International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 1039–1051 | Cite as

Terrestrial Behavior of Ateles spp

  • Christina J. Campbell
  • Filippo Aureli
  • Colin A. Chapman
  • Gabriel Ramos-Fernández
  • Kim Matthews
  • Sabrina E. Russo
  • Scott Suarez
  • Laura Vick


Spider monkeys (Ateles spp.) are well known for their highly arboreal lifestyle, spending much of their time in the highest levels of the canopy and rarely venturing to the ground. To investigate terrestriality by Ateles and to illuminate the conditions under which spider monkeys venture to the ground, we analyzed ad libitum data from 5 study sites, covering 2 species and 5 subspecies. Three of the sites are in Central/North America: Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama (Ateles geoffroyi panamensis), Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica (A. g. frontatus), and Punta Laguna, Mexico (A. g. yucatanensis). The 2 remaining sites are in South America: Cocha Cashu Biological Station, Perú (A. belzebuth chamek) and Yasuni National Park, Ecuador (A. b. belzebuth). Terrestrialism by Ateles at all sites is rare; however, it is more restricted at the 2 South American sites. In South America, ground use only occurred in the contexts of eating soil or rotten wood and visiting salt licks. In contrast at the 3 sites with Ateles geoffroyi it rarely occurred in a feeding context, but instead more frequently while drinking from streams during the dry season, by adult females escaping attack by adult males, and as part of a chase game. In addition, on BCI adult males were on the ground before attacking adult females. We discuss potential explanations, e.g., climate, species differences, predation pressure, for the differences between the Central/North and South American observations.


Terrestrial behavior predation spider monkeys Ateles 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boinski, S. (1989). The positional behavior and substrate use of squirrel monkeys: Ecological implications. J. Hum. Evol. 18(7): 659–677.Google Scholar
  3. Chapman, C. A. (1988). Patterns of foraging and range use by three species of Neotropical primates. Primates 29: 177–194.Google Scholar
  4. Coelho, A. M., Jr., Bramblett, C. A., and Quick, L. B. (1976). Resource availability and population density in primates: A socio-bioenergetic analysis of the energy budgets of Guatemalan howler and spider monkeys. Primates 17: 63–80.Google Scholar
  5. Dew, J. L. (2005). Foraging, food choice, and food processing by sympatric ripe-fruit specialists, Humboldt's woolly monkey and the white-bellied spider monkey. Int. J. Primatol. 26: 1107–1135.Google Scholar
  6. De Souza, L., Ferrari, S. F., Da Costa, M. L., and Kern, D. C. (2002). Geophagy as a correlate of folivory in red-handed howler monkeys (Alouatta belzebul) from Eastern Brazilian Amazonia. J. Chem. Ecol. 28(8): 1613–1621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Fiore, A. (2002). Predator sensitive foraging in the ateline primates. In Miller, L. (ed.), Eat or be Eaten: Predator Sensitive Foraging Among Primates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 242–267.Google Scholar
  8. Di Fiore, A., and Rodman, P. S. (2001). Time allocation patterns of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in a neotropical terra firma forest. Int. J. Primatol. 22: 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emmons, L. H., and Feer, F. (1990). Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Fleagle, J. G. (1999). Primate Adaptation and Evolution. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Freese, C. H., and Oppenheimer, J. R. (1981). The capuchin monkeys, genus Cebus. In Coimbra-Filho, A. F., and Mittermeier R. A. (eds.), Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates. Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 331–390.Google Scholar
  12. Glanz, W. E. (1982). The terrestrial mammal fauna of Barro Colorado Island: Censuses and long-term changes. In Leigh, E. G., Rand, A. S., and Windsor, D. M. (eds.), Ecology of a Tropical Forest. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 455–468.Google Scholar
  13. Heymann, E. W., and Hartmann, G. (1991). Geophagy in moustached tamarins, Saguinus mystax (Platyrrhini: Callitrichidae), at the Río Blanco, Peruvian Amazonia. Primates 2(4): 533–537.Google Scholar
  14. Izawa, K. (1993). Soil-eating by Alouatta and Ateles. Int. J. Primatol. 14(2): 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karesh, W. B., Wallace, R. B., Painter, R. L. E., Rumiz, D., Braselton, W. E., Dierenfeld, E. S., and Puche, H. (1998). Immobilization and health assessment of free-ranging black spider monkeys (Ateles pansicus chamek). Am. J. Primatol. 44: 107–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein, L. L., and Klein, D. B. (1977). Feeding behaviour of the Colombian spider monkey. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.), Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  17. Klein, L. L. (1972). The Ecology and Social Behavior of the me Spider Monkey, Ateles belzebyth. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Leigh, E. G. Jr. (1999). Tropical Forest Ecology: A View From Barro Colorado Island. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, L. (2002). The role of group size in predator sensitive foraging decisions for wedge-capped capuchin monkeys (Cebus olivaceus). In Miller, L. (ed.), Eat or be Eaten: Predator Sensitive Foraging Among Primates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar
  20. Müller, K. H., Ahl, C., and Hartmann, G. (1997). Geophagy in masked titi monkeys (Callicebus personatus melanochir) in Brazil. Primates 38(1): 69–77.Google Scholar
  21. Napier, J. R., and Napier, P. H. (1985). The Natural History of the Primates. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  22. Russo, S. E., Campbell, C. J., Stevenson, P. R., and Suarez, S. A. (2005). Multiforest Comparison of Dietary Preferences and Seed Dispersal by Ateles spp. Int. J. Primato. 26: 1017–1037.Google Scholar
  23. Setz, E. Z. F., Enzweiler, J., Solferini, V. N., Amêndola, M. P., and Berton, R. S. (1999). Geophagy in the golden-faced saki monkey (Pithecia pithecia chrysocephala) in the Central Amazon. J. Zool. Lond. 247: 91–103Google Scholar
  24. Symington, M. M. (1987). Ecological and Social Correlates of Party Size in the Black Spider Monkey, Ateles paniscus chamek. Ph.D. Thesis. Princeton University, Princeton.Google Scholar
  25. Terborgh, J. (1983). Five New World Primates. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  26. Van Roosemalen, M. G. M. (1985). Habitat preferences, diet, feeding strategy and social organization of the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus paniscus Linnaeus 1758) in Suriname. Acta Amizonica. 15, suppl. 3/4: 3–238.Google Scholar
  27. Wright, S. J., Gompper, M. E., and DeLeon, B. (1994). Are large predators keystone species in Neotropical forests? The evidence from Barro Colorado Island. OIKOS, 71: 279–294.Google Scholar
  28. Youlatus, D. (2002). Positional behavior of black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus) in French Guiana. Int. J. Primatol. 23(5): 1071–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina J. Campbell
    • 1
  • Filippo Aureli
    • 2
  • Colin A. Chapman
    • 3
  • Gabriel Ramos-Fernández
    • 4
  • Kim Matthews
    • 2
  • Sabrina E. Russo
    • 5
  • Scott Suarez
    • 6
  • Laura Vick
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyPomona CollegeClaremontUSA
  2. 2.School of Biological and Earth SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Pronatura Peninsula de YucatanMeridaMexico
  5. 5.Department of Animal BiologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  6. 6.Department of AnthropologyState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA
  7. 7.AnthropologyPeace CollegeRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations