.R. Moldover, Int. J. Thermophys. 28, 1789 (2007)
G.F. Strouse, D.R. Defibaugh, M.R. Moldover, D.C. Ripple, AIP Conf. Proc. 684, 31 (2003)
M.R. Moldover, S.J. Boyes, C.W. Meyer, A.R.H. Goodwin, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 104, 11 (1999)
J. Fischer, M. de Podesta, K.D. Hill, M. Moldover, L. Pitre, R. Rusby, P. Steur, O. Tamura, R. White, L. Wolber, Int. J. Thermophys. 32, 12 (2011)
G. Benedetto, R.M. Gavioso, R. Spagnolo, P. Marcarono, A. Merlone, Metrologia 41, 74–92 (2004)
L. Pitre, M.R. Moldover, W.L. Tew, Metrologia 43, 142 (2006)
C. Gaiser, B. Fellmuth, N. Haft, Int. J. Thermophys. 29, 18 (2008)
M.R. Moldover, R.M. Gavioso, J.B. Mehl, L. Pitre, M. de Podesta, J.T. Zhang, Metrologia 51, R1 (2014)
C. Gaiser, T. Zandt, B. Fellmuth, Metrologia 52, S217 (2015)
P.M.C. Rourke, Int. J. Thermophys. 38, 107 (2017)
D.R. White, R. Galleano, A. Actis, H. Brixy, M. De Groot, J. Dubbeldam, A.L. Reesink, F. Edler, H. Sakurai, R.L. Shepard, Metrologia 33, 325 (1996)
R.M. Gavioso, D. Madonna Ripa, P.P.M. Steur, C. Gaiser, D. Truong, C. Guianvarc’h, P. Tarizzo, F.M. Stuart, R. Dematteis, Metrologia 52, S274 (2015)
M. de Podesta, R. Underwood, G. Sutton, P. Morantz, P. Harris, D.F. Mark, F.M. Stuart, G. Vargha, G. Machin, Metrologia 50, 354 (2013)
L. Pitre, L. Risegari, F. Sparasci, M.D. Plimmer, M.E. Himbert, P.A. Giuliano Albo, Metrologia 52, S263 (2015)
L. Pitre, F. Sparasci, L. Risegari, C. Guianvarc’h, C. Martin, M.E. Himbert, M.D. Plimmer, A. Allard, B. Marty, P.A. GiulianoAlbo, Metrologia 54, 856 (2017)
V.G. Kytin, G.A. Kytin, Meas. Tech. 59, 62 (2016)
H. Preston-Thomas, Metrologia 27, 3 (1990)
K.D. Hill, A.G. Steele, Y.A. Dedikov, V.T. Shkraba, Metrologia 42, 03001 (2005)
B. Mehl, M.R. Moldover, Phys. Rev. A 34, 3341 (1986)
J.B. Mehl, Metrologia 46, 554 (2009)
J.B. Mehl, C. R. Physique 10, 859 (2009)
ISO/IEC GUIDE 98-3:2008(E) Published in Switzerland (2008)
Acknowledgements
Authors are grateful to A.S. Doinikov for fruitful discussions and important remarks concerning uncertainty budget and presentation of results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Calculation of Type A Uncertainties of T Measurements
Appendix: Calculation of Type A Uncertainties of T Measurements
Contributions to type A uncertainty of T measurement due to noise of microwave and acoustic signal were calculated based on the T determination procedure. The following expressions were used:
where \(N_m =400\) is the amount of points in the frequency dependence of microwave transmission coefficient.
where \(N_a\) = 30 is the amount of point in the frequency dependence of acoustic signal. Derivatives of resonance frequencies were calculated using following expressions:
Fitting procedure minimizes sum of squared deviations Q of experimental points from fitting function \(G(P, x_j)\). Thus, derivatives of Q over fitting parameters \(p_k\) are equal to zero for best values of fitting parameters. Therefore,
where \(P=(p_1, p_2,\ldots , p_{N_p})\) is the array of fitting parameters, \(d_j\) the weight, and N the amount of point in fitting dependence.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kytin, V.G., Kytin, G.A., Ghavalyan, M.Y. et al. Deviation of Temperature Determined by ITS-90 Temperature Scale from Thermodynamic Temperature Measured by Acoustic Gas Thermometry at 79.0000 K and at 83.8058 K. Int J Thermophys 41, 88 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02663-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02663-2