International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 225–243 | Cite as

Evaluating Dominance Styles in Assamese and Rhesus Macaques



Researchers have suggested that several types of agonistic and affiliative behavior covary as a set of species-specific traits, and have used the term dominance style to describe the covariation. We compared measures of dominance style between a group of Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis) and a group of rhesus macaques (M. mulatta), though kinship information was unknown. Assamese and rhesus female-female dyads each showed a low proportion of counter aggression and a low conciliatory tendency, suggesting that they have despotic social relationships. They also showed a despotic pattern on several other types of agonistic and affiliative behavior, such as approach outcomes and grooming distributions, which is consistent with the covariation of dominance style traits. Assamese male-male dyads showed relatively high levels of reconciliation and counter aggression versus other macaque males portrayed in the literature, suggesting that Assamese males have a tolerant dominance style. Insofar as macaque dominance style depends on the behavior of females, we suggest that Assamese macaques, like rhesus macaques, have despotic social relationships, which contrasts with evidence of a strong correlation between phylogeny and dominance style in macaques. Further, our results indicate that strong male bonding and tolerant dominance relationships among males are independent of female dominance style. Lastly, some measures of agonistic behavior, such as rate of aggression or proportion of bites, are likely altered in competitive environments and thus are not useful indicators of dominance style.


counter aggression despotic dominance style Macaca assamensis Macaca mulatta reconciliation 


  1. Abegg, C., Thierry, B., & Kaumanns, W. (1996). Reconciliation in three groups of lion-tailed macaques. International Journal of Primatology, 17, 803–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aureli, F. (1992). Post-conflict behavior among wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aureli, F., Das, M., & Veenema, H. C. (1997). Differential kinship effect on reconciliation in three species of macaques (Macaca fascicularis, M. fuscata, and M. sylvanus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 91–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berman, C. M., Ionica, C. S., Dorner, M., & Li, J. (2006). Postconflict affiliation between former opponents in Macaca thibetana on Mt. Huangshan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 827–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman, C. M., Ionica, C. S., & Li, J. H. (2004). Dominance style among Macaca thibetana on Mt. Huangshan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 25, 1283–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein, I. S., & Cooper, M. A. (1999). Dominance in Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology, 48, 283–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstein, I. S., & Ehardt, C. L. (1985). Age-sex differences in the expression of agonistic behavior in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) groups. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 99, 115–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, I. S., Williams, L., & Ramsey, M. (1983). The expression of aggression in Old World monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 4, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buzas, M., & Gibson, T. (1969). Species diversity: Benthonic Foraminifera in the western North Atlantic. Science, 163, 72–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Call, J., Aureli, F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (1999). Reconciliation patterns among stumptailed macaques: A multivariate approach. Animal Behavior, 58, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castles, D. L., Aureli, F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (1996). Variation in conciliatory tendency and relationship quality across groups of pigtail macaques. Animal Behavior, 52, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castles, D. L., & Whiten, A. (1998). Post-conflict behaviour of wild olive baboons. I. Reconciliation, redirection and consolation. Ethology, 104, 126–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chikazawa, D., Gordon, T., Bean, C., & Bernstein, I. (1979). Mother-daughter dominance reversals in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Primates, 20, 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, M. A., Aureli, F., & Singh, M. (2007). Sex differences in reconciliation and post-conflict anxiety in bonnet macaques. Ethology, 113, 26–38.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, M. A., & Bernstein, I. S. (2000). Social grooming in Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology, 50, 77–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, M. A., & Bernstein, I. S. (2002). Counter aggression and reconciliation in assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology, 56, 215–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Datta, S., & Beauchamp, G. (1991). Effects of group demography on dominance relationships among female primates. I: Mother-daughter and sister-sister relations. American Naturalist, 138, 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Waal, F. B. M. (1977). The organization of agonistic relations within two captive groups of Java monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Zeitshrift für Tierpschychologie, 44, 225–282.Google Scholar
  19. de Waal, F. B. M., & Luttrell, L. (1989). Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: Different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 19, 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Waal, F. B. M., & Yoshihara, D. (1983). Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. Behaviour, 85, 224–241.Google Scholar
  21. Delson, E. (1980). Fossil macaques, phyletic relationships and a scenario of deployment. In D. Lindburg (Ed.) The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution pp. 10–30. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  22. Flack, J. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2004). Dominance style, social power, and conflict management: a conceptual framework. In B. Thierry, M. Singh, & W. Kaumanns (Eds.) Macaque Societies: A Model for the Study of Social Organization (pp. 157–182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fooden, J. (1982). Taxonomy and evolution of the sinica group of macaques: 3. Species and subspecies accounts of Macaca assamensis. Fieldiana Zoologica, 10, 1–52.Google Scholar
  24. Fooden, J. (1986). Taxonomy and evolution of the sinica group of macaques: 5. Overview of natural history. Fieldiana Zoologica, 29, 1–22.Google Scholar
  25. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1999). An individual-oriented model of the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B—Biological Sciences, 266(1417), 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill, W., & Bernstein, I. S. (1969). On the morphology, behavior and systematic status of the Assam macaque (Macaca assamensis McClelland, 1939). Primates, 10, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoelzer, G., & Melnick, D. (1996). Evolutionary relationships of the macaques. In J. Fa, & D. Lindburg (Eds.) Evolution and Ecology of Macaque Societies (pp. 3–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Isbell, L. A., & Young, T. P. (2002). Ecological models of female social relationships in primates: Similarities, disparities, and some directions for future clarity. Behaviour, 139, 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaufman, I., & Rosenblum, L. (1966). A behavioral taxonomy for Macaca nemestrina and Macaca radiata: Based on longitudinal observation of family groups in the laboratory. Primates, 7, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kawamura, S. (1965). Matriarchal social ranks in the Minoo-B group: A study of Japanese monkeys. In K. Imanishi, & S. Altmann (Eds.) Japanese Monkeys: A Collection of Translations (pp. 66–86). Atlanta: Emory University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Koenig, A., Larney, E., Lu, A., & Borries, C. (2004). Agonistic behavior and dominance relationships in female Phayre’s leaf monkeys—preliminary results. American Journal of Primatology, 64, 351–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kummer, H. (1971). Primate Societies: Group Techniques of Ecological Adaptation. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  33. Kummer, H., Goetz, W., & Angst, W. (1974). Triadic differentiation: An inhibitory process protecting pair bonds in baboons. Behaviour, 49, 62–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kutsukake, N., & Castles, D. L. (2001). Reconciliation and variation in post-conflict stress in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata fuscata): Testing the integrated hypothesis. Animal Cognition, 4, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Majolo, B., Ventura, R., & Koyama, N. (2005). Postconflict behavior among male Japanese macaques. International Journal of Primatology, 26, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsumura, S. (1996). Postconflict affiliative contacts between former opponents among wild moor macaques (Macaca maurus). American Journal of Primatology, 38, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matsumura, S., & Kobayashi, T. (1998). A game model for dominance relations among group-living animals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Menard, N., & Vallet, D. (1996). Demography and ecology of Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) in two different habitats. In J. Fa, & D. Lindburg (Eds.) Evolution and Ecology of Macaque Societies (pp. 106–131). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nakamichi, M., Itoigawa, N., Imakawa, S., & Machida, S. (1995). Dominance relations among adult females in a free-ranging group of Japanese monkeys at Katsuyama. American Journal of Primatology, 37, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ogawa, H. (1995). Bridging behavior and other affiliative interactions among male Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana). International Journal of Primatology, 16, 707–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petit, O., Abegg, C., & Thierry, B. (1997). A comparative study of aggression and conciliation in three cercopithecine monkeys (Macaca fuscata, Macaca nigra, Papio papio). Behaviour, 134, 415–432.Google Scholar
  42. Petit, O., & Thierry, B. (1992). Affiliative function of the silent bared-teeth display in Moor macaques (Macaca maurus): Further evidence for the particular status of Sulawesi macaques. International Journal of Primatology, 13, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Preuschoft, S. (2004). Power and communication. In B. Thierry, M. Singh, & W. Kaumanns (Eds.) Macaque Societies: A Model for the Study of Social Organization (pp. 56–60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Preuschoft, S., & Paul, A. (2000). Dominance, egalitarianism, and stalemate: An experimental approach to male-male competition. In P. M. Kappeler (Ed.) Primate Males: Causes and Consequences of Variation in Group Composition (pp. 205–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Preuschoft, S., Paul, A., & Kuester, J. (1998). Dominance styles of female and male Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Behaviour, 135, 731–755.Google Scholar
  46. Schino, G., Rosati, L., & Aureli, F. (1998). Intragroup variation in conciliatory tendencies in captive Japanese macaques. Behaviour, 135, 897–912.Google Scholar
  47. Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1984). Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308, 541–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Silk, J. B. (1994). Social relationships of male bonnet macaques: Male bonding in a matrilineal society. Behaviour, 130, 271–291.Google Scholar
  49. Silk, J. B., & Samuels, A. (1984). Triadic interactions among Macaca radiata: Passports and buffers. American Journal of Primatology, 6, 373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singh, M., Akram, N., & Pirta, R. (1984). Evolution of demographic patterns in the bonnet monkey (Macaca radiata). In M. L. Roonwal, S. M. Mohnot, & N. S. Rathore (Eds.) Current Primate Researchers (pp. 7–16). Jodhpur, India: University of Jodhpur Press.Google Scholar
  51. Singh, M., Singh, M., Sharma, A., & Krishna, B. (2003). Methodological considerations in measurement of dominance in primates. Current Science, 84, 709–713.Google Scholar
  52. Sinha, A., Mukhopadhyay, K., Datta-Roy, A., & Ram, S. (2005). Ecology proposes, behavior disposes: Ecological variability in social organization and male behavioral strategies among wild bonnet macaques. Current Science, 89, 1166–1179.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, R. J., & Jungers, W. L. (1997). Body mass in comparative primatology. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 523–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sterck, E., Watts, D. P., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taub, D. (1980). Testing the ‘agonistic buffering’ hypothesis I. The dynamics of participation in the triadic interaction. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thierry, B. (1985). Patterns of agonistic interactions in three species of macaque (Macaca mulatta, M. fascicularis, M. tonkeana). Aggressive Behavior, 11, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thierry, B. (1990). Feedback loop between kinship and dominance: The macaque model. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 145, 511–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thierry, B. (2000). Covariation of conflict management patterns across macaque species. In F. Aureli, & F. B. M. de Waal (Eds.) Natural Conflict Resolution (pp. 106–128). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  59. Thierry, B., Iwaniuk, A. N., & Pellis, S. M. (2000). The influence of phylogeny on the social behaviour of macaques (Primates: Cercopithecidae, genus Macaca). Ethology, 106, 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thoren, S., Lindenfors, P., & Kappeler, P. M. (2006). Phylogenetic analyses of dimorphism in primates: Evidence for stronger selection on canine size than on body size. American Journal Physical Anthropology, 130, 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Veenema, H. C., Das, M., & Aureli, F. (1994). Methodological improvements for the study of reconciliation. Behavioural Processes, 31, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wittig, R. M., & Boesch, C. (2003). The choice of post-conflict interactions in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour, 140, 1527–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wittig, R. M., & Boesch, C. (2005). How to repair relationships—Reconciliation in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Ethology, 111, 736–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhao, Q., & Deng, Z. (1988). Macaca thibetana at Mt. Emei, China: III. Group composition. American Journal of Primatology, 16, 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations