Skip to main content

Wild-Born Orangutans (Pongo abelii) Engage in Triadic Interactions During Play

Abstract

It has long been held that triadic interactions, or interactions between individuals that include shared perception and goals concerning an outside entity, require elaborate cognitive processes such as joint attention. With their connection to shared intentionality, triadic interactions have been a key topic of interest for developmental and evolutionary psychologists, notably when making comparisons between humans and other ape species. There is good evidence that chimpanzees and bonobos engage in triadic interactions; however, convincing evidence for orangutans are more limited and so far have been found only in the context of feeding. I engaged 11 wild-born sanctuary orangutans through the medium of a stick, allowing them to decide how to use the object and how to interact with me. The participating orangutans developed idiosyncratic ways of using the stick and engaging with me during the activity, and six of them alternated their gaze between the stick and me. When I interrupted the activity, the participating orangutans displayed more numerous and different behaviors than before the interruption to actively reengage me in the game. Much like human infants, they appeared more interested in the social interaction than in the stick. These findings confirm that triadic interactions occur in nonenculturated orangutans and are consistent with studies of other nonhuman great ape species, which also show triadic interactions, suggesting that joint attention and potentially shared intentionality may have an early origin in our evolutionary history.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Akhtar, N., & Gernsbacher, M. (2008). On privileging the role of gaze in infant social cognition. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bard, K. A. (1992). Intentional behavior and intentional communication in young free-ranging orangutans. Child Development, 63, 1186–1197.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bratman, M. (1992). Shared co-operative activity. Philosophical Review, 101, 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buttelmann, D., Schütte, S., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Great apes infer others’ goals based on context. Animal Cognition, 15(6), 1037–1053.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Call, J. (2009). Contrasting the social cognition of humans and nonhuman apes: the shared intentionality hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 368–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1994). Production and comprehension of referential pointing by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(4), 307–317.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carpenter, M., & Call, J. (2013). How joint is the joint attention of apes and human infants? In S. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), Agency and joint attention. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cartmill, E. A., & Byrne, R. W. (2007). Orangutans modify their gestural signaling according to their audience’s comprehension. Current Biology, 17(15), 1345–1348.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Entremont, B., & Seamans, E. (2007). Do infants need social cognition to act socially? An alternative look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78(3), 723–728.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner, R. A., & Gardner, B. T. (1969). Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science, 165, 664–672.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Genty, E., Breuer, T., Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2009). Gestural communication of the gorilla (Gorilla gorilla): repertoire, intentionality and possible origins. Animal Cognition, 12, 527–546.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gomez, J. (2004). Apes, monkeys, children and the growth of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gómez, J.-C. (2007). Pointing behaviors in apes and human infants: a balanced interpretation. Child Development, 78(3), 729–734.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gómez, J.-C. (2010). The ontogeny of triadic cooperative interactions with humans in an infant gorilla. Interaction Studies, 11, 353–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gruber, T., Singleton, I., & van Schaik, C. P. (2012). Sumatran orangutans differ in their cultural knowledge but not in their cognitive abilities. Current Biology, 22(23), 2231–2235.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kellogg, W. N., & Kellogg, L. A. (1933). The ape and the child: A study of environmental influence upon early behavior. New York: Whittlesey House.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leavens, D. A., & Bard, K. A. (2011). Environmental influences on joint attention in great apes: implications for human cognition. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(1), 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leavens, D. A., & Racine, T. (2009). Joint attention in apes and humans: are humans unique? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16, 240–267.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leavens, D. A., Russell, J. M., & Hopkins, W. D. (2005). Intentionality as measured in the persistence and elaboration of communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Child Development, 76(1), 291–306.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lyn, H., Greenfield, P. M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Gillespie-Lynch, K., & Hopkins, W. D. (2011). Nonhuman primates do declare! A comparison of declarative symbol and gesture use in two children, two bonobos, and a chimpanzee. Language and Communication, 31, 63–74.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maclean, E., & Hare, B. (2013). Spontaneous triadic engagement in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, Advance online publication.

  23. Miles, H. L. W. (1990). The cognitive foundations for reference in a signing orangutan. In S. T. Parker & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Comparative developmental perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moore, J. W., Teufel, C., Subramaniam, N., Davis, G., & Fletcher, P. C. (2013). Attribution of intentional causation influences the perception of observed movements: Behavioural evidence and neural correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 23. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00023.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mosteller, F., & Rourke, R. (1973). Sturdy statistics: Nonparametrics & order statistics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Patterson, F., & Linden, E. (1981). The education of Koko. New York: Owl.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pika, S., & Zuberbühler, K. (2008). Social games between bonobos and humans: evidence for shared intentionality? American Journal of Primatology, 70(3), 207–210.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rijksen, H. D. (1978). A field study on Sumatran orang utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii Lesson 1827): Ecology, behaviour and conservation. Wageningen: H. Veenman Zonen BV.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ross, H. S., & Lollis, S. P. (1987). Communication within infant social games. Developmental Psychology, 23, 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Russon, A., & Andrews, K. (2011). Orangutan pantomime: elaborating the message. Biology Letters, 7(4), 627–630.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1986). Ape language. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Rumbaugh, D. M., & McDonald, K. (1985). Language learning in two species of apes. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 9(4), 653–665.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tanner, J. E., & Byrne, R. W. (2010). Triadic and collaborative play by gorillas in social games with objects. Animal Cognition, 13, 591–607.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Gluckman, A. (1997). Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Development, 68(6), 1067–1080.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–735.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78(3), 705–722.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C. D., Singleton, I., et al. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299(5603), 102–105.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Warneken, F., Chen, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. Child Development, 77, 640–663.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Warneken, F., Gräfenhain, M., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Collaborative partner or social tool? New evidence for young children’s understanding of joint intentions in collaborative activities. Developmental Science, 15, 54–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wich, S. A., Sterck, E. H. M., & Utami, S. S. (1999). Are orangutan females as solitary as chimpanzee females? Folia Primatologica, 70, 23–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the Indonesian Research and Technology Ministry (RISTEK) and all competent authorities for authorization to work in Indonesia, Ian Singleton and staff at Batu Mbelin, and Yayasan Ekosistem Lestari (YEL) for assistance at Sibolangit. I thank the Universitas Nasional (UNAS) for their support and collaboration, particularly Pak Tatang Mitra Setia, Ibu Sri Suci Utami Atmoko, and Fitriah Basalamah. I thank the Fyssen Foundation and the A. H. Schultz Foundation for supporting my work in Indonesia and Zanna Clay, Cat Hobaiter, Maria van Noordwijk, and Eliane Müller for English proofing and comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. I thank Joanna Setchell and two anonymous reviewers for their comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thibaud Gruber.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(WMV 32467 kb)

(WMV 46478 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 178 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruber, T. Wild-Born Orangutans (Pongo abelii) Engage in Triadic Interactions During Play. Int J Primatol 35, 411–424 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-013-9745-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Great apes
  • Joint attention
  • Object play
  • Orangutan
  • Pongo
  • Triadic interaction