Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 435–455 | Cite as

Are Male Orangutans a Threat to Infants? Evidence of Mother–Offspring Counterstrategies to Infanticide in Bornean Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii)

  • Amy M. ScottEmail author
  • Cheryl D. Knott
  • Tri Wahyu Susanto
Article

Abstract

Sexually selected infanticide by males is widespread in primates. Female primates employ a variety of strategies to reduce infanticide risk. While infanticide has never been directly observed in wild orangutans (Pongo spp.), their slow life history makes infants vulnerable to infanticide. The mating strategies of female orangutans include polyandrous and postconceptive mating that may serve to increase paternity confusion, an infanticide avoidance strategy. Here, we investigate whether female orangutans alter their social interactions with males as another infanticide avoidance strategy. We hypothesize that females with younger offspring avoid males and that the distance between mother and offspring decreases in the presence of males. We use long-term behavioral data collected between 1994 and 2016 from Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) in Gunung Palung National Park, Indonesia, to test whether the sexual selection hypothesis for infanticide helps explain aspects of orangutan social behavior. We found that mothers with offspring <6 yr. old both encountered fewer males and spent less time with males during social interactions than did mothers with offspring >6 yr. old and females without offspring. In addition, the distance between a mother–offspring dyad showed a statistically significant decrease in the presence of males, but not females. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that female orangutans employ strategies to reduce infanticide risk in their social interactions. Because orangutans have a high fission–fusion dynamic, they have flexibility in manipulating social interactions as a counterinfanticide strategy. Our results suggest that infanticide by males is a selective pressure shaping female orangutan social behavior.

Keywords

Great apes Male avoidance Male infanticide Orangutan sociality Sexual selection hypothesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Universitas Nasional (UNAS), the Universitas Tanjungpura (UNTAN), the Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, the Directorate of Natural Resource Conservation and Ecosystems (KSDAE), the Gunung Palung National Park office (BTNGP), the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), the Center for Research and Development in Biology (PPPB), and the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (RISTEKDIKTI) for their sponsorship and for granting permission to conduct research in Gunung Palung National Park. This research was supported by grants to CDK from the National Science Foundation (BCS-0936199, BCS-1638823, 9414388); the National Geographic Society; the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation; the Wenner-Gren Foundation; the US Fish and Wildlife Service (F15AP00812, F12AP00369, 98210-8-G661); the Conservation, Food and Health Foundation; Focused on Nature; the Orangutan Conservancy; Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; and the Nacey Maggioncalda Foundation. AMS was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant DGE-1247312 and by a Boston University Graduate Research Abroad Fellowship. We also thank all the dedicated field assistants, research assistants, field managers, and students who assisted with data and sample collection. We would like to thank the editor, two anonymous reviewers, Erin Kane, and Caitlin O’Connell for constructive suggestions on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

AMS and CDK formulated the idea. CDK supported and supervised the collection of data and maintains the long-term database. TWS contributed to field supervision and data collection. CDK and AMS prepared data for analysis. AMS analyzed data and wrote the majority of the manuscript. CDK provided guidance and assisted with data analysis and writing of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10764_2019_97_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 16.1 kb)

