Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Saltatory Search in Free-Living Callithrix jacchus: Environmental and Age Influences

International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers generally categorize motile foraging behavior into 3 strategies: ambush, cruise, and saltatory searching. During saltatory searches, predators move from one location to the next, frequently pausing to scan for prey that are hard to detect and widely distributed. We investigated whether 1) the foraging strategy of free-living common marmosets conforms to the strategy; 2) scanning occurs solely when the individual is stationary; 3) the environment (dense and sparse vegetation) influences foraging behavior; and 4) the age of the marmosets is related to their foraging behavior. Bezerra carried out the observations in a 32-ha fragment of Atlantic Forest in the Northeast of Brazil and in an adjacent condominium. Using the focal sampling method, we observed 31 common marmosets, including adults, juveniles, and infants, Bezerra recorded the following behaviors (in dense and sparse vegetation): locomotion (subdivided into minor locomotion—moving distances ≤1 m; major locomotion—moving distances >1 m), scan, pause, and capture. The frequency of scanning behavior was significantly greater when individuals were stationary. Adults and juveniles exhibited the clearest differentiation in terms of locomotion, both adjusting the behavior in accordance with the environment; periods of major locomotion were more frequent in sparse vegetation, whereas minor locomotion was more frequent in dense vegetation. In contrast, infants exhibited major locomotion more frequently in dense vegetation. We conclude that common marmosets use a saltatory strategy when foraging, and that their foraging behavior is plastic, changing both with the age of the individual and with the density of the vegetation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Alonso, C., & Langguth, A. (1989). Ecologia e comportamento de Callithrix jacchus (Primates: Callitrichidae) numa ilha de Floresta Atlântica. Revista Nordestina de Biologica, 6, 105–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. P., Stephens D. W., & Dumbar S. R. (1997). Saltatory search: A theoretical analysis. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. (1981). On optimal predator search. Theoretical Population Biology, 19, 58–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, M. D. (1978). Insects in Perspective. New York: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auricchio, P. (1995). Primatas do Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Terra Brasilis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, A., & Moreno, E. (1999). Evolution of foraging strategies in shorebirds: An ecomorphological approach. The Auk, 116, 712–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, V. S., Leal, I. R., Iannuzzi, L., & Almeida-Cortez, J. (2005). Distribution pattern of herbivorous insects in a remnant of Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Neotropical Entomology, 34, 701–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasom, S. L., & Haucke, H. H. (1975). A comparison of four distance sampling techniques in South Texas live oak mottes. Journal of Range Management, 28, 142–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. J. (1991). Searching Behaviour: The Behavioral Ecology of Finding Resources. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownsmith, C. B. (1977). Foraging rates of starling in two habitats. Condor, 79, 386–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, M. A. (2005). Foraging mode of the chameleon, Bradypodion pumilum: A challenge to the sit-and-wait versus active forager paradigm? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 797–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzi, J. Z. (2005). Entomologia. Editora da Universidade Federal do Paraná: Curitiba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine, N. G. (1996). Foraging for animal prey by outdoor groups of Geoffroy’s marmosets (Callithrix geoffroyi). International Journal of Primatology, 17, 933–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. L. (1968). On the methods of resource division in grassland bird communities. American Naturalist, 102, 107–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2005). The foraging mode controversy: Both continuous variation and clustering of foraging movements occur. Journal of Zoology, London, 267, 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. T., & McIntosh, R. P. (1950). The interrelation of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31, 434–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, L. B., Crews, D., & Wilczynski, W. (1999). Spatial and reversal learning in congeneric lizards with different foraging strategies. Animal Behavior, 57, 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. M., Peres, C. A., & Pinder, L. (1997). Foraging ecology and use of space in wild golden lions tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia). American Journal of Primatology, 41, 289–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1994). Primate Social Systems. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1999). Grundriss der vergleichenden Verhaltensforshung. München: Piper Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eifler, D. A., & Eifler, M. A. (1999). Foraging behavior and spacing patterns of the lizard Oligosoma grande. Journal of Herpetology, 33, 632–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, S. F., & Lopes Ferrari, M. A. (1989). A re-evaluation of the social organization of the Callitrichidae, with reference to the ecological differences between genera. Folia Primatologica, 52, 132–147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, S. F., & Lopes Ferrari, M. A. (1990). Predator avoidance behaviour in the buffy-headed marmoset, Callithrix flaviceps. Primates, 31, 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getty, T. (1993). Search tactics and frequency-dependent prey detection. American Naturalist, 141, 804–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getty, T., & Pullian, H. R. (1991). Random prey detection with pause-travel search. American Naturalist, 138, 1459–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullan, P. J., & Cranston, P. S. (2000). The Insects: An outline of Entomology. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, L. G., Bezerra, B. M., & Souto, A. S. (2006). Can wild common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) solve the parallel strings task? Animal Cognition. Online First. Published online: March 15, 2006.

  • Hershkovitz, P. (1977). Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrini): With an Introduction to Primates, Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcraft, J. G. C., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Packer, C. (2005). Planning for success: Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 559–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huey, R. B., & Pianka, E. R. (1981). Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology, 62, 991–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J. C. (1977). Interaction between parents and infants and the development of independence in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Animal Behavior, 25, 811–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenagy, G. J. (1973). Daily and seasonal patterns of activity and energetic in a heteromyid rodent community. Ecology, 54, 1201–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kierulff, M. C. M., Raboy, B. E., Oliveira, P. P., Miller, K., Passos, F., & Prado, F. (2002). Behavioral ecology of lion tamarins. In D. Kleiman, & A. B. Rylands, (eds.), Lion Tamarins: Biology and Conservation (pp. 157–187). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, R. A. (1996). Handbook of Ethological Methods. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyhe, J. E., & Ritchison, G. (2004). Perch sites and hunting behavior of red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). Journal of Raptor Research, 38, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, W., Alonso, C., & Langguth, A. (1982). Field observations on Callithrix jacchus jacchus L. Zeitshrift Säugertierkunde 47:334–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranhão, Z. C. (1976). Entomologia geral. São Paulo: Livraria Nobel S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita, T. (2005). Contrasting patch residence strategy in two species of sit-and-wait foragers under the same environment: A constraint by life history? Ethology, 111, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny, V., & Basset, Y. (2005). Host specificity of insect herbivores in tropical forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society B—Biological Sciences, 272, 1083–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny, V., Basset, Y, Miller, S. E., Weiblen, G. D., Bremer, B., Cizek, L., & Drozd, P. (2002). Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature, 416, 841–844.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien W. J., Browman, H. I., & Evans B. I. (1990). Search strategies of foraging animals. American Scientist, 78, 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, W. J., Evans, B. I., & Browman, H. I. (1989). Flexible search tactics and efficient foraging in saltatory searching animals. Oecologia, 80, 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price E. C., & Feistner A. T. C. (1993). Food sharing in lion tamarins: Tests of three hypotheses. American Journal of Primatology, 31, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reaney, L. T., & Whiting, M. J. (2002). Life on a limb: Ecology of the tree agama (Acanthocercus a. atricollis) in southern Africa. Journal of Zoology, London, 257, 439–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robakiewicz, P., & Daigle, W. (2004). Path quality and foraging time in the crab spider Misumenops asperatus Hentz (Aranea: Thomisidae). Northeastern Naturalist, 11, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., & Kohn, F. (1993). Habitat use, foraging behavior, and activity patterns in reproducing western tarsiers, Tarsius bancanus, in captivity—A management synthesis. Zoo Biology, 12, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rylands, A. B., & De Faria, S. (1993). Habitats, feeding ecology, and home range size in the genus Callithrix. In A. B. Rylands, (ed.), Marmosets and Tamarins: Systematics, Behaviour, and Ecology (pp. 262–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiel, N. (2000). Das estratégias de captura do Callithrix jacchus (Primates, Callitrichidae) à capacidade de fuga da presa. Master’s thesis, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

  • Secor, S. M. (2005). Physiological responses to feeding, fasting and estivation for anurans. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 208, 2595–2608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shine, R., & Li-Xing, S. (2002). Arboreal ambush site selection by pit-vipers Gloydius shedaoensis. Animal Behavior, 63, 565–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1975). Estatística não-paramétrica para ciências do comportamento. São Paulo: Editora Mc-Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. N. M. (1974). The food searching behaviour of two European thrushes. II: The adaptativeness of the search patterns. Behaviour, 59, 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonerud, G. A. (1992). Search tactics of pause and travel predators: Adaptative adjustments of perching times and move distances by hawk owls (Surnia ulula). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30, 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. F., & Rylands, A. B. (1988). The marmosets, genus Callithrix. In A. R. Mittermeier, B. A. Rylands, A. Coimbra-Filho, & B. A. G. Fonseca, (eds.), Ecology and Behaviour of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 2 (pp. 131–222). Washington, D.C.: World Wildlife Fund

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, R. W., & Kinzey, W. G. (1984). The ecological role of the Callitrichidae: A review. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 64, 419–449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tye, A. (1989). A model of search behaviour for the northern wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe (Aves, Turbidae) and other pause-travel predators. Ethology, 83, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank 2 anonymous referees for their very useful suggestions and Dr. Lewis Halsey for his advice on grammar. A Ph.D. grant (BX 171399-0) from the Brazilian Higher Education Authority—CAPES funded the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Federal University of Pernambuco, 50.670-420, Recife, Brazil

    Antonio Souto & Bruna M. Bezerra

  2. Department of Developmental and Theoretical Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Nicola Schiel & Ludwig Huber

Authors
  1. Antonio Souto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruna M. Bezerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicola Schiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ludwig Huber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Souto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Souto, A., Bezerra, B.M., Schiel, N. et al. Saltatory Search in Free-Living Callithrix jacchus: Environmental and Age Influences. Int J Primatol 28, 881–893 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-007-9165-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-007-9165-1

Keywords

search

Navigation