Social Correlates of and Reasons for Primate Meat Consumption in Central Amazonia

Lemos, Lísley Pereira; Loureiro, Luiz Francisco; Morcatty, Thais Queiroz; Fa, Julia E.; de Vasconcelos Neto, Carlos Frederico Alves; de Souza Jesus, Anamélia; da Silva, Viviane Costa; de Oliveira Ramalho, Miguell Lemos; de Matos Mendes, André; Valsecchi, João; El Bizri, Hani Rocha

doi:10.1007/s10764-021-00214-6

Published: 30 May 2021

Social Correlates of and Reasons for Primate Meat Consumption in Central Amazonia

International Journal of Primatology volume 42, pages 499–521 (2021)Cite this article

432 Accesses
4 Citations
6 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

Traditionally, humans have consumed nonhuman primates in many places, including throughout the Amazon region. However, primate consumption rates are changing with rising urbanization and market access. We characterize primate consumption in central Amazonia using 192 qualitative interviews with inhabitants in three rural villages and in the city of Tefé. We used a generalized linear model to investigate how individual consumer characteristics, such as age and gender, and livelihoods affected primate consumption. We also used principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and word clouds and network text analyses, to describe reasons people gave for eating or avoiding primates. Our results show that men were more likely to say that they eat primates than women, and that the probability that a person said that they eat primates correlated positively with the percentage of their life lived in rural areas. People gave sentiment and ethical reasons not to eat primates. Custom influenced whether people said they eat primates both positively and negatively, while taste positively influenced whether people said they eat primates. A preference for other wild meats in rural areas, and for domestic meats in cities negatively influenced whether people said they eat primates. People also cited the perceptions that primates have a human-like appearance and that primate meat is unhealthy as reasons not to eat primates. People in urban areas also cited conservation attitudes as reasons for not eating primates. Our findings provide an understanding of factors influencing primate consumption in our study area and will be useful for designing tailored conservation initiatives by reducing hunting pressure on primates in rural settings and increasing the effectiveness of outreach campaigns in urban centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

Alvard, M. S. (1993). Testing the ecologically noble savage hypothesis: Interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology, 21(4), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891140.
Article Google Scholar
Alves, R. R. N., & Souto, W. M. S. (2015). Ethnozoology: A brief introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 4. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2015-1-4.1-1-13.
Alves, R. R. N., Souto, W. M. S., & Barboza, R. R. D. (2010). Primates in traditional folk medicine: A world overview. Mammal Review, 40, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00158.x.
Article Google Scholar
Amazonas. Plano de Gestão da Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Amanã. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente (SEMA) do Estado do Amazonas, Sociedade Civil Mamirauá. (2020). http://meioambiente.am.gov.br/plano-de-gestao/ (accessed April 22, 2020).
Ayres, J. M. C. (1986). Uakaris and Amazonian flooded forest. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Bail, C. A. (2016). Combining natural language processing and network analysis to examine how advocacy organizations stimulate conversation on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 113(42), 11823–11828. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607151113.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bennett, E. L. (2002). Is there a link between wild meat and food security? Conservation Biology, 16(3), 590–592 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3061205.
Article Google Scholar
Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
Google Scholar
Bodmer, R. E. (1995a). Priorities for the conservation of mammals in the Peruvian Amazon. Oryx, 29(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300020834.
Article Google Scholar
Bodmer, R. E. (1995b). Managing Amazonian wildlife: Biological correlates of game choice by detribalized hunters. Ecological Applications, 5, 872–877. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269338.
Article Google Scholar
Bodmer, R. E., Eisenberg, J. F., & Redford, K. H. (1997). Hunting and the Likelihood of Extinction of Amazonian Mammals: Caza y Probabilidad de Extinción de Mamiferos Amazónicos. Conservation Biology, 11, 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96022.x.
Article Google Scholar
Bodmer, R. E., & Lozano, E. P. (2001). Rural development and sustainable wildlife use in Peru. Conservation Biology, 15, 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041163.x.
Article Google Scholar
Brasil (1967). Lei No. 5.197 de 03 de janeiro de 1967. Dispõe sobre a proteção à fauna e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L5197.htm (accessed March 25, 2020).
Brasil. (1998). Lei No. 9.605 de 12 de fevereiro de 1998. Dispõe sobre as sanções penais e administrativas derivadas de condutas e atividades lesivas ao meio ambiente, e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9605.htm (accessed March 25, 2020).
Browder, J. O., & Godfrey, B. J. (1990). Frontier urbanization in the Brazilian Amazon: A theoretical framework for urban transition. Yearbook/CLAG, 16, 56–66.
Google Scholar
Cawthorn, D. M., & Hoffman, L. C. (2016). Controversial cuisine: A global account of the demand, supply and acceptance of “unconventional” and “exotic” meats. Meat Science, 120, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.017.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Chausson, A. M., Rowcliffe, J. M., Escouflaire, L., Wieland, M., & Wright, J. H. (2019). Understanding the sociocultural drivers of urban bushmeat consumption for behavior change interventions in Pointe Noire, Republic of Congo. Human Ecology, 47(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-0061-z.
Article Google Scholar
Chaves, W. A., Monroe, M. C., & Sieving, K. E. (2019). Wild meat trade and consumption in the central Amazon, Brazil. Human Ecology, 47, 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00107-6.
Article Google Scholar
Chaves, W. A., Valle, D. R., Monroe, M. C., Wilkie, D. S., Sieving, K. E., & Sadowsky, B. (2018). Changing wild meat consumption: An experiment in the central Amazon, Brazil. Conservation Letters, 11, e12391. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12391.
Article Google Scholar
Chaves, W. A., Valle, D., Tavares, A. S., Morcatty, T. Q., & Wilcove, D. S. (2020). Impacts of rural to urban migration, urbanization, and generational change on consumption of wild animals in the Amazon. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13663.
Chaves, W. A., Wilkie, D. S., Monroe, M. C., & Sieving, K. E. (2017). Market access and wild meat consumption in the central Amazon, Brazil. Biological Conservation, 212, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.013.
Article Google Scholar
Colding, C., & Folke, C. (2001). Social taboos: “Invisible” systems of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecological Applications, 11(2), 584–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/3060911.
Article Google Scholar
Cormier, L. (2006). A preliminary review of neotropical primates in the subsistence and symbolism of indigenous lowland South American peoples. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2(1), 14–32.
Google Scholar
de Thoisy, B., Richard-Hansen, C., & Peres, C. A. (2009). Impacts of subsistence game hunting on Amazonian primates. In P. A. Garber, A. Estrada, J. C. Bicca-Marques, E. W. Heymann, & K. B. Strier (Eds.), South American primates (pp. 389–412). Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
El Bizri, H. R., Morcatty, T. Q., Ferreira, J. C., Mayor, P., Vasconcelos-Neto, C. F. A., et al (2020b). Social and biological correlates of wild meat consumption and trade by rural communities on the Jutaí River basin, central Amazonia. Journal of Ethnobiology, 40(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-40.2.183.
Article Google Scholar
El Bizri, H. R., Morcatty, T. Q., Valsecchi, J., Mayor, P., Ribeiro, J. E. S., et al (2020a). Urban wild meat consumption and trade in central Amazonia. Conservation Biology, 34, 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13420.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Estrada, A. (2013). Socioeconomic contexts of primate conservation: Population, poverty, global economic demands, and sustainable land use. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22080.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Rylands, A. B., Roos, C., Fernandez-Duque, E., et al (2017). Impeding extinction crisis of the world's primates: Why primates matter? Science Advances, 3(1), e1600946. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600946.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fa, J. E., & Brown, D. (2009). Impacts of hunting on mammals in African tropical moist forests: A review and synthesis. Mammal Review, 39(4), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2009.00149.x.
Article Google Scholar
Fa, J. E., Currie, D., & Meeuwig, J. (2003). Bushmeat and food security in the Congo Basin: Linkages between wildlife and people's future. Environmental Conservation, 30(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892903000067.
Article Google Scholar
Fa, J. E., Olivero, J., Farfán, M. Á., Márquez, A. L., Duarte, J., et al (2015). Correlates of bushmeat in markets and depletion of wildlife. Conservation Biology, 29, 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12441.
Fa, J. E., & Peres, C. A. (2001). Game vertebrate extraction in African and Neotropical forests: An intercontinental comparison. In J. D. Reynolds, G. M. Mace, K. H. Redford, & J. G. Robinson (Eds.), Conservation of exploited species (pp. 203–241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Fa, J. E., Peres, C. A., & Meeuwig, J. (2002). Bushmeat exploitation in Tropical forests: An intercontinental comparison. Conservation Biology, 16, 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00275.x.
Article Google Scholar
Friant, S., Ayambem, W. A., Alobi, A. O., Ifebueme, N. M., Otukpa, O. M., et al (2020). Eating bushmeat improves food security in a biodiversity and infectious disease “hotspot.”. Ecohealth, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-020-01473-0.
Fuentes, A. (2012). Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human-primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145808.
Article Google Scholar
Fuentes, A., Cortez, A. D., & Peterson, J. V. (2016). Ethnoprimatology and conservation: Applying insights and developing practice. In M. Waller (Ed.), Ethnoprimatology. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (pp. 1–19). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30469-4_1.
Chapter Google Scholar
Garber, P. (2019). Distinguished primatologist address. Moving from advocacy to activism: Changing views of primate field research and conservation over the past 40 years. American Journal of Primatology, 81, e23052. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23052.
Harrison, X. A., Donaldson, L., Correa-Cano, M. E., Evans, J., Fisher, D. N., et al (2018). A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ, 6, e4794.
Article Google Scholar
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). Censo demográfico 1940–2010. Até 1970 dados extraídos de: Estatísticas do século XX. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro. (2010). https://seriesestatisticas.ibge.gov.br/series.aspx?no=10&op=0&vcodigo=POP122&t=taxa-urbanizacao (accessed March 25, 2020).
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). Category VI: Protected area with sustainable use of natural resources. (2020). https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about/protected-areas-categories/category-vi-protected-area-sustainable-use-natural-resources (accessed March 25, 2020).
Knoop, S. B., Morcatty, T. Q., El Bizri, H. R., & Cheyne, S. M. (2020). Age, religion, and taboos influence subsistence hunting by indigenous people of the lower Madeira River, Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Ethnobiology, 40(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-40.2.131.
Article Google Scholar
Koster, J. M., Hodgen, J. J., Venegas, M. D., & Copeland, T. J. (2010). Is meat flavor a factor in hunters’ prey choice decisions? Human Nature, 21(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9093-1.
Article Google Scholar
Levi, T., Lu, F., Yu, D. W., & Mangel, M. (2011). The behaviour and diet breadth of central-place foragers: An application to human hunters and Neotropical game management. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 13(2), 171–185.
Google Scholar
Lowassa, A., Tadie, D., & Fischer, A. (2012). On the role of women in bushmeat hunting: Insights from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 622–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.06.002.
Article Google Scholar
Luiselli, L., Hema, E. M., Segniagneto, G. H., Ouattara, V., Eniang, E. A., et al (2019). Understanding the influence of non-wealth factors in determining bushmeat consumption: Results from four West African countries. Acta Oecologica, 94, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2017.10.002.
Article Google Scholar
Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L., Don Carlos, A. W., Sullivan, L., Bright, A. D., et al (2020). The changing sociocultural context of wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology, 34(6), 1549–1559. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13493.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mayor, P., El Bizri, H., Bodmer, R. E., & Bowler, M. (2017). Assessment of mammal reproduction for hunting sustainability through community-based sampling of species in the wild. Conservation Biology, 31(4), 912–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12870.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Meijaard, E., Buchori, D., Hadiprakarsa, Y., Utami-Atmoko, S. S., Nurcahyo, A., et al (2011). Quantifying killing of orangutans and human-oranguran conflict in Kalimantan, Indonesia. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e27491. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027491.
CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E. J., Bennet, E. L., & the SCB 2002 Annual Meeting Wild Meat Group (2003). Wild meat: The bigger picture. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00123-X.
Article Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R. A. (1987). Effects of hunting on rain forest primates. In C. W. Marsh & R. A. Mittermeier (Eds.), Primate conservation in the tropical rain forest (pp. 109–146). New York: Alan R. Liss.
Google Scholar
Morsello, C., Yagüe, B., Beltreschi, L., van Vliet, N., Adams, C., et al (2015). Cultural attitudes are stronger predictors of bushmeat consumption and preference than economic factors among urban Amazonians from Brazil and Colombia. Ecology and Society, 20(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07771-200421.
Article Google Scholar
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & van Vliet, N. (2011). Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basin. International Forestry Review, 13(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554811798293872.
Article Google Scholar
Nekaris, K. A. I., & Bergin, D. (2017). Primate trade (Asia). In A. Fuentes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology (pp. 1–8). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006.
Article Google Scholar
Padoch, C., Brondizio, E., Costa, S., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Sears, R. R., & Siqueira, A. (2008). Urban forest and rural cities: Multi-sited households, consumption patterns, and forest resources in Amazonia. Ecology and Society, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02526-130202.
Parry, L., Barlow, J., & Pereira, H. (2014). Wildlife harvest and consumption in Amazonia’s urbanized wilderness. Conservation Letters, 7(6), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12151.
Article Google Scholar
Peluso, D. M. (2015). Circulating between rural and urban communities: Multisited dwellings in Amazonian frontiers. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 20(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12134.
Article Google Scholar
Peres, C. A. (1997). Effects of habitat quality and hunting pressure on arboreal folivore densities in Neotropical forests: A case study of howler monkeys (Alouatta spp.). Folia Primatologica, 68, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1159/000157247.
Article Google Scholar
Peres, C. A. (2000). Effects of subsistence hunting on vertebrate community structure in Amazonian forests. Conservation Biology, 14(1), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98485.x.
Article Google Scholar
Peres, C. A., Emilio, T., Schietti, J., Desmoulière, S. J. M., & Levi, T. (2016). Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests. PNAS, 113(4), 892–897. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516525113.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Pi, J. S., & Groves, C. (1972). The importance of higher primates in the diet of the fang of Rio Muni. Man, 7(2), 239–243.
Article Google Scholar
Piperata, B. A., Ivanova, S. A., Da-Gloria, P., Veiga, G., Polsky, A., et al (2011). Nutritional in transition: Dietary patterns of rural Amazonian woman during a period of economic change. American Journal of Human Biology, 23(4), 458469. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.21147.
Article Google Scholar
Prado, H. M., da Silva, R. C., Schlindwein, M. N., & Sereni, R. S. (2020). Ethnography, ethnobiology and natural history: Narratives on hunting and ecology of mammals among quilombolas from southeast Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 16, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-0359-3.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Puertas, P., & Bodmer, R. E. (1993). Conservation of a high diversity primate assemblage. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051959.
Article Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2017). https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed March 10, 2020).
Renoux, F., & de Thoisy, B. (2016). Hunting management: The need to adjust predictive models to field observations. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 5. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2016-6-5.1-1-13.
Robinson, C. J., Daspit, L. L., & Remis, M. J. (2016). Monkeys on the menu? Reconciling patterns of primate hunting and consumption in a central African village. In M. Waller (Ed.), Ethnoprimatology. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (pp. 47–61). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30469-4_3.
Chapter Google Scholar
Rose, A. L. (2002). Conservation must pursue human-nature biosynergy in the era of social chaos and bushmeat commerce. In A. Fuentes & L. D. Wolfe (Eds.), Primates face to face: The conservation implications of human-nonhuman primate interconnections (pp. 208–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter Google Scholar
Rossato, R. S., Azevedo, R. B., Fialho, M. S., Vidal, M. D., & Lopes, G. P. (2017). Primatas da Floresta Nacional de Tefé, Amazônia Central. Biodiversidade Brasileira, 7(2), 15–22.
Google Scholar
Schenck, M., Effa, E. N., Starkey, M. W., Abernethy, K., Telfer, P., et al (2006). Why people eat bushmeat: results from two-choice, taste test in Gabon, central Africa. Human Ecology, 34(3), 433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9025-1.
Article Google Scholar
Stafford, C. A., Preziosi, R. F., & Sellers, W. I. (2017). A pan-neotropical analysis of hunting preferences. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 1877–1897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1334-8.
CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Torres, P. C., Morsello, C., Parry, L., & Barlow, J. (2017). Landscape correlates of bushmeat consumption and hunting in a post-frontier Amazon region. Environmental Conservation, 45(4), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000510.
Article Google Scholar
van Vliet, N. (2018). “Bushmeat crisis” and “cultural imperialism” in wildlife management? Taking value orientations into account for a more sustainable and culturally acceptable wildmeat sector. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00112.
Article Google Scholar
van Vliet, N., Cruz, D., Quiceno-Mesa, M., Aquino, L. N., Moreno, J., et al (2015b). Ride, shoot, and call: wildlife use among contemporary urban hunters in Três Fronteiras, Brazilian Amazon. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 8 https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07506-200308.
Article Google Scholar
van Vliet, N., Moreno, J., Gomez, J., Zhou, W., Fa, J., et al (2017). Bushmeat and human health: Assessing the evidence in tropical and sub-tropical forests. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 6. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2017-04-6.3-1-45.
van Vliet, N., Quiceno-Mesa, M. P., Cruz-Antia, D., Tellez, L., Martins, C., et al (2015a). From fish and bushmeat to chicken nuggets: The nutrition transition in a continuum from rural to urban settings in the Colombian Amazon region. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 4, 6. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2015-7-4.6-1-12.
Welbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., & Benoit, K. (2017). Text analysis in R. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(4), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1387238.
Article Google Scholar
Wilkie, D. S., & Godoy, R. A. (2001). Income and price elasticities of bushmeat demand in lowland Amerindian societies. Conservation Biology, 15, 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003761.x.
Article Google Scholar
Woman in Conservation. Joint declaration of Woman in Conservation. III Latin American and Caribbean Congress of Protected Areas, Lima. (2019). https://mujeresenconservacion.home.blog/ (accessed March 25, 2020).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The collaboration of all interviewees was essential for the production of this study. The authors also thank M. C. Gaona for the comments on the manuscript, C. L. B. Franco for the map, and J. B. O. Freitas for the communication advisory. We are grateful to one anonymous reviewer and to Prof. Joanna M. Setchell for their comments on the original manuscript. L. P. Lemos thanks the International Primatological Society through its Pre-Congress Training Program and the Brazilian Primatological Society through its Brazilian Primates’ Course. This work was supported by the Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Grant Nos. 301059/2020-9, 300303/2020-3, 302143/2020-3, 201475/2017-0; 300999/2020-8, 146954/2019-0, 146823/2019-2), Ministério de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações (MCTIC), and the Grant Agreement for Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (Grant No. 5344) of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. A. de Souza Jesus was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Pará (FAPESPA) (Grant No. 007/2017-FAPESPA/UFRA). V. Costa da Silva was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM) (Grant No. 062.01287/2017). T. Q. Morcatty was supported by the Funds for Women Graduates from the British Federation of Women Graduates, the WCS Graduate Scholarship Program, a program of the Wildlife Conservation Society and the Christensen Conservation Leaders Scholarship, and by the Wildlife Conservation Network Scholarship Program through the Sidney Byers Scholarship award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Grupo de Pesquisa em Ecologia de Vertebrados Terrestres, Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (IDSM), Tefé, Amazonas, Brasil
Lísley Pereira Lemos, Carlos Frederico Alves de Vasconcelos Neto, Anamélia de Souza Jesus, Miguell Lemos de Oliveira Ramalho, André de Matos Mendes, João Valsecchi & Hani Rocha El Bizri
Grupo de Pesquisa em Biologia e Conservação de Primatas, Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (IDSM), Tefé, Amazonas, Brasil
Lísley Pereira Lemos & Anamélia de Souza Jesus
Rede de Pesquisa para Estudos sobre Diversidade, Conservação e Uso da Fauna na Amazônia (RedeFauna), Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil
Lísley Pereira Lemos, Thais Queiroz Morcatty, Carlos Frederico Alves de Vasconcelos Neto, Anamélia de Souza Jesus, João Valsecchi & Hani Rocha El Bizri
Grupo de Pesquisa em Territorialidades e Governança Socioambiental na Amazônia, Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (IDSM), Tefé, Amazonas, Brasil
Luiz Francisco Loureiro
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
Thais Queiroz Morcatty & Hani Rocha El Bizri
Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
Julia E. Fa
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Jalan Cifor Rawajaha, Situ Gede, Bogor Barat, Kota Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Julia E. Fa
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Produção Animal na Amazônia, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA), Belém, Pará, Brasil
Anamélia de Souza Jesus
Laboratório de Ecologia Comportamental de Peixes, Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (IDSM), Tefé, Amazonas, Brasil
Viviane Costa da Silva
Centro de Estudos Superiores de Tefé, Universidade Estadual do Amazonas (CEST/UEA), Tefé, Amazonas, Brasil
Miguell Lemos de Oliveira Ramalho & André de Matos Mendes
Comunidad de Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en la Amazonía y en Latinoamérica (ComFauna), Iquitos, Loreto, Peru
João Valsecchi & Hani Rocha El Bizri

Authors

Lísley Pereira Lemos
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Luiz Francisco Loureiro
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Thais Queiroz Morcatty
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Julia E. Fa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Carlos Frederico Alves de Vasconcelos Neto
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anamélia de Souza Jesus
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Viviane Costa da Silva
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Miguell Lemos de Oliveira Ramalho
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
André de Matos Mendes
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
João Valsecchi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hani Rocha El Bizri
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LPL, LFL, CFAV, ASJ, VCS, JV, and HREB designed the study. LPL, LFL, CFAV, ASJ, VCS, MLOR, and AMM collected the data. LPL, LFL, TQM, CFAV, and HREB conducted data analysis. LPL, LFL, TQM, JEF, and HREB led the manuscript writing. All authors contributed to results interpretation and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lísley Pereira Lemos.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Joanna Setchell.

Supplementary Information

Questionnaires used in interviews on primate consumption (ESM Appendix S1), wildlife hunting informative leaflet given to urban people after the interviews (ESM Appendix S2), and the alternative generalized linear models (ESM Appendix S3) are available online. The authors are solely responsible for the content and functionality of these materials. Queries (other than absence of the material) should be directed to the corresponding author.

ESM 1

(DOCX 14 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 13279 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lemos, L.P., Loureiro, L.F., Morcatty, T.Q. et al. Social Correlates of and Reasons for Primate Meat Consumption in Central Amazonia. Int J Primatol 42, 499–521 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-021-00214-6

Download citation

Received: 15 June 2020
Accepted: 02 March 2021
Published: 30 May 2021
Issue Date: June 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-021-00214-6

Keywords

Hunting
Neotropical primates
Preference
Taboos
Wild meat
Wildlife use