Bilateral Comparison of Mercury and Gallium Fixed-Point Cells Using Standard Platinum Resistance Thermometer
- 115 Downloads
The objective of project EURAMET 1127 (Bilateral comparison of triple point of mercury and melting point of gallium) in the field of thermometry is to compare realization of a triple point of mercury (−38.8344 °C) and melting point of gallium (29.7646 °C) between the Slovenian national laboratory MIRS/UL-FE/LMK and the Croatian national laboratory HMI/FSB-LPM using a long-stem 25 Ω standard platinum resistance thermometer (SPRT). MIRS/UL/FE-LMK participated in a number of intercomparisons on the level of EURAMET. On the other hand, the HMI/LPM-FSB laboratory recently acquired new fixed-point cells which had to be evaluated in the process of intercomparisons. A quartz-sheathed SPRT has been selected and calibrated at HMI/LPM-FSB at the triple point of mercury, the melting point of gallium, and the water triple point. A second set of measurements was made at MIRS/UL/FE-LMK. After its return, the SPRT was again recalibrated at HMI/LPM-FSB. In the comparison, the W value of the SPRT has been used. Results of the bilateral intercomparison confirmed that the new gallium cell of the HMI/LPM-FSB has a value that is within uncertainty limits of both laboratories that participated in the exercise, while the mercury cell experienced problems. After further research, a small leakage in the mercury fixed-point cell has been found.
KeywordsInterlaboratory comparison Melting point of gallium Standard platinum resistance thermometer (SPRT) Triple point of mercury W value
- 1.Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes: CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) Meeting. CIPM, Paris, France (1999)Google Scholar
- 2.E. Renaot, Y. Hermier, M.H. Valin, G. Bonnier, F. Adunka, A. Van Der Linden, M. Dobre, M. Šmíd, A. Bronnum, T. Weckstrom, E. Tegeler, U. Noatsch, M. Anagnostou, E. Turzo-Andras, S. Nemeth, M. White, P. Marcarino, P. Steur, A. Pauzha, V. Augevicius, M. de Groot, J. Nielsen, F. Helgesen, W. Roszkowski, E. Grudniewicz, R. Kuna, E. Filipe, I. Lobo, S. Gaita, V. Chimenti, J. Ivarsson, S. Duris, J. Ranostaj, J. Bojkovski, A. Steiner, S. Ugur, J. Gray, S. Bruce, R. Rusby, D. Head, Int. J. Thermophys. 29, 991 (2008)Google Scholar
- 3.J. Bojkovski, J. Drnovšek, I. Pušnik, Acceptable Traceability of a Distributed National Metrological System, in Proceedings of IMTC’98 (St. Paul, MN, 1998), pp. 1260–1262Google Scholar
- 4.J. Bojkovski, I. Pušnik, V. Batagelj, J. Drnovšek, Realization of the Temperature Scale in Slovenia, in Proceedings of TEMPMEKO 2001, 8th International Symposium on Temperature and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science, ed. by B. Fellmuth, J. Seidel, G. Scholz (VDE Verlag, Berlin, 2002), pp. 559–563Google Scholar