Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 871–886 | Cite as

Kinship and Intragroup Social Dynamics in Two Sympatric African Colobus Species

  • Tania Minhós
  • Cláudia Sousa
  • Luis M. Vicente
  • Michael W. Bruford
Article

Abstract

Kinship has been described as a major factor shaping primates’ social dynamics, with individuals biasing their affiliative interactions to their related counterparts. However, it has also been demonstrated that, under certain circumstances, social bonding can be established in the absence of kin. The fact that Colobus polykomos (western black-and-white colobus) and Procolobus badius temminckii (Temminck’s red colobus) often live in sympatry (subject to the same ecological/anthropogenic pressures) but exhibit contrasting social systems makes them good models to test which factors shape their social systems. We investigated the influence of kinship on intragroup social dynamics of one focal group of each species present in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau. Between October 2008 and June 2009 we used focal sampling to collect information on the individuals’ nearest neighbors and ad libitum sampling to collect data on intragroup social interactions. We estimated pairwise relatedness using fecal DNA from 9 individuals of Colobus polykomos and 15 individuals of Procolobus badius temminckii genotyped at 15 microsatellite loci. We found that, in the focal group of Colobus polykomos, individuals showed no preference to interact or be spatially closer to related partners. Moreover, mainly unrelated females and related males composed the focal group of Procolobus badius temminckii but grooming was most frequent among female dyads and only rarely involved male dyads. We conclude that kinship is not an important factor determining the social bonding in either study species, suggesting that other factors, e.g., anthropogenic, ecological, may be at play shaping these groups’ social bonding.

Keywords

Colobines Noninvasive sampling Relatedness Social behavior West Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by a Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia grant (SFRH/BPD/87396/2012) to T. Minhós. We thank Institute of Biodiversity and Protected Areas (IBAP) in Guinea-Bissau for facilitating fieldwork in Guinea-Bissau and providing logistical support. We thank Forestry and Fauna Department (DGFC) and Action for Development (AD) for field assistance and permits and National Institute for Studies and Research (INEP) and Gabinete de Planificação Costeira for providing us with the land cover maps. We sincerely thank Mutaro Galiza, Mamadu (Catomboi), and Saido Kuiaté for the great assistance in the field, helping in the data collection and the local community for welcoming us. We also thank Maria Ferreira da Silva and Rui Sá for the great discussions and their insights across all stages of the work; K. Hockings, C. Casanova A. Barata, and M. Carmo for the great insights during fieldwork; and J. Carvalho for the help with statistical analyses. Finally, we thank the Editor-in-Chief Dr Joanna M Setchell, the Associate Editor James Higham, two anonymous reviewers, and D. Starin, K. Hockings, and R. Xavier for the helpful comments that improved the quality of the manuscript.

References

  1. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49(3/4), 229–267.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, R., Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (1996). Ecology, feeding competition and social structure in baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38(5), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. M. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.Google Scholar
  4. Bercovitch, F. B. (1988). Coalitions, cooperation and reproductive tactics among adult male baboons. Animal Behaviour, 36(4), 1198–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(3), 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carvalho, J. S., Marques, T. A., & Vicente, L. (2013). Population status of Pan troglodytes verus in Lagoas de Cufada Natural Park, Guinea-Bissau. PloS One, 8(8), e71527.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapais, B. (2001). Primate nepotism: what is the explanatory value of kin selection? International Journal of Primatology, 22(2), 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connor, R. C., Heithaus, M. R., & Barre, L. M. (2001). Complex social structure, alliance stability and mating access in a bottlenose dolphin ‘super-alliance.’. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268(1464), 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, S., Casanova, C., Sousa, C., & Lee, P. (2013). The good, the bad and the ugly: perceptions of wildlife in Tombali (Guinea-Bissau, West Africa). Journal of Primatology, 2(110), 2.Google Scholar
  10. Dasilva, G. L. (1989). The ecology of the western black and white colobus (Colobus polykomos polykomos, Zimmerman 1780) on a riverine island in southeastern Sierra Leone. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Decker, B. S. (1994). Effects of habitat disturbance on the behavioral ecology and demographics of the Tana River red colobus (Colobus b. rufomitratus). International Journal of Primatology, 15(5), 703–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Fiore, A. (2003). Molecular genetic approaches to the study of primate behaviour, social organization, and reproduction. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 46(37), 62–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Di Fiore, A., & Rodman, P. S. (2001). Time allocation patterns of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in a neotropical terra firma forest. International Journal of Primatology, 22(3), 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobson, A. J., & Barnett, A. (2002). An introduction to generalized linear models. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fleury, M. C., & Gautier-Hion, A. (1999). Semi-nomadic ranging behavior in a population of black colobus (Colobus satanas) in Gabon and its ecological correlates. International Journal of Primatology, 20(5), 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frankham, R. (2006). Genetics and landscape connectivity. In K. R. Crooks & M. Sanjayan (Eds.), Connectivity conservation (pp. 72–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gagneux, P., Boesch, C., & Woodruff, D. S. (1999). Female reproductive strategies, paternity and community structure in wild West African chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 57(1), 19–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Galat, G., & Galat-Luong, A. (1985). La communauté de primates diurnes de la forêt de Tai, Côte d’Ivoire. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre Vie), 40(1), 3–32.Google Scholar
  19. Gouzoules, H., & Gouzoules, S. (1987). Kinship. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struthsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 299–305). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton, W. D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behavior I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton, W. D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behavior II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 17–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris, T. R., Caillaud, D., Chapman, C., & Vigilant, L. (2009). Neither genetic nor observational data alone are sufficient for understanding sex-biased dispersal in a social-group-living species. Molecular Ecology, 18(8), 1777–1790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hockings, K. J., Anderson, J. R., & Matsuzawa, T. (2012). Socioecological adaptations by chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus, inhabiting an anthropogenically impacted habitat. Animal Behaviour, 83(3), 801–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hockings, K. J., McLennan, M. R., Carvalho, S., Ancrenaz, M., Bobe, R., Byrne, R. W., et al. (2015). Apes in the anthropocene: flexibility and survival. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(4), 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hockings, K. J., & Sousa, C. (2013). Human-chimpanzee sympatry and interactions in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau: current research and future directions. Primate Conservation, 26(1), 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Isbell, L. A. (2004). Is there no place like home? Ecological bases of female dispersal and philopatry and their consequences for the formation of kin groups. In B. Chapais & C. M. Berman (Eds.), Kinship and behaviour in primates (pp. 71–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Isbell, L. A., & van Vuren, D. (1996). Differential costs of locational and social dispersal and their consequences for female group living primates. Behaviour, 133(1/2), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Konovalov, D. A., Manning, C., & Henshaw, M. T. (2004). KINGROUP: a program for pedigree relationship reconstruction and kin group assignments using genetic markers. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4(4), 779–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korstjens, A. H. (2001). The mob, the secret sorority, and the phantoms: An analysis of the socio-ecological strategies of the three colobines of Tai. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  30. Korstjens, A. H., Nijssen, E. C., & Noë, R. (2005). Intergroup relationships in western black-and-white colobus, Colobus polykomos polykomos. International Journal of Primatology, 26(6), 1267–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korstjens, A. H., Sterck, E. H. M., & Noë, R. (2002). How adaptive or phylogenetically inert is primate social behaviour? A test with two sympatric colobines. Behaviour, 139(2–3), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehmann, J., & Boesch, C. (2009). Sociality of the dispersing sex: the nature of social bonds in West African female chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behavior, 77(2), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lynch, M., & Ritland, K. (1999). Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics, 152(4), 1753–1766.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McDonald, D. B., & Potts, W. K. (1994). Cooperative displays and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science, 266(5187), 1030–1032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ménard, N., Motsch, P., Delahaye, A., Saintvanne, A., Le Flohic, G., Dupé, S. et al. (2013). Effect of habitat quality on the ecological behaviour of a temperate-living primate: time-budget adjustments. Primates54(3), 217–228.Google Scholar
  36. Minhós, T., Nixon, L., Sousa, C., Vicente, L., Ferreira da Silva, M., Sá, R., & Bruford, M. W. (2013a). Genetic evidence for spatio-temporal changes in the dispersal patterns of two sympatric African colobine monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 150(3), 464–474.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Minhós, T., Sá, R., Ferreira da Silva, M., Wallace, E., Barata, A., Carmo, M., & Bruford, M. W. (2013b). DNA identification of primate bushmeat from urban markets in Guinea-Bissau and its implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 167, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mortelliti, A., Amori, G., & Boitani, L. (2010). The role of habitat quality in fragmented landscapes: a conceptual overview and prospectus for future research. Oecologia, 163(2), 535–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Oates, J. F. (1977). The social life of black-and-white colobus monkey, Colobus guereza. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 45(1), 1–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Oates, J. F., Gippoliti, S., & Groves, C. P. (2008a). Colobus polykomos. In IUCN 2010. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2010.4. Available at www.iucnredlist.org.
  41. Oates, J. F., Struhsaker, T., McGraw, S., et al. (2008b). Procolobus badius. In IUCN 2011. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2011.2. Available at www.iucnredlist.org.
  42. Onderdonk, D. A., & Chapman, C. A. (2000). Coping with forest fragmentation: the primates of Kibale National Park, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 12(4), 587–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pamilo, P., & Crozier, R. H. (1982). Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: methodology. Theoretical Population Biology, 21(2), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Queller, D. C., & Goodnight, K. F. (1989). Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution, 43, 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Rel. 2.10.0. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  46. R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  47. Sá, R. M., Petrásová, J., Pomajbíková, K., Profousová, I., Petrzelková, K. J., Sousa, C., & Modry, D. (2013). Gastrointestinal symbionts of chimpanzees in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea‐Bissau with respect to habitat fragmentation. American Journal of Primatology, 75(10), 1032–1041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Seyfarth, R. M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 65, 671–698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Siex, K. S. (2003). Effects of population compression on the demography, ecology, and behavior of the Zanzibar red colobus monkey (P. kirkii). Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
  50. Silk, J. B. (1987). Social behavior in evolutionary perspective. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struthsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 318–329). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Silk, J. B. (2002). Kin selection in primate groups. International Journal of Primatology, 23(4), 849–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simão, A. (1997). Identificação e delimitação cartográfica dos grandes maciços florestais de Cantanhez. Relatório de Missão. Acção para o Desenvolvimento: Bissau, Republica da Guiné-Bissau. Acção para o Desemvolvimento, Républica da Guiné-Bissau.Google Scholar
  53. Sousa, J., Barata, A., Sousa, C., Casanova, C., & Vicente, L. (2011). Chimpanzee oil palm use in southern Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau. American Journal of Primatology, 73(5), 485–497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Starin, E. D. (1991). Socioecology of the red colobus in the Gambia with particular reference to female-male differences and transfer patterns. Ph.D. dissertation, The City University of New York.Google Scholar
  55. Starin, E. D. (1994). Philopatry and affiliation among red colobus. Behaviour, 130, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Struhsaker, T. T. (1975). The red colobus monkey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Struhsaker, T. T. (2010). The red colobus monkeys: Variation in demography, behaviour and ecology of an endangered species. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Struhsaker, T. T., & Leland, L. (1979). Socioecology of two sympatric monkey species in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. In J. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, A. Beer, & M. C. Busnel (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior, vol. 9 (pp. 158–228). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Struhsaker, T. T., & Oates, J. F. (1975). Comparison of the behaviour and ecology of red colobus and black-and-white colobus monkeys in Uganda: A summary. In R. H. Tuttle (Ed.), Socioecology and psychology of primates (pp. 103–123). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  60. Teichroeb, J. A., Wikberg, E. C., & Sicotte, P. (2009). Female dispersal patterns in six groups of ursine colobus (Colobus vellerosus): infanticide avoidance is important. Behaviour, 146(4–5), 551–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tutin, C. E. (1999). Fragmented living: behavioural ecology of primates in a forest fragment in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon. Primates40(1), 249–265.Google Scholar
  62. van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (2000). Relationships among non-human primate males: a deductive framework. In P. Kappeler (Ed.), Primate males: Causes and consequences of variation in group composition (pp. 183–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Vigilant, L., Hofreiter, M., Siedel, H., & Boesch, C. (2001). Paternity and relatedness in wild chimpanzee communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(23), 12890–12895.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Villard, M. A. (2002). Habitat fragmentation: major conservation issue or intellectual attractor? Ecological Applications, 12(2), 319–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watts, D., & Mitani, J. (2001). Boundary patrols and intergroup encounters among wild chimpanzees. Behaviour, 138(3), 299–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wieczkowski, J. (2005). Examination of increased annual range of a Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus) group. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 128(2), 381–388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Wikberg, E. C., Sicotte, P., Campos, F. A., & Ting, N. (2012). Between-group variation in female dispersal, kin composition of groups, and proximity patterns in a black-and-white colobus monkey (Colobus vellerosus). PloS One, 7(11), e48740.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wikberg, E. C., Ting, N., & Sicotte, P. (2014). Kinship and similarity in residency status structure female social networks in black-and-white colobus monkeys (Colobus vellerosus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 153(3), 365–376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wrangham, R. W., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania Minhós
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Cláudia Sousa
    • 4
    • 5
  • Luis M. Vicente
    • 6
  • Michael W. Bruford
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas (CAPP), Instituto Superior de Ciência Sociais e PolíticasUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Gulbenkian da Ciência (IGC)OeirasPortugal
  3. 3.Organisms and Environment Division, School of BiosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  4. 4.Departamento de Antropologia, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e HumanasUniversidade Nova de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  5. 5.Centre for Research in Anthropology (CRIA)LisboaPortugal
  6. 6.Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Departamento de Biologia AnimalFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations