International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 743–748 | Cite as

Habitat Impoverishment and Egg Predation by Alouatta caraya

  • Júlio César Bicca-Marques
  • Carina Barboza Muhle
  • Helissandra Mattjie Prates
  • Sabine Garcia de Oliveira
  • Cláudia Calegaro-Marques
Article

Abstract

Species response to habitat loss, fragmentation, or alteration ranges from intolerance and extinction to tolerance and population growth. An ability to increase trophic niche breadth is likely to play a key role in promoting tolerance to habitat change in many species. Howlers (Alouatta spp.) are good examples of these tolerant species. Researchers have related their capacity to thrive well in disturbed habitats to their ability to exploit an eclectic vegetarian diet. Despite >50,000 h of observation of habituated free-ranging groups throughout the distribution of Alouatta, no case of intentional ingestion of animal matter has ever been observed. Here, we report an unexpected trophic niche broadening for free-ranging groups of black-and-gold howlers (Alouatta caraya) living in small (≤2 ha) impoverished habitat islands in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. We studied 3 isolated social groups (15–17, 12–14, and 5 individuals) and observed 1 of them preying on birds’ nests. We recorded 19 events of egg-eating during 2274 h of observation in 1 group and 2 suspected cases in another. Our findings highlight the dietary flexibility that characterize howlers and contrast with the widely held view that they observe a strictly vegetarian diet.

Keywords

Alouatta caraya habitat deterioration herbivory to omnivory increase in trophic niche breadth nest predation 

References

  1. Bicca-Marques, J. C. (2003). How do howler monkeys cope with habitat fragmentation? In L. K. Marsh (Ed.), Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation (pp. 283–303). New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Bicca-Marques, J. C., & Calegaro-Marques, C. (1994a). Exotic plant species can serve as staple food sources for wild howler populations. Folia Primatologica, 63, 209–211.Google Scholar
  3. Bicca-Marques, J. C., & Calegaro-Marques, C. (1994b). Feeding behavior of the black howler monkey (Alouatta caraya) in a seminatural forest. Acta Biologica Leopoldensia, 16, 69–84.Google Scholar
  4. Bravo, S. P., & Zunino, G. E. (1998). Effects of black howler monkey (Alouatta caraya) seed ingestion on insect larvae. American Journal of Primatology, 45, 411–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chitolina, O. P., & Sander, M. (1981). Contribuição ao conhecimento da alimentação de Alouatta guariba clamitans Cabrera, 1940 em habitat natural no Rio Grande do Sul (Cebidae, Alouattinae). Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 59, 37–44.Google Scholar
  6. Crockett, C. M. (1998). Conservation biology of the genus Alouatta. International Journal of Primatology, 19, 549–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crockett, C. M., & Eisenberg, J. F. (1987). Howlers: Variations in group size and demography. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 54–68). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999). Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature, 400, 563–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emlen, J. M. (1968). Optimal choice in animals. American Naturalist, 102, 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Estrada, A., & Coates-Estrada, R. (1996). Tropical rain forest fragmentation and wild populations of primates at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. International Journal of Primatology, 17, 759–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lens, L., van Dongen, S., Norris, K., Githiru, M., & Matthysen, E. (2002). Avian persistence in fragmented rainforest. Science, 298, 1236–1238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin, P., & Bateson, P. (1993). Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Moynihan, M. (1976). The New World primates: Adaptive radiation and the evolution of social behavior, languages, and intelligence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Neville, M. K., Glander, K. E., Braza, F., & Rylands, A. B. (1988). The howling monkeys, genus Alouatta. In R. A. Mittermeier, A. B. Rylands, A. F. Coimbra-Filho & G. A. B. Fonseca (Eds.), Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates (Vol. 2, pp. 349–453). Washington: World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
  15. Rodrigues, A. S. L., Pilgrim, J. D., Lamoreux, J. F., Hoffmann, M., & Brooks, T. M. (2006). The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 71–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwarzkopf, L., & Rylands, A. B. (1989). Primate species richness in relation to habitat structure in Amazonian rainforest fragments. Biological Conservation, 48, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Silver, S. C., Ostro, L. E. T., Yeager, C. P., & Horwich, R. (1998). Feeding ecology of the black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) in northern Belize. American Journal of Primatology, 45, 263–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Urquiza-Haas, T., Serio-Silva, J. C., & Hernández-Salazar, L. T. (2008). Traditional nutritional analyses of figs overestimates intake of most nutrient fractions: a study of Ficus perforata consumed by howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata mexicana). American Journal of Primatology, 70, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Júlio César Bicca-Marques
    • 1
  • Carina Barboza Muhle
    • 1
  • Helissandra Mattjie Prates
    • 1
  • Sabine Garcia de Oliveira
    • 1
  • Cláudia Calegaro-Marques
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratório de Primatologia, Faculdade de BiociênciasPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiociênciasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations