Primate Fruit Color: Useful Concept or Alluring Myth?
While the importance of frugivorous primates as seed dispersers is well established, the question of the extent to which they exert selective pressure on fruit color phenotypes is contested. Numerous studies have identified suites of primate fruit colors, but the lack of agreement among them illustrates the difficulty of identifying the match between primate foraging behavior and the extent of primate–plant coevolution. This may indicate that primates do not shape fruit traits, at least in a consistent direction, or that the evolution of fruit color is affected by a complex array of selection pressures in which primates play only a part. Here, we review the role of primates in shaping fruit color in the context of primate color vision phenotypes, and fruit phenotypic constraints and selective pressures. To test the hypothesis that fruit color is subjected to selection pressures by primates, we offer six testable predictions aimed at disentangling the complex array of factors that can contribute to fruit color phenotypes, including animal mutualists, animal antagonists, and developmental and phylogenetic constraints of fruits. We conclude that identifying the importance of primate seed dispersers in shaping fruit visual traits is possible, but more complex than previously thought.
KeywordsCoevolution Food selection Fruit color Fruit syndrome Primate fruit syndrome Primate seed dispersal
The authors are grateful to Drs Onja Razafindratsima, Laurence Culot, Yamato Tsuji, and Hiroki Sato for the opportunity to contribute to this special issue on primate seed dispersal, and to two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript. K. Valenta and C. A. Chapman were supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), International Development Research Centre (IDRC), and the Canada Research Chairs program, and O. Nevo was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG; grant ON 2156/1-1).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
- Allen, G. (1879). The colour-sense: Its origin and development. Boston: Houghton.Google Scholar
- Beattie, A. J., & Lyons, N. (1975). Seed dispersal in Viola (Violaceae): Adaptations and strategies. American Journal of Botany, 62, 714–722.Google Scholar
- Bollen, A., Donati, G., Fietz, J., Schwab, D., Ramanamanjato, J.-B., et al (2005). An intersite comparison of fruit characteristics in Madagascar: Evidence for selection pressure through abiotic constraints rather than through co-evolution. In J. L. Dew & J. P. Boublie (Eds.), Tropical Fruits and Frugivores: The Search for Strong Interactors (pp. 93–119). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bueno, R. S., Guevara, R., Ribeiro, M. C., Culot, L., Bufalo, F. S., & Galetti, M. (2013). Functional redundancy and complementarities of seed dispersal by the last neotropical megafrugivores. PLoS One, 8, e56252.Google Scholar
- Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., & MacKinnon, K. C. (2010). Primates in Perspective (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fobes, J. L., & King, J. E. (1982). Vision: the dominant primate modality. In J. L. Fobes & J. E. King (Eds.), Primate behavior (pp. 219–243). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991). The comparative method in evolutionary biology (Vol. 239). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Herrera, C. M., Medrano, M., Rey, P. J., Sánchez-Lafuente, A. M., García, M. B., et al (2002). Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism-and antagonism-related traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 16823–16828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Julliot, C. (1994). Frugivory and seed dispersal by red howler monkeys: Evolutionary aspect. Review d'Ecologie (La Terre et la Vie), 331–341.Google Scholar
- Kaplin, B. A., & Lambert, J. E. (2002). Effectiveness of seed dispersal by Cercopithecus monkeys: Implications for seed input into degraded areas. In D. J. Levey, W. R. Silva, & M. Galetti (Eds.), Seed dispersal and frugivory: Ecology, evolution and conservation (pp. 351–364). New York: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lambert, J. E. (1999). Seed handling in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and redtail monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius): Implications for understanding hominoid and cercopithecine fruit-processing strategies and seed dispersal. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109, 365–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Le Gros Clark, W. E. (1971). The antecedents of man. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Leighton, M. (1983). Vertebrate responses to fruiting seasonality within a Bornean rain forest. In S. L. Sutton, T. C. Whitmore, & A. C. Chadwick (Eds.), Tropical rain forest: Ecology and Management (pp. 181–195). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Linn, C., Nojima, S., & Roelofs, W. (2005). Antagonist effects of non-host fruit volatiles on discrimination of host fruit by Rhagoletis flies infesting apple (Malus pumila), hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), and flowering dogwood (Cornus florida). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 114, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loiselle, B., Blendinger, P., Blake, J., & Ryder, T. (2007). Ecological redundancy in seed dispersal systems: A comparison between manakins (Aves: Pipridae) in two tropical forests. In A. J. Dennis, E. W. Schupp, R. J. Green, & D. A. Westcott (Eds.), Seed dispersal: Theory and its application in a changing world (pp. 178–195). Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murray, K., Winnett-Murray, K., Cromie, E., Minor, M., & Meyers, E. (1993). The influence of seed packaging and fruit color on feeding preferences of American robins. Plant Ecology, 107, 217–226.Google Scholar
- Ordano, M., Blendinger, P. G., Lomáscolo, S. B., Chacoff, N. P., Sánchez, M. S., et al. (2017). The role of trait combination in the conspicuousness of fruit display among bird-dispersed plants. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12899.
- Peichl, L., Kaiser, A., Rakotondraparany, F., Dubielzig, R. R., Goodman, S. M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2017). Diversity of photoreceptor arrangements in nocturnal, cathemeral and diurnal Malagasy lemurs. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24167.
- Ridley, H. N. (1930). The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Ashford: Reeve.Google Scholar
- Ripperger, S. P., Heymann, E. W., Tschapka, M., & Kalko, E. K. (2014). Fruit characteristics associated with fruit preferences in frugivorous bats and saddle-back tamarins in Peru. Ecotropica, 20, 53–63.Google Scholar
- Schupp, E. W. (1993). Quantity, quality and the effectiveness of seed dispersal by animals. Vegetatio, 108, 15–29.Google Scholar
- Snodderly, D. M. (1979). Visual discriminations encountered in food foraging by a neotropical primate: Implications for the evolution of color vision. In E. H. Burtt (Ed.), The Behavioral Significance of Color (237–279). New York: Garland STPM Press.Google Scholar
- Strauss, S. Y., & Whittall, J. B. (2006). Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In L. D. Harder, & S. C. H. Barrett (Eds.), Ecology and evolution of flowers (120–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Terborgh, J. (1983). Five new world primates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Traveset, A., & Verdu, A. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effect of gut treatment on seed germination. In D. Levey, W. R. Silva, & M. Galetti (Eds.), Seed dispersal and frugivory: Ecology, evolution and conservation (pp. 339–350). Oxon: CABI.Google Scholar
- Valenta, K., Edwards, M., Rafaliarison, R. R., Johnson, S. E., Holmes, S. M., Brown, K. A., Dominy, N. J., Lehman, S. M., Parra, E. J., & Melin, A. D. (2016) Visual ecology of true lemurs suggests a cathemeral origin for the primate cone opsin polymorphism. Functional Ecology, 30, 932–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Veilleux, C. C., & Bolnick, D. A. (2009). Opsin gene polymorphism predicts trichromacy in a cathemeral lemur. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 83–90.Google Scholar