Anderson, R. P., Gómez-Laverde, M., & Peterson, A. T. (2002). Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 131–141. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00275.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Ayres, J. M. (1989). Comparative feeding ecology of the uakari and bearded saki, Cacajao and Chiropotes. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 697. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(89)90101-2.
Article
Google Scholar
Boinski, S. (1987). Habitat use by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi) in Costa Rica. Folia Primatologica, 49, 151–167. doi:10.1159/000156319.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bonvicino, C. R., Boubli, J. P., Otazu, I. B., Almeida, F. C., Nascimento, F. F., Coura, J. R., et al. (2003). Morphologic, Karyotypic and Molecular Evidence of a New Form of Chiropotes (Primates, Pitheciinae). American Journal of Primatology, 61, 123–133.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Boubli, J. P. (1997). A Study of the Black Uakari, Cacajao melanocephalus, in the Pico da Neblina National Park, Brazil. Neotropical Primates, 5(4), 113–115.
Google Scholar
Boubli, J. P. (2002). Western Extention of the Range of Bearded Sakis: a Possible New Taxon of Chiropotes Sympatric with Cacajao in Pico da Neblina National Park, Brazil. Neotropical Primates, 10(1), 1–4.
Google Scholar
Boubli, J. P., Silva, M. N. F., Amado, M. V., Herbk, T., Pontual, F. B., & Farias, I. (2008). A taxonomic reassessment of black uakari monkey, Cacajao melanocephalus, Humboldt (1811), with the description of two new species. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 723–741. doi:10.1007/s10764-008-9248-7.
Article
Google Scholar
Burgess, N. D., Loucks, C., Stolton, S., & Dudley, N. (2007). The potential of forest reserves for augmenting the protected area network in Africa. Oryx, 41, 151–159. doi:10.1017/S0030605307001895.
Article
Google Scholar
Cabeza, M., Araújo, M. B., Wilson, R. J., Thomas, C. D., Cowley, M. J. R., & Moilanen, A. (2004). Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 252–262. doi:doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00905.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Colinvaux, P. A., De Oliveira, P. E., Moreno, J. E., Miller, M. C., & Bush, M. B. (1996). A long Pollen Record from Lowland Amazonia: Forest and Cooling in Glacial Times. Science, 274, 85–88.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Connell, J. H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199, 1302. doi:10.1126/science.199.4335.1302.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P., Dudik, M., Lohmann, L. G., Loiselle, B. A., et al. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distribution from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129–151. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Graham, C. H., & Hijmans, R. J. (2006). A comparison of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 578–587. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00257.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Guisan, A., & Thuiller, W. (2005). Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8, 993–1009. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Haugaasen, T., & Peres, C. A. (2005). Primate assemblage structure in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. American Journal of Primatology, 67, 243–258. doi:10.1002/ajp.20180.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Hernandez, P. A., Graham, C. H., Master, L. L., & Albert, D. L. (2006). The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 29, 773–785. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Hijmans, R. J., & Graham, C. H. (2006). The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biology, 12, 2272–2281. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01256.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P., & Jarvis, A. (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965–1978. doi:10.1002/joc.1276.
Article
Google Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415–442.
Google Scholar
Jepson, P., & Whittaker, R. J. (2002). Ecoregionsin context: a critique with special reference to Indonesia. Conservation Biology, 16, 42–57. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01143.x.
Article
Google Scholar
London, M., & Kelly, B. (2007). The Last Forest: The Amazon in the age of globalization. New York: Random House.
Google Scholar
Olson, D. M. & Dinerstein, E. (2002). The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 89(2), 199–224.
Article
Google Scholar
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., et al. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience, 51, 933–938. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2.
Article
Google Scholar
Ortega-Huerta, M. A., & Peterson, A. T. (2004). Modelling spatial patterns of biodiversity for conservation prioritization in North-eastern Mexico. Diversity & Distributions, 10, 39–54. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00051.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M., & Peterson, A. T. (2007). Predicting species distributions from small number of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 102–117. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Peterson, A. T., Papes, M., & Eaton, M. (2007). Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and MAXENT. Ecograpghy, 30, 550–560.
Google Scholar
Phillips, S. J., Dudik, M., & Schapire, R. E.(2004). A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference in Machine Learning (pp. 655–662). New York: ACM Press.
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190, 231–259. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026.
Article
Google Scholar
Pulliam, H. R. (2000). On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters, 3, 349–361. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00143.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Rapoport, E. (1982). Areography: Geographical strategies of species p. 269. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Google Scholar
Redford, K. H., Coppolillo, P., Sanderson, E. W., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Dinerstein, E., Grooves, C., et al. (2003). Mapping the conservation landscape. Conservation Biology, 17, 116–131. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01467.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Soberón, J., & Peterson, A. T. (2005). Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics, 1, 14–22.
Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1852). On the monkeys of the Amazon. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 20, 107–110.
Google Scholar
Wilson, K., Pressey, R. L., Newton, A., Burgman, M., Possingham, H., & Weston, C. (2005). Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environmental Management, 35, 527–543. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0095-9.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar