Abstract
It is found that the comparison presented by Anand et al. between the theories of high-temperature interatomic separation and bulk modulus due to Anderson and Liu is useful for readers. But several ideas in the study of Anand et al. are not adequate. A detailed analysis is presented along with the comments on the several concepts presented by Anand et al.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Q. Liu, Int. J. Thermophys. 37, 65 (2016)
O.L. Anderson, Equations of State of Solids for Geophysics and Ceramic Science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995)
O.L. Anderson, H. Oda, D.G. Issak, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1987 (1992)
O.L. Anderson, D.G. Issak, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 54, 221 (1993)
Q. Liu, Acta Phys. Pol. A 119, 829 (2011)
O.L. Anderson, D.G. Issak, H. Oda, Rev. Geophys. 30, 57 (1992)
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by the Key Research Foundation of Education Ministry of Anhui Province under Grants No. KJ2018A0028 and the Doctoral Scientific Research Startup Fund of Anhui University (J01001319-J10113190082).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, YX., Liu, Q. Response to the Remark on Temperature Dependence of Interatomic Separation and Bulk Modulus for Alkali Halides. Int J Thermophys 40, 34 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-019-2492-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-019-2492-6