References

  1. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49(3), 227–266.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, S., Di Fiore, A., Champion, J., Pavelka, M. S., Páez, J., & Link, A. (2015). Male-directed infanticide in spider monkeys (Ateles spp.). Primates, 56, 173–181.Google Scholar
  3. Ashton, P. S., Givnish, T. J., & Appanah, S. (1988). Staggered flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: New insights into floral induction and the evolution of mast fruiting in the aseasonal tropics. American Naturalist, 132, 44–66.Google Scholar
  4. Aureli, F., Schaffner, C. M., Boesch, C., Bearder, S. K., Call, J., et al (2008). Fission–fusion dynamics. Current Anthropology, 49(4), 627–654.Google Scholar
  5. Banes, G. L., Galdikas, B. M. F., & Vigilant, L. (2015). Male orang-utan bimaturism and reproductive success at Camp Leakey in Tanjung Puting National Park, Indonesia. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69(11), 1785–1794.Google Scholar
  6. Bartlett, T. Q., Sussman, R. W., & Cheverud, J. M. (1993). Infant killing in primates: A review of observed cases with specific reference to the sexual selection hypothesis. American Anthropologist, 95(4), 958–990.Google Scholar
  7. Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.Google Scholar
  8. Beaudrot, L. H., Kahlenberg, S. M., & Marshall, A. J. (2009). Why male orangutans do not kill infants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(11), 1549–1562.Google Scholar
  9. Cords, M., & Fuller, J. L. (2010). Infanticide in Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya: Variation in the occurrence of an adaptive behavior. International Journal of Primatology, 31(3), 409–431.Google Scholar
  10. Core Team, R. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  11. Delgado, R. A. (2003). The function of adult male long calls in wild orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest (3120177).Google Scholar
  12. Delgado, R. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2000). The behavioral ecology and conservation of the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus): A tale of two islands. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9(5), 201–218.Google Scholar
  13. Dobson, A. J., & Barnett, A. (2008). An introduction to generalized linear models. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  14. Emery Thompson, M., & Knott, C. D. (2008). Urinary C-peptide of insulin as a non-invasive marker of energy balance in wild orangutans. Hormones and Behavior, 53(4), 526–535.Google Scholar
  15. Fairbanks, L. A., & McGuire, M. T. (1987). Mother infant relationships in vervet monkeys: Response to new adult males. International Journal of Primatology, 8(4), 351–366.Google Scholar
  16. Fedigan, L., & Jack, K. (2009). Female dispersal in a female-philopatric species, Cebus capucinus. Behaviour, 146(4), 471–497.Google Scholar
  17. Forstmeier, W., & Schielzeth, H. (2011). Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: Overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s curse. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 65, 47–55.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, E. (2002). Female tactics to reduce sexual harassment in the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52(2), 93–101.Google Scholar
  19. Galdikas, B. M. F. (1985a). Orangutan sociality at Tanjung Puting. American Journal of Primatology, 9(2), 101–119.Google Scholar
  20. Galdikas, B. M. (1985b). Adult male sociality and reproductive tactics among orangutans at Tanjung Puting. Folia Primatologica, 45(1), 9–24.Google Scholar
  21. Galdikas, B. M. F., & Wood, J. W. (1990). Birth spacing patterns in humans and apes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 83, 185–191.Google Scholar
  22. Goossens, B., Setchell, J. M., James, S. S., Funk, S. M., Chikhi, L., et al (2006). Philopatry and reproductive success in Bornean orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus). Molecular Ecology, 15(9), 2577–2588.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, C. E. (1988). Reproductive physiology. In J. H. Schwartz (Ed.), Orang-utan biology (pp. 91–103). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gursky-Doyen, S. (2011). Infanticide by a male spectral tarsier (Tarsius spectrum). Primates, 52, 385–389.Google Scholar
  25. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.Google Scholar
  26. Hrdy, S. B. (1977). Infanticide as a primate reproductive strategy. American Scientist, 65(1), 40–49.Google Scholar
  27. Hrdy, S. B. (1979). Infanticide among animals: A review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 13–40.Google Scholar
  28. Hrdy, S. B., & Hausfater, G. (1984). Comparative and evolutionary perspectives on infanticide: Introduction and overview. In G. Hausfater & S. B. Hrdy (Eds.), Infanticide: Comparative and evolutionary perspectives (pp. xiii–xxxv). New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  29. Ichino, S. (2005). Attacks on a wild infant ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) by immigrant males at Berenty, Madagascar: Interpreting infanticide by males. American Journal of Primatology, 67(2), 267–272.Google Scholar
  30. Janson, C. H. (2000). Primate socio-ecology: The end of a golden age. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9(2), 73–86.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, A. E., Knott, C. D., Pamungkas, B., Pasaribu, M., & Marshall, A. J. (2005). A survey of the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) population in and around Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia based on nest counts. Biological Conservation, 121(4), 495–507.Google Scholar
  32. Kane, E. E., & Gnépa, F. (2016). An infanticide attempt after male takeover in Diana monkeys (Cercopithecus diana diana) in Tai, Côte d’Ivoire. African Primates, 11, 37–40.Google Scholar
  33. Knott, C. D. (1998). Changes in orangutan caloric intake, energy balance, and ketones in response to fluctuating fruit availability. International Journal of Primatology, 19(6), 1061–1080.Google Scholar
  34. Knott, C. D. (2005). Energetic responses to food availability in the great apes: Implications for hominin evolution. In D. K. Brockman & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Primate seasonality: Implications for human evolution (pp. 351–378). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Knott, C. D. (2009). Orangutans: Sexual coercion without sexual violence. In M. N. Muller & R. W. Wrangham (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primates and humans (pp. 81–111). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Knott, C. D., Emery-Thompson, M., & Wich, S. A. (2009). The ecology of reproduction in wild orangutans. In S. A. Wich, S. S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia, & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 171-188). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Knott, C. D., & Emery Thompson, M. (2013). Male bi-maturism and the costs of reproduction in wild Bornean orangutans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supplement 150.Google Scholar
  38. Knott, C. D., & Kahlenberg, S. M. (2011). Orangutans: Understanding forced copulations. In C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnion, S. K. Bearder, & R. M. Stumpf (Eds.), Primates in perspective (2nd ed., pp. 313–326). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Knott, C., Beaudrot, L., Snaith, T., White, S., Tschauner, H., & Planansky, G. (2008). Female-female competition in Bornean orangutans. International Journal of Primatology, 29(4), 975–997.Google Scholar
  40. Knott, C. D., Emery Thompson, M., Stumpf, R. M., & McIntyre, M. H. (2010). Female reproductive strategies in orangutans: Evidence for female choice and counterstrategies to infanticide in a species with frequent sexual coercion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277(1678), 105–113.Google Scholar
  41. Knott, C. D., Scott, A. M., O’Connell, C. A., Scott, K. S., Laman, T. G., et al (2019). Possible male infanticide in wild orangutans and a re-evaluation of infanticide risk. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 7806.Google Scholar
  42. Koenig, A., Scarry, C. J., Wheeler, B. C., & Borries, C. (2013). Variation in grouping patterns, mating systems and social structure: What socio-ecological models attempt to explain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368, 20120348.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0348.Google Scholar
  43. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2018). LmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html. Retrieved 17 Jan 2019.
  44. Lukas, D., & Huchard, E. (2014). The evolution of infanticide by males in mammalian societies. Science, 346(6211), 841–844.Google Scholar
  45. Mallinson, J. J. C. (1984). The breeding of great apes at the Jersey wildlife preservation trust and a look into the future. Zoo Biology, 3, 1–11.Google Scholar
  46. Marshall, A. J., Cannon, C. H., & Leighton, M. (2009). Competition and niche overlap between gibbons (Hylobates albibarbis) and other frugivorous vertebrates in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. In S. Lappan & D. J. Whittaker (Eds.), The gibbons (pp. 161–188). Developments in primatology: Progress and prospects. New York: Springer science+business media.Google Scholar
  47. Marshall, A. J., Beaudrot, L., & Wittmer, H. U. (2014). Responses of primates and other frugivorous vertebrates to plant resource variability over space and time at Gunung Palung National Park. International Journal of Primatology, 35, 1178–1201.Google Scholar
  48. Marzec, A. M., Kunz, J. A., Falkner, S., Atmoko, S. S. U., Alavi, S. E., et al (2016). The dark side of the red ape: Male-mediated lethal female competition in Bornean orangutans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70(4), 459–466.Google Scholar
  49. Matsumoto-Oda, A. (1999). Mahale chimpanzees: Grouping patterns and cycling females. American Journal of Primatology, 47(3), 197–207.Google Scholar
  50. Medway, L. (1972). Phenology of a tropical rain forest in Malaya. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 4(2), 117–146.Google Scholar
  51. Mitani, J. C., Gretherj, G. F., Rodman, P. S., & Priatna, D. (1991). Associations among wild orang-utans: Sociality, passive aggregations or chance? Animal Behaviour, 42(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
  52. Mitra Setia, T., Delgado, R. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Singleton, I., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Social organization and male-female relationships. In S. A. Wich, S. S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia, & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 245–253). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Morelli, T. L., Wright, P., King, S., & Pochron, S. (2009). The rules of disengagement: Takeovers, infanticide, and dispersal in a rainforest lemur, Propithecus edwardsi. Behaviour, 146(4), 499–523.Google Scholar
  54. Nishie, H., & Nakamura, M. (2018). A newborn infant chimpanzee snatched and cannibalized immediately after birth: Implications for “maternity leave” in wild chimpanzee. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 165, 194–199.Google Scholar
  55. Otali, E., & Gilchrist, J. S. (2006). Why chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) mothers are less gregarious than nonmothers and males: The infant safety hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59(4), 561–570.Google Scholar
  56. Palombit, R. (2012). Infanticide: Male strategies and female counterstrategies. In J. C. Mitani, J. Call, P. M. Kappeler, R. A. Palombit, & J. B. Silk (Eds.), The evolution of primate societies (pp. 432–468). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pohlert, T. (2014). The pairwise multiple comparison of mean ranks package (PMCMR). R package. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMR. Retrieved 5 Mar 2018.
  58. Pusey, A., Murray, C., Wallauer, W., Wilson, M., Wroblewski, E., & Goodall, J. (2008). Severe aggression among female Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii at Gombe National Park, Tanzania. International Journal of Primatology, 29(4), 949–973.Google Scholar
  59. Rijksen, H. D. (1978). A field study on Sumatran orang utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii, Lesson 1827). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Veenman en Zonen.Google Scholar
  60. Robbins, A. M., Stoinski, T., Fawcett, K., & Robbins, M. M. (2009). Leave or conceive: Natal dispersal and philopatry of female mountain gorillas in the Virunga volcano region. Animal Behaviour, 77(4), 831–838.Google Scholar
  61. Roberts, M. (1994). Growth, development, and parental care in the western tarsier (Tarsius bacanus) in captivity: Evidence for a “slow” life-history and nonmonogamous mating system. International Journal of Primatology, 15(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  62. Rudran, R. (1973). Adult male replacement in one-male troops of purple-faced langurs (Presbytis senex senex) and its effect on population structure. Folia Primatologica, 19, 166–192.Google Scholar
  63. Sakura, O. (1994). Factors affecting party size and composition of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) Bossou, Guinea. International Journal of Primatology, 15(2), 167–183.Google Scholar
  64. Starin, E. D. (1994). Philopatry and affiliation among red colobus. Behaviour, 130(3), 253–270.Google Scholar
  65. Sterck, E. H. M., Watts, D. P., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 291–309.Google Scholar
  66. Stokes, E. J., Parnell, R. J., & Olejniczak, C. (2003). Female dispersal and reproductive success in wild western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54(4), 329–339.Google Scholar
  67. Stumpf, R. M., Emery Thompson, M., & Knott, C. D. (2008). A comparison of female mating strategies in Pan troglodytes and Pongo spp. International Journal of Primatology, 29(4), 865–884.Google Scholar
  68. Sussman, R. W. (1994). Infant killing as an evolutionary strategy: Reality or myth? Evolutionary Anthropology, 3(5), 149–151.Google Scholar
  69. Treves, A. (2000). Prevention of infanticide: The perspective of infant primates. In C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 223–238). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Utami Atmoko, S. S., Singleton, I., van Noordwijk, M. A., van Schaik, C. P., & Mitra Setia, T. (2009). Male–male relationships in orangutans. In S. A. Wich, S. S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia, & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 225–234). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Utami, S. S., Bruford, M. W., De Ruiter, J. R., & van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (2002). Male bimaturism and reproductive success in Sumatran orang-utans. Behavioral Ecology, 13(5), 643–652.Google Scholar
  72. van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: Adaptations against infanticide? In C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 322–360). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2005). Development of ecological competence in Sumatran orangutans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 127(1), 79–94.Google Scholar
  74. van Noordwijk, M. A., Arora, N., Willems, E. P., Dunkel, L. P., Amda, R. N., et al (2012). Female philopatry and its social benefits among Bornean orangutans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(6), 823–834.Google Scholar
  75. van Noordwijk, M. A., Willems, E. P., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Kuzawa, C. W., & van Schaik, C. P. (2013). Multi-year lactation and its consequences in Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67(5), 805–814.Google Scholar
  76. van Noordwijk, M. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Knott, C. D., Kuze, N., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., et al (2018). The slow ape: High infant survival and long inter-birth intervals in orangutans. Journal of Human Evolution, 125, 38–49.Google Scholar
  77. van Schaik, C. P. (1986). Phenological changes in a Sumatran rainforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2, 327–347.Google Scholar
  78. van Schaik, C. P. (2000a). Infanticide by male primates: The sexual selection hypothesis revisited. In C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 27–60). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. van Schaik, C. P. (2000b). Vulnerability to infanticide by males: Patterns among mammals. In C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 61–71). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. van Schaik, C. P. (2000c). Social counterstrategies against infanticide by males in primates and other mammals. In P. M. Kappeler (Ed.), Primate males: Causes and consequences of variation in group composition (pp. 34–52). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. van Schaik, C. P., & Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Infanticide risk and the evolution of male–female association in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 264(1388), 1687–1694.Google Scholar
  82. van Schaik, C. P., & van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1996). Toward an understanding of the orangutan’s social system. In L. F. Marchant (Ed.), Great ape societies (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. van Schaik, C. P., van Noordwijk, M. A., & Nunn, C. L. (1999). Sex and social evolution in primates. In Comparative primate socioecology (pp. 204–240). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. van Schaik, C. P., Pradhan, G. R., & van Noordwijk, M. A. (2004). Mating conflict in primates: Infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality. In P. M. Kappeler & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives (pp. 131–150). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Setia, T. M., Rijksen, H. D., Schurmann, C., & van Schaik, C. P. (2004). Life history of wild Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii). Journal of Human Evolution, 47, 385–398.Google Scholar
  86. Yamagiwa, J., Kahekwa, J., & Basabose, A. K. (2009). Infanticide and social flexibility in the genus Gorilla. Primates, 50, 293–303.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of IndonesiaDepokIndonesia
  3. 3.Department of BiologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations