Abstract
The reduction of device components is of a major interest for the conception of low-cost devices with a simple design. Generally, the boxes method measures the effective thermal conductivity of relatively large-sized samples due to its industrial purposes. However, to determine the thermal conductivity of small samples, additional sensors are required. In this work, a new experimental procedure is developed to characterize the thermal conductivity of small samples without any additional sensor. A detailed uncertainty analysis in the thermal conductivity measurements is conducted. The improvement of the instrument uncertainty was also considered. Three different scenarios were examined, from ideal to worst-case, in order to assess the performance of the proposed methodology. The values of the measured thermal conductivity were compared with those obtained by a reference method (hot disk). The comparison shows a good agreement and proves the effectiveness of the used technique. The overall study of the propagation of measurement uncertainties shows that the instrument’s uncertainty was found to be less than 6.1 %.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- C:
-
Thermal loss coefficient through the box (W·m−2·K−1)
- es :
-
Thickness of the small sample (m)
- eXPS :
-
Thickness of the insulating frame (m)
- Pi :
-
ith permutation [one]
- R:
-
Resistance of the heater element (Ω)
- Ss :
-
Surface of the small sample (m2)
- SXPS :
-
Surface of the insulating frame (m2)
- Tbox_upper :
-
Temperature of the box (°C)
- Tbox_lower :
-
Temperature of the isothermal capacity (°C)
- Tlower :
-
Temperature of the lower face (°C)
- Troom :
-
Temperature of the room (°C)
- Tupper :
-
Temperature of the higher face (°C)
- U:
-
Voltage (V)
- Uxi :
-
Relative uncertainty in the xi variable (%)
- UMFxi :
-
Uncertainty magnification factor of the xi variable
- ΔTloss :
-
Box/room temperature difference (°C)
- ΔTs :
-
Higher/lower temperature difference of the small sample (°C)
- ΔTXPS :
-
Higher/lower temperature difference of the insulating frame (°C)
- \(\delta_{xi}\) :
-
Absolute uncertainty in the xi variable
- \(\uplambda\) :
-
Thermal conductivity (W·m−1·K−1)
- \(\emptyset_{loss}\) :
-
Heat loss through the box (W)
- \(\emptyset_{in}\) :
-
Heat flow produced by the heating element (W)
- \(\emptyset_{sample}\) :
-
Heat flow through the small sample (W)
- \(\emptyset_{XPS}\) :
-
Heat flow through the insulating frame (W)
- EI702:
-
Boxes method cell
- DRE:
-
Data reduction equation
References
J.C. Maréchal, Mater. Constr. 7, 61 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF024826
S.O.G. Osséni, C. Ahouannou, E.A. Sanya, Y. Jannot, Int. J. Thermophys. 38, 81 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-017-2217-7
X. Guo, T. Zhang, J. Clean. Prod. 252, 119759 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119759
R. Alyousef, O. Benjeddou, C. Soussi, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8160461
R. Coquard, E. Coment, G. Flasquin, D. Baillis, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 65, 242 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.10.008
H. Ezbakhe, S. Boussaid, A.E. Bakkouri, T. Ajzoul, A.E. Bouardi, in World Renewable Energy Congress VI, ed. by A.A.M. Sayigh (Elsevier, Brighton, 2000), p. 1788
P. Meukam, Y. Jannot, A. Noumowe, T.C. Kofane, Constr. Build. Mater. 18, 437 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.03.010
A. Khabbazi, M. Garoum, O. Terahmina, J. Adv. Model. Simul. A 74, 73 (2005)
P.S. Ngohe-Ekam, P. Meukam, G. Menguy, P. Girard, Constr. Build. Mater. 20, 929 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.017
H. Lakrafli, S. Tahiri, A. Albizane, M.E.E. Otmani, J. Constr. Build. Mater. 30, 590 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.041
H. Lakrafli, S. Tahiri, A. Albizane, M. Bouhria, M.E.E. Otmani, J. Constr. Build. Mater. 48, 566 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.048
D. Taoukil, F. Sick, A. Mimet, H. Ezbakhe, T. Ajzoul, J. Constr. Build. Mater. 48, 104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.067
A. Adili, M. Lachheb, A. Brayek, A. Guizani, S.B. Nasrallah, J. Energy Build. 118, 133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.039
D. Belkharchouche, A. Chaker, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 7119 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.160
D. Belkharchouche, A. Chaker, Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 6, 15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-017-0099-z
M. Boumhaout, L. Boukhattem, H. Hamdi, B. Benhamou, F.A. Nouh, J. Constr. Build. Mater. 135, 241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.217
M. Lamrani, N. Laaroussi, A. Khabbazi, M. Khalfaoui, M. Garoum, A. Feiz, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 7, 294 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2017.09.006
A. Lachheb, A. Allouhi, M. El Marhoune, R. Saadani, T. Kousksou, A. Jamil, M. Rahmoune, O. Oussouaddia, J. Clean Prod. 209, 1411 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.140
M. Ouakarrouch, N. Laaroussi, M. Garoum, J. Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain. 5, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/rees/2019011
Z. Saghrouni, D. Baillis, N. Naouar, N. Blal, A. Jemni, J. Appl. Sci. 9, 981 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050981
O. Benjeddou, C. Soussi, M. Benali, R. Alyousef, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04362-4
A. Moutarda, J. Leveau, Bulletin technique EI700, Deltalab. (1986)
W.J. Parker, R.J. Jenkins, C.P. Butler, G.L. Abbot, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1679 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1728417
N. Sotehi, Caractéristiques Thermiques des Parois des Bâtiments et Amélioration de L’isolation, in Ph.D Thesis, Université Mentouri, Constantine. (2010)
M. Bouhhaout, L. Boukhattem, H. Hamdi, B. Benhamou, F.A. Nouh, in The 3d Congress Moroccan Association of Thermal Sciences, vol. 700 (2014), p. 21
Y.E. Rhaffari, M. Boukalouch, A. Khabbazi, A. Samaouali, Y. Geraud, in Matériaux (2010), pp. 18–22
L. Boukhattem, R. Mir, M. Kourchi, A. Bendou, in Rev. Inl. Heliotech. Energy-Environment, vol. 36, (2007), p. 03
J.C. Jaeger, H.S. Carslaw, Conduction of heat in solids, 2nd edn. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1959), p. 45
I. Langmuir, E.Q. Adams, F.S. Meikle, Trans. Am. Electrochem. Soc. 24, 53 (1913)
European Standard EN ISO 8990 (1996)
K.P. Rajan, S.P. Thomas, A. Gopanna, M. Chavali, In Nano-and Microscale Drug Delivery Systems (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017), pp. 299–319
Q. Ai, Z.W. Hu, M. Liu, X.L. Xia, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 128, 289 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5849-0
Y. He, Thermochim. Acta 436, 122 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2005.06.026
P. Mosquera, I. Cañas, J. Cid-Falceto, F. Marcos, J. Heat Transf. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025560
L. Kirkup, R.B. Frenkel, An Introduction to Uncertainty in Measurement using the GUM (Guide to the Uncertainty in Measurement) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)
H.W. Coleman, W.G. Steele, Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, 4th edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2018)
V.R. Meyer, J. Chromatogr. A 1158, 15 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.02.082
Bibliothèque BINAYATE perspective, National Agency for Energy Efficiency, Morocco (2014)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the “National Center for Scientific and Technical Research” for funding this work through the PPR project “Promotion of solar energy and energy efficiency in the oriental region of Morocco”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Charai, M., Sghiouri, H., Mezrhab, A. et al. New Methodology for Measuring the Thermal Conductivity of Small Samples Using the Boxes Method with Reduced Sensors. Int J Thermophys 41, 72 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02649-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02649-0